本文選題：郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)　切入點(diǎn)：科爾沁方言　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2012年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文用praat語(yǔ)音分析軟件提取郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)元音和輔音的相關(guān)參數(shù),建立聲學(xué)參數(shù)庫(kù),用聲學(xué)語(yǔ)音學(xué)的方法確立其舌位,分析研究詞首、非詞首短元音的(?)化,前化等語(yǔ)音現(xiàn)象,歸納其元音和諧律。確定復(fù)合元音的性質(zhì)。分析雙音節(jié)詞,三音節(jié)詞的音長(zhǎng)、音強(qiáng)、音高的基礎(chǔ)上確定其詞重音的位置和性質(zhì)。依照輔音聲學(xué)圖及參數(shù)說(shuō)明探討了輔音的種類、長(zhǎng)度、強(qiáng)度等并進(jìn)行了對(duì)比研究。用聲學(xué)語(yǔ)音學(xué)的方法研究科爾沁方言的重要組成部分郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ),不僅能夠豐富科爾沁方言的研究?jī)?nèi)容,而且填補(bǔ)了郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)聲學(xué)研究的空白,為建立蒙古語(yǔ)各方言土語(yǔ)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)統(tǒng)一平臺(tái)提供基礎(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)和科學(xué)依據(jù)。 本文由引言、短元音、長(zhǎng)元音、復(fù)合元音、元音和諧律及詞重音、輔音、結(jié)論等7章內(nèi)容和參考文獻(xiàn)、附錄等組成。在引言中闡述了選題目的、研究意義、研究方法以及研究歷史；在第一章中,用聲學(xué)語(yǔ)音學(xué)的方法確定了郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)詞首、非詞首短元音的舌位,并與科爾沁土語(yǔ)短元音進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析；第二章中,比較分析了郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)詞首、非詞首長(zhǎng)元音。研究結(jié)果顯示,郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)中詞首短元音和長(zhǎng)元音不僅在長(zhǎng)度上存在差異,而且在舌位上長(zhǎng)元音的舌位范圍明顯大于短元音。非詞首長(zhǎng)元音比詞首長(zhǎng)元音舌位范圍縮短,差異性特征相對(duì)減弱；第三章中,比較研究了郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)復(fù)合元音。研究結(jié)果表明,郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)的復(fù)合元音是上升二合元音；第四章中,分析了元音和諧律和詞重音。發(fā)現(xiàn)郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)中元音的陰陽(yáng)和諧相對(duì)弱化,非詞首音節(jié)[9][i][i：][u：]等元音不僅與陰性元音和諧,也與陽(yáng)性元音和諧。郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)的詞重音并非固定在第一音節(jié)上,不論是音高重音還是音強(qiáng)重音都出現(xiàn)在詞尾音節(jié)上；第五章中,重點(diǎn)對(duì)基本輔音的發(fā)音方法和發(fā)音位置進(jìn)行了分析研究,并從音長(zhǎng)和音強(qiáng)方面闡述了輔音的特征。結(jié)論部分歸納總結(jié)了實(shí)驗(yàn)研究結(jié)果。 研究結(jié)果表明,郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)雖屬于科爾沁方言,但是地理位置與科爾沁方言中心區(qū)域相隔較遠(yuǎn),語(yǔ)言相互影響減弱,漫漫歷史長(zhǎng)河中形成了自己獨(dú)特的語(yǔ)言規(guī)律。不僅元音舌位不同,其音長(zhǎng)、音強(qiáng)、音高等語(yǔ)音特點(diǎn)也有所不同。非詞首短元弱化程度比科爾沁土語(yǔ)更明顯。郭爾羅斯、杜爾伯特次土語(yǔ)不僅區(qū)別于科爾沁土語(yǔ),它們相互間也存在一定差別�？偟膩�(lái)說(shuō),郭爾羅斯的元音比杜爾伯特相應(yīng)的元音低、后。
[Abstract]:This paper uses the praat phonetic analysis software to extract the relevant parameters of the vowels and consonants in Guerros, Durbert subdialect, establishes the acoustic parameter database, establishes its tongue position by acoustic phonetics, and analyzes and studies the vowels of the first and the non-initial vowels. ), such as phonetic phenomena, such as phonetic phenomena, such as phonetic phenomena, such as summing up their vowels' harmonious laws, determining the properties of compound vowels, analyzing the two syllable words, the sound length and the sound intensity of the three syllable words, According to the acoustics of consonants and the description of parameters, the types and lengths of consonants are discussed. Using the method of acoustic phonetics to study the important parts of Horqin dialect, Guolos and Durbert subdialect, can not only enrich the research content of Horqin dialect, but also fill up the research content of Horqin dialect. The blank of Duerbert subdialect acoustics provides the basic data and scientific basis for the establishment of the unified platform of Mongolian dialect database. This paper is composed of seven chapters: introduction, short vowel, long vowel, compound vowel, vowel harmony rule, word stress, consonant, conclusion and so on. In the first chapter, the author uses the acoustic phonetics method to determine the tongue position of the short vowels of Gerros, Durbert subnative words and non-preface vowels, and compares them with the short vowels of Horqin dialect. In the second chapter, The results show that the short vowels and long vowels are not only different in length, but also in short vowels and long vowels in Durbert subdialect. Moreover, the range of long vowels on the tongue is obviously larger than that of short vowels. The range of non-verbal vowels is shorter than that of word-headed vowels, and the characteristics of differences are relatively weakened. The results show that the compound vowels of Guolos and Durbert subvernacular are ascending dijoint vowels. Chapter 4th analyzes the harmony law and word stress of vowels. The yin and yang harmony of vowels in Dubert subdialect is relatively weak, and the vowels such as non-initials [9] [I] [i:] [u:] are not only in harmony with negative vowels, but also with masculine vowels. Both pitch stress and strong stress appear in the ending syllable. Chapter 5th focuses on the analysis of the basic consonant pronunciation method and position. The characteristics of consonants in terms of pitch length and intensity are discussed. The results show that although Guerros and Durbert subdialect belong to Horqin dialect, their geographical position is far away from the central area of Horqin dialect, and the influence of language on each other is weakened. The long history has formed its own unique language law. Not only different vowels, but also different phonological characteristics, such as sound length, sound intensity, pitch, etc. The weakening degree of non-word initial short elements is more obvious than that of Horqin dialect. Durbert subvernacular is not only different from Horqin dialect, but also different from each other. In general, the vowel of Guerroth is lower than Duerbert's corresponding vowel.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H231

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹道巴特爾;蒙古語(yǔ)方言土語(yǔ)劃分和喀喇沁──土默特土語(yǔ)研究[J];滿語(yǔ)研究;1999年02期

2 烏日格喜樂(lè)圖;哈斯其木格;呼和;;鄂溫克語(yǔ)短元音聲學(xué)分析[J];滿語(yǔ)研究;2010年02期

3 道布;;蒙古語(yǔ)的元音和諧與元音音位對(duì)立的中和[J];民族語(yǔ)文;1984年02期

4 張亞光;波·少布;;蒙古語(yǔ)杜爾伯特話的特點(diǎn)[J];民族語(yǔ)文;1990年02期

5 鮑懷翹;呂士楠;;蒙古語(yǔ)察哈爾話元音松緊的聲學(xué)分析[J];民族語(yǔ)文;1992年01期

6 呼和;蒙古語(yǔ)元音的聲學(xué)分析[J];民族語(yǔ)文;1999年04期

7 呼和;蒙古語(yǔ)輔音腭化問(wèn)題研究[J];民族語(yǔ)文;2005年02期

8 哈斯其木格;;基于EPG的蒙古語(yǔ)/r/輔音研究[J];南京師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

9 圖雅;關(guān)于聲學(xué)語(yǔ)音學(xué)研究方法的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年06期

10 呼和;蒙古語(yǔ)／r／輔音的聲學(xué)分析[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 包桂蘭;基于EPG的蒙古語(yǔ)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)音協(xié)同發(fā)音研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李玲玲;蒙古語(yǔ)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)音塞音和塞擦音的聲學(xué)格局研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年

2 胡紅彥;蒙古語(yǔ)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)音清擦音實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2011年

3 陳秀梅;蒙古語(yǔ)察哈爾土語(yǔ)輔音組合“4×6”的聲學(xué)和生理分析[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1590104