本文選題：評(píng)價(jià)理論　切入點(diǎn)：對(duì)比分析　出處：《安徽大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自Martin的Beyond Exchange:Appraisal Systems in English發(fā)表以來,評(píng)價(jià)理論在國內(nèi)外受到眾多關(guān)注,也得到了不斷的發(fā)展和完善。該理論是系統(tǒng)功能語言學(xué)對(duì)人際意義研究的一個(gè)新發(fā)展方向,包括三大主系統(tǒng)：態(tài)度、介入和級(jí)差。該理論關(guān)注的是運(yùn)用語言表達(dá)態(tài)度的資源。 隨著世界經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化的發(fā)展,各國之間的聯(lián)系越來越緊密,災(zāi)難對(duì)人類生活的影響也越來越大,因此人們對(duì)災(zāi)難性新聞報(bào)道的關(guān)注度也越來越高。災(zāi)難性新聞報(bào)道的傳播不僅可以使讀者了解災(zāi)難本身,同時(shí)也能夠引導(dǎo)大眾對(duì)災(zāi)難的認(rèn)識(shí),鼓勵(lì)或挫敗人們對(duì)待災(zāi)難的心態(tài)。因此,災(zāi)難性新聞報(bào)道是值得研究者關(guān)注和研究的。本文分別選取China Daily和UAS Today報(bào)紙中的各15篇災(zāi)難性新聞報(bào)道在評(píng)價(jià)理論框架下分析災(zāi)難性新聞?wù)Z言特點(diǎn),并利用語言學(xué)軟件UAM CorpusTool對(duì)比中美報(bào)紙?jiān)谠u(píng)價(jià)資源運(yùn)用的異同,探討表達(dá)人際意義的方法。 本文在評(píng)價(jià)理論的框架下對(duì)中國和美國的災(zāi)難性新聞進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,得出以下結(jié)論：首先,在整個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)中,中國和美國的災(zāi)難性新聞報(bào)道都使用最多的是態(tài)度資源,其次是級(jí)差資源,最少的是介入資源。在這兩組新聞中,三項(xiàng)評(píng)價(jià)性資源在運(yùn)用比例中沒有顯著差異。在態(tài)度系統(tǒng)之內(nèi),情感性資源較多地出現(xiàn)在中國新聞報(bào)道,而鑒賞性資源被跟多地運(yùn)用在美國新聞中。其次,在介入資源的整體使用上,兩組語篇差異不大。但中國新聞在報(bào)道災(zāi)難事件時(shí)對(duì)介入系統(tǒng)下的擴(kuò)展資源的使用要高于美國新聞,而且在擴(kuò)展資源下,歸屬類資源也更多地出現(xiàn)在中國的新聞報(bào)道中。最后,在級(jí)差系統(tǒng)之內(nèi),判斷性資源在中美災(zāi)難性新聞報(bào)道中大都屬于語勢(shì)而非聚焦。 通過對(duì)比分析中美災(zāi)難性新聞報(bào)道中評(píng)價(jià)資源的使用,文章在評(píng)價(jià)理論呢框架下研究新聞報(bào)道,希望能為以后有關(guān)評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)的應(yīng)用和新聞?wù)Z言的探索研究提供一些參考。由于該理論本身存在復(fù)雜性和一些主觀因素,加之本文作者個(gè)人能力的局限,這方面的研究還需要不斷發(fā)展和完善。
[Abstract]:Since the publication of Martin's Beyond Exchange:Appraisal Systems in English, the theory of evaluation has attracted much attention both at home and abroad, and has also been continuously developed and perfected. It is a new direction in the study of interpersonal meaning in systemic functional linguistics. It consists of three main systems: attitude, intervention and differential. This theory focuses on the resources of using language to express attitude. With the development of the globalization of the world economy, the relationship between countries is getting closer and closer, and the impact of disasters on human life is becoming more and more serious. As a result, people pay more and more attention to catastrophic news reports. The spread of catastrophic news reports not only enables readers to understand the disaster itself, but also leads the public to understand the disaster. Encourage or thwart people's attitude toward disaster. Catastrophic news reports are worthy of researchers' attention and research. In this paper, 15 China Daily and 15 UAS Today news reports are selected to analyze the linguistic characteristics of catastrophic news under the framework of evaluation theory. Using the linguistic software UAM CorpusTool to compare the similarities and differences between Chinese and American newspapers in evaluating the use of resources, this paper probes into the methods of expressing interpersonal meaning. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the disastrous news in China and the United States under the framework of evaluation theory, and draws the following conclusions: first of all, in the whole evaluation system, attitude resources are the most frequently used in the disastrous news reports in China and the United States. In the two groups of news, there is no significant difference in the proportion of the use of the three evaluative resources. Within the attitude system, affective resources appear more frequently in Chinese news reports. And appreciation resources are used more and more in American news. Secondly, in terms of the overall use of interventional resources, There is no significant difference between the two groups of discourses. However, the use of the expanded resources under the intervention system in China news reports is higher than that in the US news system, and under the extended resources, the category resources also appear more frequently in the news reports in China. Within the differential system, the critical resources in the catastrophic news reports in China and the United States mostly belong to the language rather than focus. By comparing and analyzing the use of evaluation resources in catastrophic news reports between China and the United States, the article studies news reports under the framework of evaluation theory. The author hopes to provide some reference for the application of evaluation system and the research of news language in the future. Due to the complexity and subjective factors of the theory itself and the limitations of the author's personal ability, The research in this area still needs to be developed and perfected continuously.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：H05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張歡雨;;基于評(píng)價(jià)理論的朝核問題英語新聞報(bào)道的態(tài)度分析[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期

2 滕，

本文編號(hào)：1575239