本文關(guān)鍵詞： 批評性語篇分析 新聞?wù)Z篇 人民幣升值 意識形態(tài)意義　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：批評性語篇分析起始于20世紀(jì)70年代末期的語言分析的新分支——批評語言學(xué)。批評性語篇分析研究者認(rèn)為語篇是帶有意識形態(tài)意義的語言選擇的結(jié)果,所以他們致力于揭示隱含的意識形態(tài)以及語言和意識形態(tài)之間的關(guān)系。當(dāng)今,越來越多的批評性語篇分析研究者對媒體語篇的批評性分析表現(xiàn)出了濃厚的興趣,對于新聞?wù)Z篇的關(guān)注已經(jīng)成為一個重要的例證。本文通過對中美兩份報(bào)紙中的新聞?wù)Z篇進(jìn)行的細(xì)致分析,揭示了新聞?wù)Z篇中隱含的意識形態(tài)及其對人們的觀點(diǎn)和認(rèn)知的影響,以期為中國新聞媒體如何增強(qiáng)其影響力提供一定的啟示。 基于費(fèi)爾克勞的三維模型、韓禮德的系統(tǒng)功能語言學(xué)及李普曼的大眾傳播理論,本文選取了《中國日報(bào)》和《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》中各十篇有關(guān)人民幣升值的報(bào)道進(jìn)行了批評性語篇分析,并對兩者進(jìn)行了對比研究,以期確認(rèn)這兩份報(bào)紙中的新聞?wù)Z篇在語篇表現(xiàn)上的主要區(qū)別并揭示其隱含的意識形態(tài)。本研究分三個步驟進(jìn)行：描寫、闡釋和解釋。在描寫階段,作者從所選擇的新聞?wù)Z篇的詞匯選擇、及物性分析以及情態(tài)三方面進(jìn)行研究；在闡釋階段,作者從新聞來源和報(bào)道方式以及擬態(tài)環(huán)境和刻板成見對于人們認(rèn)知的影響的角度對所選取的新聞報(bào)道進(jìn)行研究；在解釋階段,作者從特定的制度、形勢和社會文化環(huán)境三方面來解釋影響新聞?wù)Z篇意識形態(tài)的環(huán)境因素。 本文的研究結(jié)果與以往的語篇分析研究結(jié)果總體一致,但本研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在詞匯選擇、情態(tài)以及新聞來源三方面存在較明顯差異：第一,兩份報(bào)紙傾向于使用不同的詞匯來描述中國的人民幣匯率以及兩國對于人民幣升值的態(tài)度；第二,從情態(tài)的角度來看,《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》中的新聞?wù)Z篇相對來說更加靈活地運(yùn)用了高值和低值情態(tài)動詞,使其新聞報(bào)道的語氣既強(qiáng)勢又不失溫和,而《中國日報(bào)》中的新聞?wù)Z篇傾向于更多地使用中值情態(tài)動詞；第三,兩份報(bào)紙傾向于選擇最能支撐它們各自觀點(diǎn)和立場的新聞來源。這些差異說明經(jīng)濟(jì)新聞?wù)Z篇并非絕對公正、客觀,它們多多少少都帶有特定的意識形態(tài)意義。 本研究的重要性主要體現(xiàn)在以下四個方面：首先,本研究進(jìn)一步拓展了批評性語篇分析的研究范圍。傳統(tǒng)上的批評性語篇分析著重于研究政治問題,而很少涉及經(jīng)濟(jì)新聞中的意識形態(tài)的研究,而且迄今為止,還沒有系統(tǒng)地對人民幣升值這一經(jīng)濟(jì)事件進(jìn)行意識形態(tài)研究的文章；其次,本研究證明了運(yùn)用比較的方法來研究不同新聞媒體對同一新聞事件的報(bào)道既適用又有效。本文通過對比中美兩國各自的代表性報(bào)紙《中國日報(bào)》和《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》對于人民幣升值事件的相關(guān)報(bào)道,揭示了不同新聞?wù)Z篇中表現(xiàn)出來的新聞報(bào)道者不同的意識形態(tài)；第三,本研究顯示,為了避免外國新聞報(bào)道中隱含的意識形態(tài)的影響或誤導(dǎo),讀者在新聞閱讀過程中必須提高自身的批評意識；另外,本文的研究結(jié)果也給中國新聞媒體提供一定的啟示：中國新聞媒體要更加注重廣泛深入地在國際場合宣傳自己的政策及其政策的合理性,以向國際社會響亮地發(fā)出自己強(qiáng)有力的聲音。
[Abstract]:A new branch of critical discourse analysis began in the late 1970s language: critical linguistics. CDA researchers believe that discourse is with ideological meaning in the language of choice, so they are committed to the relationship between language and reveal the hidden ideology and ideology. Nowadays, more and more critical discourse analysis the analysis of critical media discourse showed a keen interest in news discourse and becomes an important example. This paper makes a detailed analysis of the news discourse between China and the United States in two newspapers, effect reveals the hidden ideology in news discourse and on people's attitudes and cognition, in order to provide some enlightenment for the China news media to enhance their influence.
The 3D model based on Phil Klau's theory of mass communication, systemic functional linguistics and Lippmann Hallidy, this paper selects the < > and < > Chinese daily in the New York Times ten articles on RMB appreciation reports were critical discourse analysis, and both of them are compared, in order to confirm the news discourse from the two newspapers the main difference in the performance of the discourse and reveal the hidden ideology. This study is divided into three steps: description, interpretation and explanation. At the stage of description, the author from the news discourse of the selected word choice of transitivity and modality analysis of three aspects; in the stage of interpretation, the author makes a research on the the selected news reports from news sources and reports, as well as Pseudo Environment and stereotypes influence on people's cognitive perspective; in the stage of explanation, the author from the specific situation of system. The three aspects of the social and cultural environment explain the environmental factors that affect the ideology of the news discourse.
The research results generally consistent and discourse analysis in the past, but the study found that, in the choice of vocabulary, there are obvious differences between modality and news from three aspects: first, second newspapers tend to use different words to describe the RMB exchange rate to Chinese and two for the appreciation of the RMB second, from the modal attitude; point of view, the New York Times < > in the news discourse is relatively more flexible use of high value and low value modal verbs, which makes the tone of its news both tough and soft, and "news discourse China journal in tendency to use more median modal verbs; third, second newspapers tend to choose most can support their views and positions of news sources. These differences suggest that economic news discourse is not absolutely fair, objective, they were more or less with the specific ideology Significance.
The importance of this study is mainly reflected in the following four aspects: first, this study further expands the research scope of CDA. Critical discourse analysis traditionally focuses on political issues, research and rarely involve in economic news ideology, and so far, there is no systematic on the renminbi appreciation a study of the ideology of economic events; secondly, this research shows that to study the different media on the same news reports both applicable and effective use of the comparative method. Through the comparison of the United States in their respective representative newspaper < > and < > Chinese daily New York Times for related reports of RMB appreciation event, revealing the performance of different news discourse in the news reports of different ideologies; third, this study shows that, in order to avoid hidden foreign news reports The influence of ideology or misleading, the reader must improve their critical awareness in news reading process; in addition, offer some inspiration to the research results of this paper are to Chinese news media: Chinese news media should pay more attention to the rationality of extensive and in-depth awareness of their own policies and policies in the international arena, to show the international community out loud his strong voice.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H052

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李艷;;“擬態(tài)環(huán)境”與“刻板成見”——《公眾輿論》的閱讀札記[J];東南傳播;2010年05期

2 張延續(xù);批評語言學(xué)與大眾語篇——對美國新聞周刊的批評性分析[J];解放軍外語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年06期

3 苗興偉;;語篇分析的進(jìn)展與前沿[J];外語學(xué)刊;2006年01期

4 王慶新,紀(jì)衛(wèi)寧;批評式語篇分析及其應(yīng)用[J];山東外語教學(xué);2000年01期

5 徐立新;語言反映意識形態(tài)——對四家報(bào)紙關(guān)于印度核試驗(yàn)報(bào)道的語篇分析[J];外語教學(xué);1999年04期

6 陳中竺;批評語言學(xué)述評[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;1995年01期

7 肖陽;;批評語篇分析及應(yīng)用——以奧巴馬宣布本·拉登被擊斃的演講為例[J];文學(xué)界(理論版);2011年06期

8 戴煒華,高軍;批評語篇分析:理論評述和實(shí)例分析[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2002年06期

9 辛斌;批評性語篇分析:問題與討論[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2004年05期

10 韓小聰;;批評性話語分析在解讀英語新聞中的應(yīng)用[J];新聞愛好者;2011年16期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 彭麗;話語、權(quán)力及意識形態(tài)[D];華中師范大學(xué);2004年

2 王秀然;美國移民改革期間相關(guān)移民問題新聞報(bào)道的批評話語分析[D];河北師范大學(xué);2009年

3 柳笛;《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》中涉華負(fù)面報(bào)道的批評語篇分析[D];暨南大學(xué);2009年

4 馬安秀;關(guān)于加沙沖突新聞報(bào)道的批評語篇分析[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

5 謝穎;中美報(bào)紙對2009年聯(lián)合國氣候會議報(bào)道的批評語篇分析[D];山東大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1501060