發(fā)布時間：2018-02-02 13:16

  本文關鍵詞： 雙項式并列短語 詞序制約因素 可逆性 詞序預測成功率 固化 對比研究　出處：《上海外國語大學》2012年博士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：本文以“漢英雙項式并列短語的詞序制約因素研究”為題，圍繞雙項式并列短語（也稱“并列二項式”）的可逆性和詞序制約因素的詞序預測成功率，以語料庫檢索的方式，定量考察詞序制約因素，并對比分析詞序制約因素在漢英雙項式并列短語中的異同。本研究有三個主要目標：考察詞序制約因素的詞序預測成功率；預測和說明短語固化的過程；描寫和解釋詞序制約因素在漢英中的表現(xiàn)異同。 認知語言學的基本觀點與假設、范疇的原型觀以及標記理論、語言的象似性、概念整合理論以及詞匯化和短語固化構成本研究的理論基礎�；谡Z料庫的定量研究方法為全面考察詞序制約因素在并列二項式詞序中的制約力提供了可能。 制約雙項式并列短語詞序的主要因素包括語義因素、語音因素和詞頻因素。語義因素細分為六條次原則：權力、時間、重要性、顯著性、積極性、遞升原則。 研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，首先，漢語中詞序制約因素預測成功率的排序為：語義＞語音＞詞頻；各語義因素的詞序預測能力由強到弱可排列為：重要性＞時間，遞升，積極性，權力＞顯著性。英語中語義因素與其他因素的詞序預測成功率層級為：遞升＞時間（象似性），，積極性，重要性＞顯著性，權力＞其他因素；各語義因素的詞序預測成功率層級為：遞升＞時間（象似性），積極性，重要性＞顯著性，權力。 其次，預測漢語并列二項式的詞序固化或不可逆的語義因素由最主要到最次要的排序為：積極性，權力＞時間，遞升＞顯著性，重要性；預測英語并列二項式的詞序固化或不可逆的語義因素由最主要到最次要的排序為：權力，遞升＞顯著性，重要性＞時間，積極性。 漢英并列二項式就詞序制約因素的制約力而言有相同也有不同。共同點主要有四方面：語義因素占主導作用；時間和遞升因素有很高的詞序預測成功率；詞頻因素制約詞序的作用不明顯；權力是最能預測固化的主要因素。不同點主要有五方面：漢語并列二項式的固化程度總體上低于英語；語義因素對漢語并列二項式詞序的制約作用強于英語，語音因素對英語并列二項式詞序的制約作用強于漢語；時間順序原則對漢語并列二項式詞序有普遍的制約作用；重要性因素在漢語并列二項式中的詞序預測成功率高于英語；權力因素能更好地預測漢語并列二項式的固化。 語言本體、認知以及民族文化等三方面的特點是造成詞序制約因素在漢英并列二項式中表現(xiàn)異同的主要原因。語境制約并列二項式的詞序，導致詞序突顯。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on "the study of word order restriction factors of Chinese and English double-term parallel phrases", and focuses on the reversibility of two-term juxtaposed phrases (also known as "parallel binomial") and the success rate of word order prediction of word order constraints. In the way of corpus retrieval, the restrictive factors of word order are quantitatively investigated. This study has three main objectives: to investigate the success rate of word order prediction of word order constraint factors; Predict and explain the process of phrase solidification; Describe and explain the similarities and differences of word order constraints in Chinese and English. The basic viewpoints and hypotheses of cognitive linguistics, the archetypal view of category and the theory of marker, the iconicity of language. The theory of conceptual integration and lexicalization and phrase solidification constitute the theoretical basis of this study. The quantitative research method based on corpus provides the possibility to investigate the constraint of word order in the paratactic binomial word order. The main factors restricting the word order of two-item parallel phrases include semantic factors, phonetic factors and word frequency factors. Semantic factors are subdivided into six principles: power, time, importance, significance, enthusiasm. Progressive principle First of all, the order of success rate of word order constraint factors in Chinese is: semantic > phonetic > word frequency; The order prediction ability of each semantic factor from strong to weak can be arranged as: importance > time, rising, enthusiasm. The success rate of word order prediction of semantic factors and other factors in English is as follows: progressive > time (iconicity, enthusiasm, importance > significance, power > other factors); The success rate of word order prediction of each semantic factor is as follows: ascending > time (iconicity, enthusiasm, importance > significance, power). Secondly, it is predicted that the semantic factors of Chinese juxtaposition binomial word order solidification or irreversibility are: enthusiasm, power > time, ascending > significance, importance; The order of semantic factors from the most important to the most secondary is: power, escalation > significance, importance > time, enthusiasm, and so on, in order to predict the word order solidification or irreversibility of English juxtaposition binomial. The binomial coordinate binomial of Chinese and English has the same or different restrictive power in terms of word order restriction factors. There are four aspects in common: semantic factors play a leading role; Time and ascending factors have a high success rate of word order prediction. The effect of word frequency factor on word order is not obvious. Power is the main factor that can predict the solidification. There are five main differences: the curing degree of Chinese binomial is generally lower than that of English; Semantic factors have a stronger effect on Chinese paratactic binomial word order than English, and phonological factors have stronger influence on English paratactic binomial word order than Chinese. The principle of time order has a universal restriction on the word order of Chinese juxtaposition binomial; The success rate of word order prediction in Chinese binomial is higher than that in English. Power factors can better predict the solidification of Chinese binomial juxtaposition. The features of language ontology, cognition and national culture are the main reasons for the similarities and differences of word order constraints in Chinese and English juxtaposition binomial. Context constrains the word order of parallel binomial, which leads to the prominent word order.
【學位授予單位】：上海外國語大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：H314;H146

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 周祖謨;漢語駢列的詞語和四聲[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1985年03期

2 徐盛桓;;心智哲學與認知語言學創(chuàng)新[J];北京科技大學學報(社會科學版);2010年01期

3 廖秋忠;;《語言的共性與類型》述評[J];國外語言學;1984年04期

4 戴浩一;黃河;;時間順序和漢語的語序[J];國外語言學;1988年01期

5 謝信一;葉蜚聲;;漢語中的時間和意象(中)[J];國外語言學;1992年01期

6 胡壯麟;美國功能語言學家Givón的研究現(xiàn)狀[J];國外語言學;1996年04期

7 嚴辰松;語言臨摹性概說[J];國外語言學;1997年03期

8 詹衛(wèi)東;80年代以來漢語信息處理研究述評──作為現(xiàn)代漢語語法研究的應用背景之一[J];當代語言學;2000年02期

9 彭在義;英漢并列詞組的詞序與翻譯[J];大學英語;1988年03期

10 葉建軍;“標記”概念芻議[J];福建外語;1999年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 高琴;現(xiàn)代漢語并列結構的語序考察[D];山西大學;2004年

2 周欣;現(xiàn)代漢語并列N項式研究[D];河北大學;2006年

3 王會芬;漢英并列結構語序的比較研究[D];安徽大學;2007年

4 于建偉;英語新詞名—名復合詞研究[D];河南大學;2008年

5 吳茜;試論現(xiàn)代漢語并列結構語序[D];天津師范大學;2009年

本文編號：1484596