本文選題：紀(jì)實(shí)性　切入點(diǎn)：虛構(gòu)性　出處：《電影文學(xué)》2017年15期

【摘要】：辨析紀(jì)錄片與偽紀(jì)錄片,明確兩者邊界問(wèn)題,需要掌握兩者不同的體裁規(guī)定性,進(jìn)而確定基礎(chǔ)語(yǔ)義域,分析紀(jì)錄片與偽紀(jì)錄片是如何明晰界限的,又是如何與可能世界發(fā)生聯(lián)系的;本文旨在結(jié)合可能世界理論,從紀(jì)錄片和偽紀(jì)錄片的區(qū)分界限、體裁規(guī)定性和期待視野出發(fā),對(duì)紀(jì)錄片和偽紀(jì)錄片做一個(gè)明確辨析,確定紀(jì)錄片和偽紀(jì)錄片的不同性質(zhì)、特征,為紀(jì)錄片或偽紀(jì)錄片的專(zhuān)題研究奠定基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:To distinguish and analyze documentary and pseudo-documentary, to clarify the boundary between them, we need to master their different genres, then determine the basic semantic domain, and analyze how documentary and pseudo-documentary clearly define the boundary. The purpose of this paper is to make a clear analysis of documentary and pseudo-documentaries from the distinction between documentary and pseudo-documentary, from the perspective of genre regulation and expectation, based on the theory of the possible world, how to connect with the possible world, and how to make a clear distinction between the documentary and the pseudo-documentary. To determine the different nature and characteristics of documentary and pseudo-documentary, to lay a foundation for the special research of documentary or pseudo-documentary.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)文學(xué)與新聞學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：J952
，

本文編號(hào)：1690104