本文選題：媒體環(huán)境　切入點(diǎn)：發(fā)展問(wèn)題　出處：《現(xiàn)代傳播(中國(guó)傳媒大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào))》2017年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：正近年來(lái),論及國(guó)內(nèi)紀(jì)錄片產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展問(wèn)題的時(shí)候,兩個(gè)關(guān)鍵性的詞語(yǔ)出現(xiàn)的頻次一直居高不下——一個(gè)是"政策",還有一個(gè)是"融媒體"。這兩個(gè)詞所指代的都是紀(jì)錄片產(chǎn)業(yè)化發(fā)展環(huán)境方面的因素,卻也基本成了這一時(shí)期推動(dòng)國(guó)內(nèi)紀(jì)錄片發(fā)展的兩個(gè)根本性力量。雖然,這一時(shí)期也有一些其它詞語(yǔ),如"跨界""平臺(tái)""資本""渠道""內(nèi)容"等等出現(xiàn)在各類紀(jì)錄片論壇上、文章中,但相較于"政策"和"融媒體"而言,它們所產(chǎn)生的意義和影響都
[Abstract]:In recent years, when talking about the development of domestic documentary industry, The frequency of the emergence of two key words has been consistently high-one is "policy" and the other is "media integration". Both refer to factors in the development environment of documentary industrialization. However, it has basically become two fundamental forces in promoting the development of domestic documentaries during this period. Although there are some other words in this period, such as "cross-border", "platform," "capital," "channels," "content," and so on, they appear in various documentary forums. In the article, however, compared to "policy" and "financial media," they have both implications and implications.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)傳媒大學(xué)新聞傳播學(xué)部;中國(guó)傳媒大學(xué)中國(guó)紀(jì)錄片研究中心;
【分類號(hào)】：J952

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 蒯哲;;自媒體環(huán)境下的微電影的創(chuàng)作[J];中國(guó)傳媒科技;2013年22期

2 殷俊;江虹;;商業(yè)微電影——品牌靈魂的傳遞[J];中國(guó)電影市場(chǎng);2014年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1617206