本文關(guān)鍵詞：語用學(xué)，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

語用學(xué)
《語用學(xué)》一書作者對(duì)語用學(xué)與句法學(xué)以及語義學(xué)的界面進(jìn)行研究，為我們展現(xiàn)出了一幅比較完整的語用學(xué)研究圖景。全書『見解獨(dú)到、內(nèi)容新穎，是一部優(yōu)秀的語用學(xué)教科書�！墩Z用學(xué)》作者黃衍早年留學(xué)英國，，師從著名語用學(xué)家Stephell C.Levinson，獲劍橋大學(xué)博士學(xué)位，后冉獲牛津大學(xué)博士學(xué)位，并曾在這兩所人學(xué)及雷丁大學(xué)執(zhí)教。黃衍現(xiàn)為新西蘭奧克蘭久學(xué)語言學(xué)及應(yīng)用語言學(xué)系教授。
Preface
Acknowledgements
Symbols and abbreviations
1. Introduction
1.1. What is pragmatics?
1.1.1. Adefinition
1.1.2. A brief history of pragmatics
1.1.3. Two main schools of thought in pragmatics： Anglo-American versus European Continental
1.2. Why pragmatics?
1.2.1. Linguistic underdeterminacy
1.2.2. Simplification of semantics and syntax
1.3. Some basic notions in semantics and pragmatics
1.3.1. Sentence， utterance， proposition
1.3.2. Context
1.3.3. Truth value， truth condition， entailment
1.4. Organization of the book
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

Part Ⅰ Central topics in pragmatics
2. Implicature
2.1. Classical Gricean theory of conversational implicature
2.1.1. The co-operative principle and the maxims of conversation
2.1.2. Relationship between the speaker and the maxims
2.1.3. Conversational implicatureo versus conversational implicature
2.1.4. Generalized versus particularized conversational implicature
2.1.5. Properties of conversational implicature
2.2. Two neo-Gricean pragmatic theories of conversational implicature
2.2.1. The Hornian system
2.2.2. The Levinsonian system
2.3. Conventional implicature
2.3.1. What is conventional implicature?
2.3.2. Properties of conventional implicature
2.4. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

3. Presupposition
3.1. What is presupposition?
3.2. Properties of presupposition
3.2.1. Constancy under negation
3.2.2. Defeasibility
3.2.3. The projection problem
3.3. Analyses
3.3.1. The filtering-satisfaction analysis
3.3.2. The cancellation analysis
3.3.3. The accommodation analysis
3.4. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

4. Speech acts
4.1. Performativesversus constatives
4.1.1. The performative/constative dichotomy
4.1.2. The performative hypothesis
4.2. Austins felicity conditions on performatives
4.3. Locutionary， illocutionary， and perlocutionary speech acts
4.4. Searles felicity conditions on speech acts
4.5. Searles typology of speech acts
4.6. Indirect speech acts
4.6.1. What is an indirect speech act?
4.6.2. How is an indirect speech act analysed?
4.6.3. Why is an indirect speech act used? Some remarks on politeness
4.7. Speech acts and culture
4.7.1. Cross-cultural variation
4.7.2. Interlanguage variation
4.8. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

5. Deixis
5.1. Preliminaries
5.1.1. Deictic versus non-deictic expression
5.1.2. Gestural versus symbolic use of a deictic expression
5.1.3. Deictic centre and deictic projection
5.2. Basic categories of deixis
5.2.1. Person deixis
5.2.2. Time deixis
5.2.3. Space deixis
5.3 Other categories of deixis
5.3.1. Social deixis
5.3.2. Discourse deixis
5.4. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

Part Ⅱ Pragmatics and its interfaces
6. Pragmatics and cognition： relevance theory
6.1. Relevance
6.1.1. The cognitive principle of relevance
6.1.2. The communicative principle of relevance
6.2. Explicature， implicature， and conceptual versus procedural meaning
6.2.1. Grice： what is said versus what is implicated
6.2.2. Explicature
6.2.3. Implicature
6.2.4. Conceptual versus procedural meaning
6.3. From Fodorian central process to submodule of theory of mind
6.3.1. Fodorian theory of cognitive modularity
6.3.2. Sperber and Wilsons earlier position： pragmatics as Fodorian central process
6.3.3. Sperber and Wilsons current position： pragmatics as submodule oftheory of mind
6.4. Relevance theory compared with classical/neo-Gricean theory
6.5. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

7. Pragmatics and semantics
7.1. Reductionism versus complementarism
7.2. Drawing the semantics-pragmatics distinction
7.2.1. Truth-conditional versus non-truth-conditional meaning
7.2.2. Conventional versus non-conventional meaning
7.2.3. Context independence versus context dependence
7.3. Pragmatic intrusion into what is said and the semantics-pragmatics interface
7.3.1. Grice： what is said versus what is implicated revisited
7.3.2. Relevance theorists： explicature
7.3.3. Recanati： the pragmatically enriched said
7.3.4. Bach： conversational impliciture
7.3.5. Can explicature/the pragmatically enriched said/impliciture be distinguished from implicature?
7.3.6. Levinson： conversational implicature
7.3.7. The five analyses compared
7.4. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings

8. Pragmatics and syntax
8.1. Chomskys views about language and linguistics
8.2. Chomskys binding theory
8.3. Problems for Chomskys binding theory
8.3.1. Binding condition A
8.3.2. Binding condition B
8.3.3. Complementarity between anaphors and pronominals
8.3.4. Binding condition C
8.4 A revised neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora
8.4.1. The general pattern of anaphora
8.4.2. A revised neo-Gricean pragmatic apparatus for anaphora
8.4.3. The binding patterns
8.4.4. Beyond the binding patterns
8.4.5. Logophoricity and emphaticness/contrastiveness
8.5. Theoretical implications
8.6. Summary
Key concepts
Exercises and essay questions
Further readings
Glossary
References
Suggested solutions to exercises
Index of names
Index of languages， language families， and language areas
Index of subjects

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：語用學(xué)，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。