高低水平中國英語學習者英語關系從句加工的ERP研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-08 21:15
【摘要】：針對印歐語系的研究普遍認為主語關系從句(SRs)比賓語關系從句(ORs)更具加工優(yōu)勢,而漢語研究結果表明,漢語中的ORs更具加工優(yōu)勢。此外,開始有研究關注到,關系從句的加工過程并不只涉及到句法層面的加工,關系從句中名詞生命性特征等語義因素也對這一過程產(chǎn)生較大影響,當從句中處于主語位置的名詞具有生命性時,關系從句的加工難度要比該位置的名詞具有非生命性時低�；谶@些研究成果,本研究以期解決下列三個問題:(1)中國英語學習者在加工英語關系從句時能否達到母語者水平?(2)學習者二語水平的高低是否會對關系從句的加工造成影響?(3)關系從句中所嵌名詞的生命性對關系從句的加工會產(chǎn)生什么作用?為解決以上問題,研究采用事件相關電位技術記錄被試的腦電數(shù)據(jù),并結合SPSS技術對所獲數(shù)據(jù)進行分析。實驗被試分為兩組:一組是高水平被試;一組是低水平被試。研究結果顯示,就行為數(shù)據(jù)而言,高水平被試加工主語關系從句的反應時要低于低水平的被試,而在正確率上兩組被試并不存在顯著差異。當從句中主語為非生命性且賓語為生命性時,被試的反應時要比加工主語為生命性且賓語為非生命性的從句長。就腦電數(shù)據(jù)而言,高水平的被試在300-400ms的時間窗口,ORs的加工激活了典型的N400成分,而且當從句中的主語為非生命性時,也出現(xiàn)了典型的N400成分。此外,當從句類型為SRs時,或者當從句中的主語具有生命性時,N400效應更為顯著。然而,在550-750ms的時間窗口,并沒有出現(xiàn)可靠的ERP成分。相較于高水平的被試,低水平的被試在加工四種不同條件的句子類型時并沒有激活顯著的腦電成分。上述研究結果表明高水平的英語學習者能夠同本族語者一樣,對主賓語關系從句之間的差異非常敏感,而低水平的中國英語學習者能夠成功對關系從句進行理解,但在加工過程中無法對主賓語關系從句進行明確的區(qū)分;關系從句中主語為生命性且賓語為非生命性時會促進關系從句的加工。這也說明句法和語義在關系從句的加工過程中是同時進行并相互作用的,并不是單純的句法優(yōu)先或是語義優(yōu)先。
[Abstract]:The research on Indo-European family generally thinks that the subject-relation clause (SRs) has more processing advantages than the object relative clause (ORs), while the Chinese research results show that the ORs in Chinese has more processing advantage. In addition, some researchers began to pay attention to the fact that the processing process of relative clauses is not only related to the processing of syntactic level, but also affected by semantic factors such as the life characteristics of nouns in relative clauses. When the noun in the position of the subject in the clause is lifelike, the processing difficulty of the relative clause is lower than that of the noun in the position. Based on these findings, The purpose of this study is to solve the following three problems: (1) can Chinese EFL learners reach the native language level in the processing of relative clauses? (2) will the level of L2 learners contribute to the processing of relative clauses? (3) what is the effect of the life of the noun embedded in the relative clause on the trade union of the relative clause? In order to solve the above problems, the EEG data of the subjects were recorded by event-related potential technique, and the obtained data were analyzed with SPSS technology. The subjects were divided into two groups: one was high-level subjects and the other was low-level subjects. The results show that, in terms of behavioral data, the reaction time of subjects in high level subjects is lower than that in low level subjects, but there is no significant difference in correct rate between the two groups. When the subject in the clause is inanimate and the object is lifelike, the reaction time of the subjects is longer than the clause in which the processing subject is lifelitic and the object is inanimate. As far as EEG data are concerned, the processing of ORs activates the typical N400 component in the time window of 300-400ms, and the typical N400 component appears when the subject of the clause is inanimate. In addition, the N400 effect is more significant when the clause type is SRs or when the subject in the clause is lifelike. However, in the 550-750ms time window, there is no reliable ERP component. Compared with the high level subjects, the low level subjects did not activate significant EEG components in processing the sentence types of four different conditions. The results show that high level English learners can be as sensitive as native speakers to the differences between subject-object clauses, while low-level Chinese EFL learners can successfully understand relative clauses. However, in the process of processing, there is no clear distinction between the relative clauses of subject and object; When the subject in the relative clause is life and the object is non-life, it will promote the processing of the relative clause. This also shows that syntax and semantics are simultaneous and interact in the processing of relative clauses, not simple syntactic precedence or semantic preference.
【學位授予單位】：南京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H319.3
本文編號：2405130
[Abstract]:The research on Indo-European family generally thinks that the subject-relation clause (SRs) has more processing advantages than the object relative clause (ORs), while the Chinese research results show that the ORs in Chinese has more processing advantage. In addition, some researchers began to pay attention to the fact that the processing process of relative clauses is not only related to the processing of syntactic level, but also affected by semantic factors such as the life characteristics of nouns in relative clauses. When the noun in the position of the subject in the clause is lifelike, the processing difficulty of the relative clause is lower than that of the noun in the position. Based on these findings, The purpose of this study is to solve the following three problems: (1) can Chinese EFL learners reach the native language level in the processing of relative clauses? (2) will the level of L2 learners contribute to the processing of relative clauses? (3) what is the effect of the life of the noun embedded in the relative clause on the trade union of the relative clause? In order to solve the above problems, the EEG data of the subjects were recorded by event-related potential technique, and the obtained data were analyzed with SPSS technology. The subjects were divided into two groups: one was high-level subjects and the other was low-level subjects. The results show that, in terms of behavioral data, the reaction time of subjects in high level subjects is lower than that in low level subjects, but there is no significant difference in correct rate between the two groups. When the subject in the clause is inanimate and the object is lifelike, the reaction time of the subjects is longer than the clause in which the processing subject is lifelitic and the object is inanimate. As far as EEG data are concerned, the processing of ORs activates the typical N400 component in the time window of 300-400ms, and the typical N400 component appears when the subject of the clause is inanimate. In addition, the N400 effect is more significant when the clause type is SRs or when the subject in the clause is lifelike. However, in the 550-750ms time window, there is no reliable ERP component. Compared with the high level subjects, the low level subjects did not activate significant EEG components in processing the sentence types of four different conditions. The results show that high level English learners can be as sensitive as native speakers to the differences between subject-object clauses, while low-level Chinese EFL learners can successfully understand relative clauses. However, in the process of processing, there is no clear distinction between the relative clauses of subject and object; When the subject in the relative clause is life and the object is non-life, it will promote the processing of the relative clause. This also shows that syntax and semantics are simultaneous and interact in the processing of relative clauses, not simple syntactic precedence or semantic preference.
【學位授予單位】：南京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H319.3
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前6條
1 王慧莉;馬麗雯;王鈾鈾;Melissa TROYER;李強;;漢英雙語者英語關系從句加工的ERP研究(英文)[J];Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics;2015年01期
2 常欣;王沛;;晚期漢-英二語者英語被動句句法加工的ERP研究[J];心理學報;2013年07期
3 何文廣;陳寶國;;句子加工中核心名詞動物性效應及其認知機制[J];心理科學進展;2013年03期
4 張強;楊亦鳴;;漢語賓語關系從句加工優(yōu)勢——來自神經(jīng)電生理學研究的證據(jù)[J];語言科學;2010年04期
5 周統(tǒng)權;鄭偉;舒華;楊亦鳴;;漢語賓語關系從句加工優(yōu)勢論——來自失語癥研究的證據(jù)[J];語言科學;2010年03期
6 陳寶國;寧愛華;;漢語主語和賓語關系從句加工難度的比較[J];應用心理學;2008年01期
，本文編號：2405130
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/2405130.html
最近更新
教材專著
