英漢形名組合的意義建構
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-12 17:35
【摘要】：眾所周知,形名組合是一種有效地拓展詞匯的構詞手段,在日常生活交際中起到重要的作用。正因為此,國內外學者對形名組合做過相關研究,如沈家煊(1977),呂叔湘(2014),Warren(1984),KampPartee(1995)等,但是以往的大多數(shù)研究主要集中在形容詞與名詞的句法關系,以及形名組合的語義關系方面。隨著認知科學的發(fā)展,也有一些語言學家開始從認知的視角來解釋形名組合的意義的產生,但是都缺乏完整、系統(tǒng)且具有普遍說服力的理論框架。本文擬將概念整合理論、物性結構理論以及Zeno Wendler的有關形容詞分類的理論相融合,推導并構建出意義建構模型,并以英漢形名組合為研究對象,從而驗證該模型在解讀形名組合意義建構時的強大力量以及英漢形名組合在意義建構時的共性。具體來說,本研究以Fauconnier的概念整合模型為基本的理論框架,以Pustejovesky的物性結構理論和Zeno Wendler有關形容詞分類的理論作為補充,嘗試構建一個更為具體可操作的意義建構模型。概念整合理論包括四個心智空間:兩個輸入空間,類屬空間,整合空間,使抽象的過程具體化,為意義的建構提供及時的在線的處理。物性結構理論包括構成、形式、功能、施事四個角色,內嵌在概念整合模型之中,給名詞的概念內容提供抽象的背景知識,為名詞語義的精細刻畫提供具體可操作的手段。Zeno Wendler有關形容詞分類的理論,使形容詞的研究不再局限于句法關系,而是聚焦于它的概念內容,為此把形容詞分為四類:自然屬性、量度、動態(tài)和評價四類形容詞,這為形容詞的概念特征提供理論依據(jù)。就本研究的研究對象而言,在現(xiàn)代漢語中,單音節(jié)形容詞具有恒定性和連續(xù)性的語義特征,是定語的典型成員,這與英語的定語形容詞在修飾名詞時具有相似的語義特征,即傳遞中心名詞的本質、內在特征,所以這樣的形名組合是連續(xù)組合,意義具有恒定性,與本研究契合度高,由此把漢語的單音節(jié)形容詞修飾名詞與英語的定語形容詞修飾名詞的形名組合作為本研究的研究對象。在此模型基礎上,本研究首先依據(jù)形名組合在意義建構過程中是否涉及隱喻和轉喻,將形名組合分為兩大類:(1)非隱喻和/或非轉喻形名組合詞;(2)隱喻和/或轉喻形名組合詞。其次,依據(jù)最終的意義建構是名詞還是形容詞亦或是整體發(fā)生隱喻或轉喻作用,把第二大類再細化為三類:a)A隱喻和/或轉喻,N非隱喻和/或轉喻;b)N隱喻和/或轉喻,A非隱喻和/或轉喻;c)AN整體隱喻和/或轉喻。最后,本研究利用上述模型重點對英漢形名組合中涉及隱轉喻的三種類型進行細致分析,從而解讀形名組合詞意義建構的過程。研究表明:(1)非隱喻和/或非轉喻形名組合在意義建構過程中,形容詞和名詞的相似概念特征激發(fā)了概念的整合;(2)形容詞隱喻和/或轉喻,名詞非隱喻和/或轉喻形名組合在意義建構過程中,形容詞隱喻和/或轉喻后的概念與名詞的物性特征存在相似之處,促使概念的整合;(3)名詞隱喻和/或轉喻,形容詞非隱喻和/或轉喻形名組合在意義建構過程中,名詞隱喻和/或轉喻后的物性特征與形容詞的相似概念相互映射,促使概念的整合;(4)形名組合整體隱喻和/或轉喻類形名組合在意義建構過程中,形容詞和名詞相似概念整合形成基本義,形名組合整體隱喻和/或轉喻后形成引申義。本研究從認知角度出發(fā)對英漢形名組合進行研究,解讀了形名組合意義建構的過程,但本研究也存在不足之處:本文選取的英漢形名組合是漢語的單音節(jié)形容詞修飾名詞與英語的定語形容詞修飾名詞的形名組合,這一模型是否適合其他類型的形名組合有待進一步研究;在分析形名組合意義建構時,存在一定的主觀性,其心理真實性也有待驗證,通過語料庫和實驗等方法有助于克服這些不足,尚需后續(xù)研究的進一步改善和深化。
[Abstract]:It is well known that the form-name combination is an effective way to expand the vocabulary and play an important role in the communication of daily life. Because of this, the domestic and foreign scholars have made relevant research on the combination of the shape names, such as Shen Family (1977), Lv Shuxiang (2014), Warren (1984), Kampong Paree (1995), etc., but most of the previous studies mainly focus on the syntactic relationship between the adjective and the noun, and the semantic relation of the form name combination. With the development of cognitive science, some linguists have begun to explain the meaning of the form-name combination from the cognitive perspective, but there is a lack of complete, systematic and persuasive theoretical framework. In this paper, it is proposed that the theory, physical structure theory and Zeno Wendler's theory of the classification of the adjectives are fused, the meaning construction model is derived and constructed, and the Chinese and English-shaped names are combined into the research object. so as to verify the strong power of the model in the interpretation of the combination meaning of the shape name and the commonness of the English-Chinese character combination in the meaning construction. In particular, this study takes the concept of Fauconnier as the basic theoretical framework, and tries to build a more concrete operational meaning construction model by using the theory of the property structure and the theory of the adjective classification of Zeno Wendler. The concept integration theory includes four mental spaces: the two input spaces, the class space and the whole space, the abstract process is concretized, and the timely and on-line processing is provided for the construction of the meaning. The theory of physical property structure includes four characters of structure, form, function and application. It is embedded in the whole model of the concept, provides abstract background knowledge for the concept of the noun, and provides a specific and operable means for the fine depiction of the semantic of the noun. Zeno Wendler is concerned with the theory of the classification of adjectives, so that the study of the adjective is no longer limited to the syntactic relationship, but is focused on the concept of the adjective. In this regard, the adjective is divided into four categories: the natural attribute, the measure, the dynamic and the evaluation of the four types of adjectives, which provides the theoretical basis for the concept of the adjective. For the research object of this study, in modern Chinese, the monosyllabic adjective has the semantic features of identity and continuity, and is a typical member of the attributive language. Therefore, the combination of the form names is a continuous combination, the meaning has the constant character, and the degree of fit with the present study is high, so that the combination of the monosyllabic adjective of Chinese and the form name of the attributive adjective modified noun in English is used as the research object of the study. On the basis of this model, the study is based on whether the form-name combination is involved in the metaphor and metonymy in the process of meaning construction, and the form-name combination is divided into two main categories: (1) non-metaphor and/ or non-metonymy name combination; (2) metaphor and/ or metonymy name combination. Secondly, the second major class is subdivided into three categories: a) A metaphor and/ or metonymy, N non-metaphor and/ or metonymy, b) N metaphor and/ or metonymy, A non-metaphor and/ or metonymy; c) AN integral metaphor and/ or metonymy. In the end, this study uses the above model to analyze the three types of implicit metonymy in the English-Chinese character combination, so as to interpret the process of the meaning construction of the word-name combination. The research shows that: (1) the combination of non-metaphor and/ or non-metonymy name has inspired the integration of the concept in the process of meaning construction; (2) the combination of the adjective metaphor and/ or metonymy, the noun non-metaphor and/ or the metonymy name is in the process of meaning construction, The concept of adjective metaphor and/ or metonymy is similar to the physical characteristics of the noun, which causes the integration of the concept; (3) the noun metaphor and/ or metonymy, the adjective non-metaphor and/ or the metonymy name combination are in the meaning construction process, The physical characteristics of the term metaphor and/ or metonymy and the similar concepts of the adjectives are mapped to each other, so as to promote the integration of the concept; (4) the combination of the shape name and the whole metaphor and/ or the metonymy-shaped name combination form the basic meaning in the meaning construction process, the adjective and the noun-like concept, The form name is used to combine the whole metaphor and/ or metonymy to form the meaning. This study, from the perspective of cognition, studies the combination of English and Chinese characters, and explains the process of the construction of the form-name combination meaning, but the present study also has the disadvantages: In this paper, the combination of Chinese and English-style names is a combination of the monosyllabic adjective-modified noun of Chinese and the form-name combination of the attributive adjective-modified noun in English. The model is suitable for the combination of other types of shape names to be further studied; in the construction of the analysis-type name combination, There are some subjectivity, and its psychological authenticity is still to be verified. Through the method of corpus and experiment, it is helpful to overcome these deficiencies, and the further improvement and deepening of the follow-up study will be needed.
【學位授予單位】：揚州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H146.3;H314.3
本文編號：2375007
[Abstract]:It is well known that the form-name combination is an effective way to expand the vocabulary and play an important role in the communication of daily life. Because of this, the domestic and foreign scholars have made relevant research on the combination of the shape names, such as Shen Family (1977), Lv Shuxiang (2014), Warren (1984), Kampong Paree (1995), etc., but most of the previous studies mainly focus on the syntactic relationship between the adjective and the noun, and the semantic relation of the form name combination. With the development of cognitive science, some linguists have begun to explain the meaning of the form-name combination from the cognitive perspective, but there is a lack of complete, systematic and persuasive theoretical framework. In this paper, it is proposed that the theory, physical structure theory and Zeno Wendler's theory of the classification of the adjectives are fused, the meaning construction model is derived and constructed, and the Chinese and English-shaped names are combined into the research object. so as to verify the strong power of the model in the interpretation of the combination meaning of the shape name and the commonness of the English-Chinese character combination in the meaning construction. In particular, this study takes the concept of Fauconnier as the basic theoretical framework, and tries to build a more concrete operational meaning construction model by using the theory of the property structure and the theory of the adjective classification of Zeno Wendler. The concept integration theory includes four mental spaces: the two input spaces, the class space and the whole space, the abstract process is concretized, and the timely and on-line processing is provided for the construction of the meaning. The theory of physical property structure includes four characters of structure, form, function and application. It is embedded in the whole model of the concept, provides abstract background knowledge for the concept of the noun, and provides a specific and operable means for the fine depiction of the semantic of the noun. Zeno Wendler is concerned with the theory of the classification of adjectives, so that the study of the adjective is no longer limited to the syntactic relationship, but is focused on the concept of the adjective. In this regard, the adjective is divided into four categories: the natural attribute, the measure, the dynamic and the evaluation of the four types of adjectives, which provides the theoretical basis for the concept of the adjective. For the research object of this study, in modern Chinese, the monosyllabic adjective has the semantic features of identity and continuity, and is a typical member of the attributive language. Therefore, the combination of the form names is a continuous combination, the meaning has the constant character, and the degree of fit with the present study is high, so that the combination of the monosyllabic adjective of Chinese and the form name of the attributive adjective modified noun in English is used as the research object of the study. On the basis of this model, the study is based on whether the form-name combination is involved in the metaphor and metonymy in the process of meaning construction, and the form-name combination is divided into two main categories: (1) non-metaphor and/ or non-metonymy name combination; (2) metaphor and/ or metonymy name combination. Secondly, the second major class is subdivided into three categories: a) A metaphor and/ or metonymy, N non-metaphor and/ or metonymy, b) N metaphor and/ or metonymy, A non-metaphor and/ or metonymy; c) AN integral metaphor and/ or metonymy. In the end, this study uses the above model to analyze the three types of implicit metonymy in the English-Chinese character combination, so as to interpret the process of the meaning construction of the word-name combination. The research shows that: (1) the combination of non-metaphor and/ or non-metonymy name has inspired the integration of the concept in the process of meaning construction; (2) the combination of the adjective metaphor and/ or metonymy, the noun non-metaphor and/ or the metonymy name is in the process of meaning construction, The concept of adjective metaphor and/ or metonymy is similar to the physical characteristics of the noun, which causes the integration of the concept; (3) the noun metaphor and/ or metonymy, the adjective non-metaphor and/ or the metonymy name combination are in the meaning construction process, The physical characteristics of the term metaphor and/ or metonymy and the similar concepts of the adjectives are mapped to each other, so as to promote the integration of the concept; (4) the combination of the shape name and the whole metaphor and/ or the metonymy-shaped name combination form the basic meaning in the meaning construction process, the adjective and the noun-like concept, The form name is used to combine the whole metaphor and/ or metonymy to form the meaning. This study, from the perspective of cognition, studies the combination of English and Chinese characters, and explains the process of the construction of the form-name combination meaning, but the present study also has the disadvantages: In this paper, the combination of Chinese and English-style names is a combination of the monosyllabic adjective-modified noun of Chinese and the form-name combination of the attributive adjective-modified noun in English. The model is suitable for the combination of other types of shape names to be further studied; in the construction of the analysis-type name combination, There are some subjectivity, and its psychological authenticity is still to be verified. Through the method of corpus and experiment, it is helpful to overcome these deficiencies, and the further improvement and deepening of the follow-up study will be needed.
【學位授予單位】：揚州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H146.3;H314.3
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 楊挺;從語言邏輯看形名與刑名的承啟關系[J];成都大學學報(社會科學版);2000年01期
2 楊鋼元;;形名學或記號學:記號、信號、符號,誰是誰?[J];國際新聞界;2008年01期
3 貢華南;;從無形、形名到形而上——“形而上”道路之生成[J];學術月刊;2009年06期
4 劉錚;;形名學對先秦思想的意義[J];思想戰(zhàn)線;2013年S1期
5 郭齊勇;《恒先》——道法家形名思想的佚篇[J];江漢論壇;2004年08期
6 黃田;;論英語“形名”結構的漢譯[J];懷化學院學報;2008年03期
7 謝遐齡;;釋“分”[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);1990年03期
8 曾成棟;李楚梅;;英語“形名”結構對譯與轉譯的語義依據(jù)[J];考試周刊;2007年15期
9 郭梨華;《經法》中“形—名”思想探源[J];安徽大學學報;1998年03期
10 王嘉民;也說“形名錯位”——與馮廣藝先生商榷[J];修辭學習;1994年04期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 趙春利;形名組合的靜態(tài)與動態(tài)研究[D];暨南大學;2006年
相關碩士學位論文 前5條
1 李耀;韓非“形名”與“刑名”思想研究[D];蘭州大學;2016年
2 徐華珍;中國英語學習者口頭敘事語篇中形名搭配的母語遷移研究[D];曲阜師范大學;2016年
3 段傳順;交際中英語“形名結構”的認知研究[D];寧波大學;2009年
4 錢蕊;漢語形名復合詞認知語義研究[D];山東財經大學;2014年
5 劉琦;論形容詞的非多義性：形容詞在形名組合中的討論[D];浙江大學;2006年
，本文編號：2375007
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/2375007.html
最近更新
教材專著
