本文選題：語言哲學 + 語用學�。� 參考：《黑龍江大學》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：語義模糊性是語言的自然屬性,普遍存在于語言的各個方面,在人類社會的認知與交際中發(fā)揮極為重要的作用。本文按照從理論基礎考察到理論系統(tǒng)構建再到理論分析與解釋的思路,結合語言學、語言哲學、認識科學、社會學、心理學等學科,對日語語義模糊性的生成機制與存在方式進行探索。由于語義模糊性研究尚未形成完整的體系,所以日語語義模糊性的研究只能在語言學語義模糊性研究的基礎上展開。本文理論基礎分析部分通過對語義模糊性產生機制的追問與存在形式的考察,揭示語義模糊性產生的哲學根源,對日語語義模糊性表達進行類型分析,總結日語語義模糊性的特征。文章理論構建部分將語用學、語義學等學科對語義模糊性的定義及相關概念進行整合,發(fā)現(xiàn)語義模糊性在語義學與語用學層面存在形式的外在差別與內在聯(lián)系,認為語義模糊性研究應在語義學層面與語用學層面分別進行。嘗試性提出語義模糊性研究的方法與路徑,初步建立系統(tǒng)的語義模糊性研究框架,強調語義模糊性作為獨立學科進行研究的必要性。在本論文的理論分析與解釋部分,對語義模糊性在語義學與語用學層面的存在形式與生成機制進行進一步分析與解釋。在語義學層面,從語義范疇維度切入,尋找語義模糊性,特別是日語語義模糊性存在的本質特征;在語用學層面,以關聯(lián)理論為理論基礎,考察人類交際活動中的關聯(lián)性與語義模糊性的關系。歸納語用學層面語義模糊性的特點,研究語法化的發(fā)生、發(fā)展與語義模糊性的內在聯(lián)系,總結語言發(fā)展的一般規(guī)律。并嘗試利用以上研究結論解釋語義學層面的反訓、比喻等語言現(xiàn)象以及語用學層面的語法化、言語行為、交際參與者主觀性等問題。最后,利用語義模糊性研究結論,結合日語本體特征,解釋日語中得體表達、間接言語行為等現(xiàn)象。從日本民族文化方面對日本社會的認知方式、文化形成以及交際活動特點進行分析與解釋。以考察語義模糊性的理論基礎、嘗試建立語義模糊性研究框架、解釋日常語言存在的問題為本文的研究重點與研究目的,期望能為推動語義模糊性研究,特別是日語語義模糊性研究做出貢獻。
[Abstract]:Semantic fuzziness is the natural attribute of language, which generally exists in all aspects of language and plays an extremely important role in the cognition and communication of human society. This article is based on the theoretical basis of the study of theoretical system construction and theoretical analysis and interpretation, combining linguistics, language philosophy, knowledge of science, sociology, psychology and other studies. The study of semantic fuzziness in Japanese is explored. Since the study of semantic fuzziness has not yet formed a complete system, the study of semantic fuzziness in Japanese can only be carried out on the basis of the study of linguistic fuzziness. The study of the form of existence reveals the philosophical origin of semantic fuzziness, analyzes the fuzzy expression of Japanese semantic, and summarizes the characteristics of semantic fuzziness in Japanese. The theoretical construction of this article integrates the definition of semantic fuzziness and related concepts in the fields of pragmatics and semantics, and finds that semantic fuzziness is in semantics and in semantics. On the level of pragmatics, there are external and internal relations of forms. It is believed that the study of semantic fuzziness should be carried out separately in semantics and pragmatics. The method and path of semantic fuzziness are tentatively proposed, and a systematic framework for semantic fuzziness is established, and it is necessary to emphasize the necessity of semantic fuzziness as an independent subject. In the theoretical analysis and interpretation part of this thesis, we further analyze and explain the form and mechanism of semantic fuzziness in semantics and pragmatics. In semantics, the semantic fuzziness, especially the essential characteristics of the ambiguity of Japanese meaning, is found from the semantic category dimension; in pragmatics level, On the basis of relevance theory, the relationship between relevance and semantic fuzziness in human communication is investigated. The characteristics of semantic fuzziness in pragmatics are summed up, the occurrence of grammaticalization, the internal relationship between development and semantic fuzziness, and the general rules of language development are summarized. The phenomenon of anti training, metaphor and other linguistic phenomena, the grammaticalization of pragmatics, speech act, and subjectivity of the participants in communication. Finally, using semantic fuzziness to study the conclusions and combine the Japanese noumenon features to explain the appropriate expression in Japanese and indirect speech act. The characteristics of formation and communication activities are analyzed and explained. In order to investigate the theoretical basis of semantic fuzziness, try to establish the framework of semantic fuzziness, explain the problems in the daily language, and to make contributions to the research of semantic fuzziness, especially the semantic fuzziness of Japanese.
【學位授予單位】：黑龍江大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：H36
，

本文編號：1939924