漢語(yǔ)直接請(qǐng)求行為中的禮貌策略研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2023-08-14 19:48
請(qǐng)求,是日常生活中常見的一種行為。截至目前,很多研究者已經(jīng)對(duì)請(qǐng)求策略和影響因素進(jìn)行了探討。其中,大多數(shù)研究者聚焦于請(qǐng)求策略的宏觀層面,即請(qǐng)求策略的直(間)接程度。同時(shí),很多研究者贊同Brown&Levinson(1978,1987)的主張,認(rèn)為挽救面子是驅(qū)動(dòng)人們禮貌地發(fā)出請(qǐng)求的主要因素。然而,這些研究有其不足之處。首先,只關(guān)注宏觀層面的請(qǐng)求策略無法全面揭示中國(guó)語(yǔ)境下的請(qǐng)求機(jī)制。有學(xué)者做出解釋指出,在中國(guó),若僅從宏觀層面來看,很多人傾向使用直接請(qǐng)求策略,然而,這并不代表中國(guó)人粗魯、不懂禮貌。實(shí)際上,在中國(guó),人們常常用各種各樣的禮貌策略來修飾這些直接請(qǐng)求。然而,很少有學(xué)者對(duì)這些微觀的禮貌策略進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)地研究。其次,當(dāng)探討人們?cè)谡?qǐng)求話語(yǔ)中使用禮貌策略的深層原因時(shí),研究者往往過分強(qiáng)調(diào)面子因素而忽略其他關(guān)系因素。為了填補(bǔ)以上研究空白,本研究旨在回答下列問題:中國(guó)人是否經(jīng)常使用直接請(qǐng)求?若是,人們是否使用禮貌策略來修飾這些直接請(qǐng)求?這些禮貌策略具體是什么?除此之外,本文借鑒Spencer-Oatey(2008)的人際關(guān)系管理理論,在關(guān)系視角下,更加全面地探討人們使用禮貌策略背后的深層原因。為...
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】:103 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Objectives of the Study
1.3 Significance of the Study
1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Politeness
2.1.1 Politeness Defined
2.1.2 Approaches to Politeness
2.1.2.1 The Traditional Approach
2.1.2.2 The Post-modern Approach
2.2 Request
2.2.1 The Theoretical Development of Request
2.2.2 Empirical Studies on Requests
2.2.2.1 Request Strategies
2.2.2.2 Influencing Factors
2.2.2.3 Development of Pragmatic Competence
2.3 Research Gaps
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 The CCSARP Model
3.2 Brown and Levinson' Politeness Theory
3.2.1 The Concept of Face
3.2.2 Politeness Strategies
3.2.2.1 Positive Politeness Strategies
3.2.2.2 Negative Politeness Strategies
3.2.3 Critiques against Brown and Levinson's Politeness Theory
3.3 Rapport Management Theory
3.3.1 Dimensions of Rapport Management
3.3.1.1 Face
3.3.1.2 Sociality Rights and Obligations
3.3.1.3 Interactional Goals
3.3.2 Request as a Rapport Threatening Behavior
3.4 Theoretical Framework of the Study
Chapter Four Methodology
4.1 Research Questions
4.2 Data Description
4.3 Selection Criteria
4.4 Data Collection
4.5 Research Procedures
Chapter Five Results and Discussion
5.1 Request Strategies Used in Moment in Peking
5.2 Politeness Strategies
5.2.1 Avoiding Coercion
5.2.2 Conveying that S and H Are Cooperators
5.2.3 Claiming Common Ground
5.2.4 Communicating S's wants not to impinge on H
5.2.5 Redressing Other Wants of H's
5.2.6 The Synthesis of Politeness Strategies
5.3 Reasons for the Use of Politeness Strategies
5.3.1 Face
5.3.2 Social Rights and Obligations
5.3.3 Interactional Goals
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Summary of the Major Findings
6.2 Limitations of the Study
6.3 Suggestions for Future Study
References
Acknowledgements
學(xué)位論文評(píng)閱及答辯情況表
本文編號(hào):3841949
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】:103 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Objectives of the Study
1.3 Significance of the Study
1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
2.1 Politeness
2.1.1 Politeness Defined
2.1.2 Approaches to Politeness
2.1.2.1 The Traditional Approach
2.1.2.2 The Post-modern Approach
2.2 Request
2.2.1 The Theoretical Development of Request
2.2.2 Empirical Studies on Requests
2.2.2.1 Request Strategies
2.2.2.2 Influencing Factors
2.2.2.3 Development of Pragmatic Competence
2.3 Research Gaps
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
3.1 The CCSARP Model
3.2 Brown and Levinson' Politeness Theory
3.2.1 The Concept of Face
3.2.2 Politeness Strategies
3.2.2.1 Positive Politeness Strategies
3.2.2.2 Negative Politeness Strategies
3.2.3 Critiques against Brown and Levinson's Politeness Theory
3.3 Rapport Management Theory
3.3.1 Dimensions of Rapport Management
3.3.1.1 Face
3.3.1.2 Sociality Rights and Obligations
3.3.1.3 Interactional Goals
3.3.2 Request as a Rapport Threatening Behavior
3.4 Theoretical Framework of the Study
Chapter Four Methodology
4.1 Research Questions
4.2 Data Description
4.3 Selection Criteria
4.4 Data Collection
4.5 Research Procedures
Chapter Five Results and Discussion
5.1 Request Strategies Used in Moment in Peking
5.2 Politeness Strategies
5.2.1 Avoiding Coercion
5.2.2 Conveying that S and H Are Cooperators
5.2.3 Claiming Common Ground
5.2.4 Communicating S's wants not to impinge on H
5.2.5 Redressing Other Wants of H's
5.2.6 The Synthesis of Politeness Strategies
5.3 Reasons for the Use of Politeness Strategies
5.3.1 Face
5.3.2 Social Rights and Obligations
5.3.3 Interactional Goals
Chapter Six Conclusion
6.1 Summary of the Major Findings
6.2 Limitations of the Study
6.3 Suggestions for Future Study
References
Acknowledgements
學(xué)位論文評(píng)閱及答辯情況表
本文編號(hào):3841949
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiboshi/3841949.html
最近更新
教材專著