本研究基于Skehan的權(quán)衡假說和Robinson的認(rèn)知假說,對(duì)大連海事大學(xué)法學(xué)專業(yè)60名大二學(xué)生議論文兩稿寫作進(jìn)行了研究,探究其語(yǔ)言復(fù)雜性和準(zhǔn)確性在一稿和二稿中分別呈現(xiàn)出何種關(guān)系,及其在兩稿中關(guān)系有何種變化,并對(duì)其影響因素進(jìn)行分析。對(duì)于語(yǔ)言準(zhǔn)確性,本研究采用無錯(cuò)誤T單位與T單位之比（Error-free T-units per T-unit）的分析方法。對(duì)于語(yǔ)言復(fù)雜性的兩個(gè)方面,使用每個(gè)T單位中子句的數(shù)量（Clauses per T-unit）對(duì)句法復(fù)雜性進(jìn)行分析,使用CLAN計(jì)算出的D值分析詞匯復(fù)雜性。研究結(jié)果表明:（1）在一稿中,句法復(fù)雜性、詞匯復(fù)雜性和語(yǔ)言準(zhǔn)確性之間均呈負(fù)相關(guān),為相互競(jìng)爭(zhēng)關(guān)系;句法復(fù)雜性和詞匯復(fù)雜性之間呈正相關(guān),二者共同發(fā)展。（2）在二稿中,句法復(fù)雜性和語(yǔ)言準(zhǔn)確性之間呈顯著正相關(guān),二者共同發(fā)展;雖然詞匯復(fù)雜性和語(yǔ)言準(zhǔn)確性以及句法復(fù)雜性和詞匯復(fù)雜性之間也呈正相關(guān),但其相關(guān)性不具有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。（3）通過任務(wù)重復(fù)的兩稿寫作,句法復(fù)雜性和語(yǔ)言準(zhǔn)確性之間的關(guān)系由一稿中的負(fù)相關(guān)變?yōu)槎逯械娘@著正相關(guān),二者之間由相互競(jìng)爭(zhēng)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楣餐l(fā)展。二稿中的句法復(fù)雜性和語(yǔ)言準(zhǔn)確性顯著高于一... 

【文章來源】：大連海事大學(xué)遼寧省211工程院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：89 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
ABSTRACT
List of Abbreviations
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Research purpose and significance
    1.3 Layout of the thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 The Trade-off Hypothesis
        2.1.1 Introduction to the Trade-off Hypothesis
        2.1.2 Empirical studies based on the Trade-off Hypothesis
    2.2 The Cognition Hypothesis
        2.2.1 Introduction to the Cognition Hypothesis
        2.2.2 Empirical studies based on the Cognition Hypothesis
    2.3 Linguistic complexity and accuracy
        2.3.1 Introduction to linguistic complexity and accuracy
        2.3.2 Empirical studies on linguistic complexity and accuracy
    2.4 Task repetition
        2.4.1 Introduction to task repetition
        2.4.2 Empirical studies on task repetition
Chapter 3 Methodology
    3.1 Research questions
    3.2 Data collection
    3.3 Instruments applied in the research
        3.3.1 Data cleaning
        3.3.2 Data processing software
        3.3.3 Data analysis
Chapter 4 Results and Discussion
    4.1 Overall description of SC, LC and accuracy in the first-draft
        4.1.1 Characteristics of SC, LC and accuracy in the first-draft
        4.1.2 Relationship among SC, LC and accuracy in the first-draft
    4.2 Overall description of SC, LC and accuracy in the second-draft
        4.2.1 Characteristics of SC, LC and accuracy in the second-draft
        4.2.2 Relationship among SC, LC and accuracy in the second-draft
    4.3 Changes of SC, LC and accuracy between the first- and second-draft
        4.3.1 Change of SC between the first- and second-draft
        4.3.2 Change of LC between the first- and second-draft
        4.3.3 Change of accuracy between the first- and second-draft
        4.3.4 Summary
    4.4 Discussion
        4.4.1 Relationship between linguistic complexity and accuracy in two drafts
        4.4.2 Change of the relationship between SC and accuracy in two draft
Chapter 5 Conclusion
    5.1 Major findings
    5.2 Implications
        5.2.1 Theoretical implication
        5.2.2 Pedagogical implication
    5.3 Limitations and suggestions
References
Appendix
Acknowledgements
Resume


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者口語(yǔ)復(fù)雜性、準(zhǔn)確性的動(dòng)態(tài)發(fā)展研究[J]. 于涵靜,戴煒棟.  外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2019(02)
[2]“師生合作評(píng)價(jià)”的辯證研究[J]. 孫曙光.  現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ). 2019(03)
[3]任務(wù)重復(fù)對(duì)學(xué)術(shù)英語(yǔ)寫作的影響:以動(dòng)態(tài)系統(tǒng)理論為視角[J]. 雷鵬飛,徐錦芬.  外語(yǔ)界. 2018(05)
[4]頻次對(duì)二語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者語(yǔ)塊使用準(zhǔn)確性的影響[J]. 周丹丹,范昆盟.  外語(yǔ)研究. 2018(02)
[5]高水平學(xué)習(xí)者語(yǔ)言復(fù)雜度的多維發(fā)展研究[J]. 鄭詠滟.  外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究. 2018(02)
[6]學(xué)習(xí)者句法與詞匯復(fù)雜性發(fā)展的動(dòng)態(tài)系統(tǒng)研究[J]. 鄭詠滟,馮予力.  現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ). 2017(01)
[7]二語(yǔ)寫作句法表現(xiàn)的動(dòng)態(tài)發(fā)展[J]. 江韋姍,王同順.  現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ). 2015(04)
[8]中國(guó)英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者書面語(yǔ)水平發(fā)展個(gè)案動(dòng)態(tài)研究[J]. 王海華,李貝貝,許琳.  外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究. 2015(01)
[9]頻次效應(yīng)對(duì)二語(yǔ)讀寫任務(wù)的影響研究[J]. 周丹丹,伊娜.  解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào). 2014(06)
[10]英語(yǔ)寫作的詞匯豐富性發(fā)展特征——一項(xiàng)基于自建語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的縱貫研究[J]. 朱慧敏,王俊菊.  外語(yǔ)界. 2013(06)



本文編號(hào)：3621821