合作原則是描述說話人和聽話人之間為產(chǎn)生有效會話而進行合作的一種重要語言學理論。近年來,越來越多的學者開始研究合作原則在口譯中的運用。此外,他們也開始注意到違反合作原則可以提高口譯的質量。本論文旨在找出更多信息,解釋違反合作原則的每一條準則的具體作用,并找出最有助于口譯質量的提高,且對口譯質量危害最小的違反。本論文的研究方法是定量研究,包括口譯實驗、問卷調查和訪談�；诤献髟瓌t,通過對十名學生口譯員口譯表現(xiàn)的定量分析,得出三個主要結論。首先,在大多數(shù)情況下,隨著對質量準則、方式準則和關聯(lián)準則的違反增加,口譯質量下降。其次,數(shù)量準則的違反是不受其他三個準則的違反的影響的變量,也不影響其他三個準則的違反。最后,違反數(shù)量準則能提高口譯的質量,但前提是口譯員要遵循一個原則,即違反其他三條準則越少越好。這些發(fā)現(xiàn)也證明,在四種違反中,違反數(shù)量準則最有助于口譯質量的提高且對口譯質量危害最小。本論文可以為口譯員在口譯過程中違反合作原則的四條準則時提供更明智、更安全的選擇策略。然后譯員便可以進一步提高口譯質量。此外,本論文還為進一步研究合作原則在口譯中的應用提供了啟發(fā)。 

【文章來源】：上海外國語大學上海市 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：69 頁

【學位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
摘要
Abstract
Introduction
    Research Background
    Significance of Thesis
    Structure of Thesis
Chapter One Literature Review
    1.1 Studies on Violation of Cooperative Principle（CP）in Normal Conversations
        1.1.1 Studies at Home and Overseas
        1.1.2 Inspirations from Previous Studies
    1.2 Studies on Violation of Cooperative Principle（CP）in Interpretations
Chapter Two Theoretical Framework
    2.1 Cooperative Principle（CP）
    2.2 Violation of Cooperative Principle（CP）in Interpretations
        2.2.1 Necessity of Violation
        2.2.2 Significance of Experiment
Chapter Three Research Methodology
    3.1 Experiment Design
        3.1.1 Materials for Experiment
        3.1.2 Samples and Equipment for Experiment
    3.2 Experiment Process
    3.3 Questionnaire Design
    3.4 Interview Design
    3.5 Assessment Method
        3.5.1 Implementation of Standard of Fidelity in Assessment
        3.5.2 Implementation of Standard of Delivery in Assessment
        3.5.3 Implementation of Standard of Language in Assessment
        3.5.4 Implementation of Standard of Time Control in Assessment
    3.6 Quantitative Analysis
Chapter Four Result Analysis and Discussion
    4.1 Analysis of the First Interpreting Experiment
    4.2 Analysis of the Second Interpreting Experiment
        4.2.1 Analysis of Line Charts
        4.2.2 Analysis of Combination Charts
    4.3 Examples of Findings in the Second Interpreting Experiment
        4.3.1 Examples with Few Violations of the Maxim of Quantity
        4.3.2 Examples with Plenty of Violations of the Maxim of Quantity
        4.3.3 Analysis of Interpreting Processes in Examples
    4.4 Analysis of Questionnaire for Supplement
Conclusion
    Major Findings
    Limitations and Ideas for Further Research
Bibliography
Appendix 1:Spare Time（the First Interpreting Material for the Experiment）
Appendix 2:Economics Misunderstanding（the Second Interpreting Material for theExperiment）
Appendix 3:Questionnaire for the Interpreting Experiment
Appendix 4:Specific Scores of the Interpreters in the Experiment（Two Tables）



本文編號：3024819