【摘要】：違實(shí)是人類的一種普遍的思維活動(dòng),它可以表達(dá)與現(xiàn)實(shí)相反的語(yǔ)義,展現(xiàn)語(yǔ)言的藝術(shù)。國(guó)外對(duì)違實(shí)的研究已經(jīng)有相當(dāng)長(zhǎng)的歷史,哲學(xué)、邏輯學(xué)、心理學(xué)和語(yǔ)言學(xué)等諸多領(lǐng)域的學(xué)者從不同角度對(duì)表示違實(shí)意義的條件句進(jìn)行了研究。然而,他們很少關(guān)注違實(shí)意義建構(gòu)的認(rèn)知過程。英漢在違實(shí)語(yǔ)義的表達(dá)上存在顯著差異,英語(yǔ)有明顯的屈折變化,而漢語(yǔ)依賴于言語(yǔ)的復(fù)雜關(guān)系。因此,對(duì)漢語(yǔ)違實(shí)條件句的研究更是少之又少。本文旨在從認(rèn)知語(yǔ)義學(xué)的角度研究漢語(yǔ)違實(shí)條件句意義構(gòu)建的問題。從這一角度研究違實(shí)條件句可更全面地探索漢語(yǔ)違實(shí)條件句及其理解過程中動(dòng)態(tài)的概念整合。本文以概念整合理論為理論框架,探究漢語(yǔ)違實(shí)條件句的獨(dú)特特征,以及違實(shí)語(yǔ)義的在線建構(gòu)過程。本研究試圖回答以下三個(gè)問題:第一,漢語(yǔ)是否有違實(shí)句?如果有,漢語(yǔ)是否有典型的違實(shí)標(biāo)記?第二,在句法、語(yǔ)法、語(yǔ)用層面上,漢語(yǔ)違實(shí)條件句有哪些表達(dá)特征?第三,概念整合理論下,不同特征是如何相互作用并進(jìn)行意義在線構(gòu)建的?在具體語(yǔ)境中,它們的語(yǔ)用功能是什么?本文的研究方法主要是以北京大學(xué)CCL語(yǔ)料庫(kù)為基礎(chǔ)的內(nèi)省法,考察漢語(yǔ)違實(shí)條件句在概念整合理論下的認(rèn)知過程。這可以深入揭示心智空間、相互映射和在線建構(gòu)的產(chǎn)生機(jī)制。研究結(jié)果表明:漢語(yǔ)有違實(shí)條件句,但沒有典型的違實(shí)標(biāo)記。概念整合理論視角下,違實(shí)語(yǔ)義的產(chǎn)生機(jī)制是一個(gè)復(fù)雜的在線建構(gòu)過程,涉及句法、語(yǔ)法、語(yǔ)境等諸多因素,印歐語(yǔ)與漢語(yǔ)在這個(gè)問題上并不存在質(zhì)的區(qū)別。本文認(rèn)為,對(duì)違實(shí)句進(jìn)行認(rèn)知語(yǔ)義學(xué)的分析可揭示違實(shí)和違實(shí)理解中所涉及到的思維過程和概念組合,可部分地揭示人類語(yǔ)言使用和理解過程中現(xiàn)象的本質(zhì)。因此,本研究可幫助人們更好地探究人類思維的實(shí)質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:False reality is a kind of universal thinking activity of human beings. It can express the semantics contrary to reality and show the art of language. There has been a long history in the study of false reality abroad. Scholars in many fields such as philosophy logic psychology and linguistics have studied conditionals from different angles. However, they pay little attention to the cognitive process of the construction of unreal meaning. There are significant differences between English and Chinese in the expression of pragmatic semantics. English has obvious inflectional changes, while Chinese depends on the complex relationship of speech. Therefore, the study of Chinese false conditional sentences is even less. The purpose of this paper is to study the construction of the meaning of Chinese metaphorical sentences from the perspective of cognitive semantics. From this point of view, it is possible to probe into the dynamic conceptual integration of Chinese false conditional sentences and their understanding process in a more comprehensive way. Based on the theory of conceptual integration, this paper explores the unique features of Chinese false conditionals and the online construction process of false semantics. This study attempts to answer the following three questions: first, are there any untrue sentences in Chinese? If so, does Chinese have typical false markers? Second, at the syntactic and pragmatic level, what are the expressive features of Chinese metaphysical conditional sentences? Thirdly, under the theory of conceptual integration, how do different features interact and construct meaning online? What are their pragmatic functions in specific contexts? Based on the introspection method of CCL corpus of Peking University, this paper investigates the cognitive process of Chinese unreal conditional sentences under the theory of conceptual integration. This can reveal the generation mechanism of mental space, mutual mapping and online construction. The results show that Chinese is not a typical metaphysical marker. From the perspective of Conceptual Integration Theory, the production mechanism of unreal semantics is a complex online construction process, involving syntax, context and many other factors. There is no qualitative difference between Indo-European and Chinese on this issue. This paper holds that the analysis of cognitive semantics can reveal the process of thinking and the combination of concepts involved in the understanding of reality and reality, and partly reveal the nature of the phenomena in the process of human language use and understanding. Therefore, this study can help people to better explore the essence of human thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H146.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 周貝;李曉雙;邱俊杰;張鋒;;建構(gòu)水平對(duì)反事實(shí)思維方向的影響[J];應(yīng)用心理學(xué);2016年01期

2 雍茜;;違實(shí)句的形態(tài)類型及漢語(yǔ)違實(shí)句[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2015年01期

3 雍茜;;違實(shí)條件句的類型學(xué)研究[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2014年03期

4 陳國(guó)華;英漢假設(shè)條件句比較[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;1988年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2210927