本文選題：“還” + “更”��； 參考：《四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：陸儉明(1980)在《“還”和“更”》中最早提到了“還”和“更”的研究。陸儉明主要從句式“X比Y[]W”重點(diǎn)分析了“還”和“更”的異同。他認(rèn)為,語(yǔ)義上二者都可表示程度增加。不同之處在于“更”包含遞進(jìn)發(fā)展的含義,而“還”包含轉(zhuǎn)折變化的含義。隨后,“還”和“更”在比較句中的研究日益豐富起來(lái)。主要焦點(diǎn)集中在三點(diǎn):第一,二者的語(yǔ)義�！斑�”和“更”在比較結(jié)構(gòu)中,都表示程度增加。第二,二者的預(yù)設(shè)義。殷志平(1995)、沈家煊(2001)、呂叔湘(2005)認(rèn)為,“還”和“更”在比較句中的預(yù)設(shè)是標(biāo)準(zhǔn)比較項(xiàng)(Y)具有一定程度W。另一種觀點(diǎn),宗守云(2011)認(rèn)為,“還”的預(yù)設(shè)與“更”不同。“還”的預(yù)設(shè)是“沒(méi)想到Y(jié) W”。第三,二者的主觀性。宗守云(2011)認(rèn)為,“還”的主觀性高于“更”的主觀性。文全民(2008)則認(rèn)為只有“還”有主觀性。雖然漢語(yǔ)比較句中副詞“還”和“更”的研究有了一些具體的語(yǔ)義分析,但是還存在一些分歧。經(jīng)過(guò)討論本文認(rèn)為:第一,漢語(yǔ)比較結(jié)構(gòu)中的“還”可以視為量級(jí)算子;“更”具有比較詞素的功能。第二,本文通過(guò)預(yù)設(shè)測(cè)試證明了兩者具有相同的語(yǔ)義預(yù)設(shè)。第三,本文闡明了“還”與數(shù)量詞的兼容問(wèn)題,為日后研究“更”與數(shù)量詞的不兼容問(wèn)題奠定了理論基礎(chǔ)�！斑�”和“更”語(yǔ)義研究和二者的語(yǔ)義差異,使二者的不同分布可以得到解釋,也豐富了“還”和“更”在比較結(jié)構(gòu)中研究。
[Abstract]:Lu Jianming (1980) first mentioned the "Huanghen" and "Geng" research in "Huanhe" and "Gan". Lu Jianming mainly analyzes the similarities and differences between "Hui" and "Geng" from the sentence pattern "X than Y [] W". In his opinion, both can represent an increase in degree semantically. The difference is that "more" contains the meaning of progressive development, and "also" contains the meaning of change. Subsequently, the study of "Huai" and "Geng" in comparative sentences has become more and more abundant. The main focus is on three points: first, the semantics of the two. Both "also" and "more" in the comparative structure indicate an increase in degree. Second, the presupposition meaning of both. Yin Zhiping (1995), Shen Jiaxuan (2001), Lv Shuxiang (2005) thought that the presupposition of "Hui" and "Geng" in the comparative sentence was that the standard comparative item (Y) had a certain degree of W. Another view, Zong Shouyun (2011), believes that the presupposition of "return" is different from that of "Gan". The presupposition of "return" is "not expecting Y W". Third, the subjectivity of both. Zong Shouyun (2011) thinks that the subjectivity of "return" is higher than that of "more". The whole people (2008) thought that only "still" had subjectivity. Although there are some specific semantic analyses on adverbs "Huanghen" and "Gan" in Chinese comparative sentences, there are still some differences. First, the "return" in Chinese comparative structure can be regarded as an order of magnitude operator, and "more" has the function of comparing morpheme. Secondly, this paper proves that the two have the same semantic presupposition. Thirdly, this paper clarifies the compatibility between "return" and quantifiers, which lays a theoretical foundation for the future study of the incompatibility between "more" and quantifiers. The semantic study of "Huanghan" and "Gan" and their semantic differences can explain their different distributions and enrich the study of "Huanghen" and "Geng" in the comparative structure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H146.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宗守云;;“X比Y還W”的構(gòu)式意義及其與“X比Y更W”的差異[J];華文教學(xué)與研究;2011年04期

2 張誼生;;“更”字比較句中多項(xiàng)比較的程序與格式[J];世界漢語(yǔ)教學(xué);2009年04期

3 武果;;副詞“還”的主觀性用法[J];世界漢語(yǔ)教學(xué);2009年03期

4 夏群;;漢語(yǔ)比較句研究綜述[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2009年02期

5 于立昌;夏群;;比較句和比擬句試析[J];語(yǔ)言教學(xué)與研究;2008年01期

6 文全民;;“更”和“還”在肯定與否定比較句中的差異[J];世界漢語(yǔ)教學(xué);2008年01期

7 任瑚璉;“白”類副詞是具有特定預(yù)設(shè)的副詞[J];西南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年05期

8 段益民;略論語(yǔ)言單位的層級(jí)性預(yù)設(shè)[J];延安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

9 沈家煊;;跟副詞“還”有關(guān)的兩個(gè)句式[J];中國(guó)語(yǔ)文;2001年06期

10 沈家煊;語(yǔ)言的“主觀性”和“主觀化”[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;2001年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2117425