本文選題：中國(guó)英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者 + 同伴書(shū)面和口頭反饋　； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：同伴反饋在提高二語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作質(zhì)量,增強(qiáng)讀者意識(shí),促進(jìn)學(xué)生合作互動(dòng)等方面的優(yōu)勢(shì)已得到廣泛認(rèn)可。成功的實(shí)施同伴反饋,需要選擇恰當(dāng)?shù)耐榉答伔绞?如同伴書(shū)面和/或口頭反饋。盡管國(guó)內(nèi)外對(duì)同伴反饋的研究眾多,但同伴反饋的不同方式對(duì)寫(xiě)作的影響尚未得到足夠的關(guān)注。因此,本研究嘗試探討同伴書(shū)面和口頭反饋方式對(duì)中國(guó)英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作的影響,重點(diǎn)研究不同反饋方式下學(xué)生反饋側(cè)重點(diǎn)的差別,兩種反饋引發(fā)的注意對(duì)修改的作用,以及學(xué)生對(duì)同伴反饋方式的態(tài)度。二十位英語(yǔ)專業(yè)的學(xué)生各完成了兩篇托福作文,分別采用書(shū)面和口頭反饋的方式互評(píng),之后對(duì)自己的作文進(jìn)行修改,并在問(wèn)卷和訪談中分享有關(guān)同伴反饋的經(jīng)歷及看法。通過(guò)分析文本、口頭反饋錄音、問(wèn)卷及訪談等,研究發(fā)現(xiàn)兩種同伴反饋方式都對(duì)受試者的英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作產(chǎn)生了積極影響。在反饋側(cè)重點(diǎn)方面,兩種反饋方式下的反饋都集中在語(yǔ)法和內(nèi)容方面,詞匯、技巧和結(jié)構(gòu)方面的反饋較少;兩種反饋方式下受試者給出的反饋絕大多數(shù)為負(fù)面反饋,書(shū)面反饋方式下負(fù)面反饋比例更高;此外,兩種反饋方式的準(zhǔn)確度都較高,其中口頭反饋的準(zhǔn)確率更高。在注意引發(fā)的修改方面,受試者對(duì)書(shū)面反饋的接受率更高,但由口頭反饋引發(fā)的修改比例更高,兩者引發(fā)的修改都有較高正確率,且使受試者文章的整體分?jǐn)?shù)和語(yǔ)法、內(nèi)容、詞匯等方面的分?jǐn)?shù)有所提高。學(xué)生對(duì)同伴反饋的態(tài)度方面,受試者認(rèn)可同伴反饋和口頭反饋的作用;大多數(shù)受試者以前只有書(shū)面同伴反饋的經(jīng)歷,希望能同時(shí)得到同伴書(shū)面和口頭反饋;受試者普遍表現(xiàn)出對(duì)自己英語(yǔ)水平和寫(xiě)作水平信心不足�；谝陨习l(fā)現(xiàn),本研究認(rèn)為同伴書(shū)面和口頭反饋對(duì)中國(guó)英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作有積極影響,且學(xué)生對(duì)此持積極態(tài)度,因此,應(yīng)在教學(xué)中靈活使用這兩種反饋方式。再者,為有效實(shí)施同伴反饋,英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教師應(yīng)當(dāng)進(jìn)行充分的準(zhǔn)備,對(duì)學(xué)生進(jìn)行足夠的培訓(xùn),使學(xué)生給出的反饋更加全面準(zhǔn)確。最后,在實(shí)施同伴互評(píng)時(shí),應(yīng)充分發(fā)揮好引導(dǎo)和監(jiān)督作用,通過(guò)恰當(dāng)?shù)墓膭?lì)和積極反饋,增強(qiáng)學(xué)生的自信心。
[Abstract]:Peer feedback has been widely recognized for its advantages in improving the quality of L2 writing, enhancing readers' awareness and promoting students' cooperative interaction. Successful implementation of peer feedback requires the selection of appropriate peer feedback methods, such as peer written and / or oral feedback. Although there are many researches on peer feedback at home and abroad, the influence of different ways of peer feedback on writing has not been paid enough attention. Therefore, the present study attempts to explore the effects of peer written and oral feedback on Chinese EFL learners' English writing, focusing on the differences in the emphasis of students' feedback under different feedback modes, and the effect of the attention caused by the two types of feedback on the revision. And the students' attitude towards peer feedback. Twenty English majors each completed two TOEFL compositions, which were evaluated by written and oral feedback, and then their compositions were revised, and their experiences and opinions about peer feedback were shared in questionnaires and interviews. By analyzing the texts, oral feedback recordings, questionnaires and interviews, it is found that both peer feedback methods have a positive effect on the subjects' English writing. In terms of feedback focus, the feedback in both ways is mainly in grammar and content, but there is less feedback in vocabulary, technique and structure, and the feedback given by the subjects is mostly negative feedback. In addition, the accuracy of the two feedback methods is higher, and the accuracy of oral feedback is higher. In the aspect of attention to the revision, the acceptance rate of written feedback was higher, but the proportion of revision caused by oral feedback was higher. Both of them had higher correct rate, and the overall score, grammar and content of the article were also improved. Scores on vocabulary have improved. In terms of students' attitude towards peer feedback, the subjects recognized the role of peer feedback and oral feedback; most of the subjects had only written peer feedback experience before, hoping to get both written and oral peer feedback. The subjects generally showed a lack of confidence in their English and writing skills. Based on the above findings, the present study suggests that peer written and oral feedback has a positive effect on Chinese EFL learners' English writing, and students have a positive attitude towards it. Therefore, we should use these two feedback methods flexibly in teaching. Furthermore, in order to effectively implement peer feedback, English writing teachers should make adequate preparations and provide adequate training to students so that the feedback from students can be more comprehensive and accurate. Finally, in the implementation of peer evaluation, we should give full play to the role of guidance and supervision, through appropriate encouragement and positive feedback to enhance students' self-confidence.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H319.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金曉宏;;非英語(yǔ)專業(yè)大學(xué)生對(duì)不同形式英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作評(píng)改反饋的接受程度研究[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2016年05期

2 文秋芳;;“師生合作評(píng)價(jià)”:“產(chǎn)出導(dǎo)向法”創(chuàng)設(shè)的新評(píng)價(jià)形式[J];外語(yǔ)界;2016年05期

3 張麗敏;于書(shū)林;;探究教師書(shū)面反饋的言語(yǔ)功能:靜態(tài)文本還是動(dòng)態(tài)話語(yǔ)?[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2015年02期

4 董家麗;曲衛(wèi)國(guó);;英文寫(xiě)作元認(rèn)知與同伴互評(píng)書(shū)面評(píng)語(yǔ)的關(guān)聯(lián)性研究[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2015年02期

5 劉永厚;;英語(yǔ)專業(yè)寫(xiě)作小組同伴反饋和教師反饋效果研究[J];外語(yǔ)界;2015年01期

6 孫鑫;李秋菊;;基礎(chǔ)英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作教學(xué)中自我、同伴及教師評(píng)估對(duì)比研究[J];中國(guó)外語(yǔ);2015年01期

7 邢加新;代尊峰;;《第二語(yǔ)言習(xí)得與寫(xiě)作中的書(shū)面修正性反饋》介評(píng)[J];現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ);2014年01期

8 王穎;;維果茨基最近發(fā)展區(qū)理論及其應(yīng)用研究[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年12期

9 周一書(shū);;大學(xué)英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作反饋方式的對(duì)比研究[J];外語(yǔ)界;2013年03期

10 周一書(shū);;論同伴反饋在大學(xué)英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作課堂中的有效性[J];江蘇教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué));2013年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王宇紅;反饋、注意與二語(yǔ)發(fā)展[D];上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2019422