本文選題：線性等值 + 心理咨詢師�。� 參考：《魯東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：測驗(yàn)等值,作為心理測量中的一個(gè)重要領(lǐng)域,其主要目的是使不同測驗(yàn)版本的分?jǐn)?shù)之間具有可比性,為考試的公平性提供保障。此項(xiàng)研究以經(jīng)典測驗(yàn)理論為等值模型,對2015年11月份和2015年5月份心理咨詢師(三級)職業(yè)資格考試的試卷進(jìn)行了等值分析,為國內(nèi)相關(guān)的資格考試的等值研究與應(yīng)用提供了理論與實(shí)踐的參考價(jià)值。此項(xiàng)研究的等值方法選用錨測驗(yàn)非等組設(shè)計(jì),以經(jīng)典測驗(yàn)理論為等值理論模型,探究了錨測驗(yàn)非等組設(shè)計(jì)中的Tucker觀察分?jǐn)?shù)的方法、Levine觀察分?jǐn)?shù)的方法與Levine真分?jǐn)?shù)的方法,對這三種線性等值方法做出了比較研究。通過比較這三種方法在不同總體權(quán)重下的等值誤差的大小,選出等值誤差最小的一個(gè)作為心理咨詢師(三級)職業(yè)資格考試的等值方法。將最適合心理咨詢師(三級)職業(yè)資格考試的等值方法的轉(zhuǎn)換方程應(yīng)用于兩次測驗(yàn)成績的等值中,經(jīng)過嚴(yán)密的統(tǒng)計(jì)和分析得出2015年11月份與2015年5月份心理咨詢師(三級)職業(yè)資格考試的等值轉(zhuǎn)換分?jǐn)?shù)對照表。研究結(jié)果表明選用的錨測驗(yàn)與2015年11月份和2015年5月份兩次測驗(yàn)的相關(guān)系數(shù)分別為:0.888和0.855,錨測驗(yàn)與兩份測驗(yàn)之間有顯著的相關(guān)。在線性等值法中,當(dāng)總體權(quán)重為1時(shí),Tucker觀察分?jǐn)?shù)法的截距為-4.673,斜率為0.966;Levine觀察分?jǐn)?shù)法的截距為-5.850,斜率為0.961。當(dāng)總體權(quán)重為0.501時(shí),Tucker觀察分?jǐn)?shù)法的截距為-4.692,斜率為0.965;Levine觀察分?jǐn)?shù)法的截距為-5.930,斜率為0.963;Levine真分?jǐn)?shù)法的截距為-7.153,斜率為0.985。選用加權(quán)誤差均方差作為等值誤差大小的指標(biāo),得出當(dāng)總體權(quán)重為1時(shí),Tucker觀察分?jǐn)?shù)法等值誤差最小為1.6008;當(dāng)總體權(quán)重為1時(shí),Levine觀察分?jǐn)?shù)法等值誤差最大為2.0687。據(jù)此可知,當(dāng)總體權(quán)重為1時(shí),Tucker觀察分?jǐn)?shù)法最適合作為心理咨詢師(三級)職業(yè)資格考試的等值方法。根據(jù)總體權(quán)重為1時(shí),Tucker觀察分?jǐn)?shù)法的等值方程y=0.966x-4.674,可以將2015年11月份心理咨詢師(三級)職業(yè)資格考試?yán)碚摬糠峙c2015年5月份心理咨詢師(三級)職業(yè)資格考試?yán)碚摬糠诌M(jìn)行兩個(gè)測驗(yàn)版本之間分?jǐn)?shù)的等值轉(zhuǎn)換,實(shí)現(xiàn)兩份測驗(yàn)的等值。通過等值數(shù)據(jù)的分析,得到如下結(jié)論:1、在心理咨詢師職業(yè)資格考試的等值實(shí)踐中選用錨測驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)是比較科學(xué)的。2、在心理咨詢師這類的職業(yè)資格考試中宜選用Tucker法來實(shí)現(xiàn)測驗(yàn)版本之間的等值。3、不同總體權(quán)重的選擇,對實(shí)現(xiàn)心理咨詢師職業(yè)資格考試的等值結(jié)果的影響甚微。
[Abstract]:As an important field of psychological measurement, the main purpose of test equivalence is to make the scores of different test versions comparable and to guarantee the fairness of the test. Using classical test theory as the equivalent model, this study analyzed the equivalence of the test papers of psychological counselors (level 3) vocational qualification examination in November 2015 and May 2015, respectively. It provides theoretical and practical reference value for the research and application of relevant qualification examination in China. The equivalence method of this study is based on the non-equal group design of anchor test. Based on the classical test theory as the equivalent theoretical model, the method of Tucker observation score and the method of Levine true score in the design of anchor test non-equal group are explored. The three linear equivalence methods are compared and studied. By comparing the magnitude of the equivalent errors of the three methods under different total weights, the one with the smallest equivalent error is selected as the equivalent method of the professional qualification examination of the counselors (level 3). The conversion equation of the equivalent method most suitable for the professional qualification examination of the counsellor (level 3) was applied to the equivalence of the results of the two tests. Through strict statistics and analysis, a comparison table of equivalent conversion scores between November 2015 and May 2015 was obtained. The results show that the correlation coefficients between the anchor test and the two tests in November 2015 and May 2015 are respectively 0: 0.888 and 0.855, and there is a significant correlation between the anchor test and the two tests. In the linear equivalent method, when the total weight is 1, the intercept of Tucker observation fraction method is -4.673, the slope is -5.850 and the slope is 0.961. When the total weight is 0.501, the intercept of Tucker observation fraction method is -4.692, the slope is -5.930, the slope is -7.153 and the slope is 0.985.The total weight of Tucker observation fraction method is -4.692, the slope is -5.930. The weighted error mean square error is chosen as the index of equivalent error, and the minimum equivalent error of Tucker observation fraction method is 1.6008 when the total weight is 1, and the maximum equivalent error of Levine observation fraction method is 2.0687 when the total weight is 1. Therefore, when the total weight is 1, the Tucker observation score method is the most suitable for the equivalent method of the professional qualification examination for psychological counsellors (level 3). According to the equivalent equation of the Tucker observation score method with a total weight of 1, 0.966x-4.674, the theoretical part of the professional qualification examination for psychological counselors (level 3) in November 2015 and the theory for the vocational qualification examination for psychological counselors (level 3) in May 2015 can be regarded as the theory of the vocational qualification examination for psychological counselors (level 3) in May 2015. Part of the equivalent conversion of scores between the two test versions, Achieve the equivalent of two tests. Through the analysis of equivalent data, The conclusion is as follows: 1, it is more scientific to choose anchor test design in the equivalent practice of the psychological counsellors' vocational qualification examination, and the Tucker method should be used in the psychological counsellors' professional qualification examination to realize the difference between the test versions. Equal value. 3, selection of different overall weights, It has little influence on the achievement of the equivalent result of the psychological counsellors' professional qualification examination.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：魯東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B841

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金永紅;;心理咨詢師未經(jīng)培訓(xùn)不準(zhǔn)上崗[J];福建勞動(dòng)和社會(huì)保障;2002年04期

2 李從尼;高輝;;心理咨詢師——頗有發(fā)展?jié)摿Φ男屡d職業(yè)[J];教育與職業(yè);2003年14期

3 石玉華;心理咨詢師手記:緩解壓力有方法[J];成才與就業(yè);2005年Z2期

4 王素華,李荔;淺談心理咨詢師的價(jià)值觀對心理咨詢的影響[J];桂林師范高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2005年01期

5 王筱鵬;;一名心理咨詢師的心理路程[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(高等教育版);2006年S2期

6 ;北京:接待信訪可聘心理咨詢師[J];上海人大月刊;2006年11期

7 李強(qiáng);許丹;;心理咨詢師從業(yè)初始動(dòng)機(jī)個(gè)案研究[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2007年02期

8 陶R押，

本文編號：1948748