本文選題：口語發(fā)展 + 復(fù)雜度��； 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：口語能力是二語能力的重要組成部分,也是近年來二語研究的一個熱門論題,因此研究者們對口語流利度和準(zhǔn)確性進(jìn)行了大量研究。然而,與口語流利度和準(zhǔn)確性相比,口語復(fù)雜度的關(guān)注卻相對不多。研究者調(diào)查了影響英語口語能力的因素及如何提高英語口語能力,但相關(guān)研究較少涉及口語復(fù)雜度的發(fā)展問題,其中關(guān)于不同水平學(xué)生口語復(fù)雜度發(fā)展模式的研究則更少。為此,本研究采用量化研究與基于具體條目分析相結(jié)合的方法,對英語專業(yè)大學(xué)生及不同水平英語專業(yè)學(xué)生英語口語復(fù)雜度的發(fā)展趨勢做出全面的分析,試圖探索英語專業(yè)學(xué)生口語復(fù)雜度的發(fā)展軌跡,并分析不同水平學(xué)生口語復(fù)雜度的發(fā)展軌跡是否相似。本研究被試來自于上海某高校的一個自然班英語專業(yè)學(xué)生,共19人。通過對他們大學(xué)四年期間的四次口語測試進(jìn)行語料收集;并對四次測試的語料進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)寫;根據(jù)其專業(yè)四級測試水平將其分成高、中、低水平學(xué)習(xí)者,分析其口語復(fù)雜度四年期間發(fā)展變化情況。本研究中,口語復(fù)雜度的量化研究包括對句法復(fù)雜度和詞匯復(fù)雜度的分析。句法復(fù)雜度的測量指標(biāo)為每個C單位中的平均從句個數(shù),C單位中從句的平均長度以及C單位的平均長度。詞匯復(fù)雜度的測量指標(biāo)為詞匯多樣性,詞匯密度以及詞匯豐富度;該部分使用了 Antword軟件進(jìn)行協(xié)助分析。量化研究主要運(yùn)用SPSS重復(fù)測量工具來判定各指標(biāo)四年期間是否具有顯著性差異�？谡Z復(fù)雜度的基于具體條目分析包括根據(jù)Ravid的名詞級別進(jìn)行名詞研究,尤其是抽象名詞研究,以及根據(jù)Pienemann的可加工理論進(jìn)行形態(tài)句法研究。基于以上研究指標(biāo)的分析,主要有以下發(fā)現(xiàn):1.學(xué)生總體口語復(fù)雜度情況分析結(jié)果顯示,經(jīng)過四年的大學(xué)學(xué)習(xí),英語專業(yè)學(xué)生的口語復(fù)雜度呈現(xiàn)上升趨勢。其中,句法復(fù)雜度中從句個數(shù)及從句長度發(fā)展緩慢,而C單位長度在第四年發(fā)展顯著;詞匯復(fù)雜度中的詞匯多樣性及詞匯復(fù)雜度逐年發(fā)展,而詞匯密度四年期間變化不顯著;名詞中第五類通用名詞使用最為頻繁,抽象名詞中第九類抽象名詞使用最多;形態(tài)句法逐年發(fā)展,且低級階段發(fā)展快于高級階段。2.不同水平學(xué)生口語復(fù)雜度情況分析結(jié)果顯示,經(jīng)過四年的大學(xué)學(xué)習(xí),不同水平英語專業(yè)學(xué)生的口語復(fù)雜度發(fā)展呈現(xiàn)不同的發(fā)展態(tài)勢。就產(chǎn)出的C單位長度,詞匯多樣性,詞匯豐富性,抽象名詞的使用以及句法形態(tài)第四五階段等指標(biāo)而言,高水平學(xué)生的口語復(fù)雜度發(fā)展優(yōu)于低水平學(xué)生。然而,就使用的從句數(shù)量、從句長度以及形態(tài)句法第三階段而言,低水平的學(xué)生發(fā)展快于高水平學(xué)生。
[Abstract]:Oral proficiency is an important part of L2 competence, and it is also a hot topic in L2 research in recent years. Therefore, many researchers have done a lot of research on oral fluency and accuracy. However, compared with oral fluency and accuracy, oral complexity is less concerned. The researchers investigated the factors that affect oral English proficiency and how to improve oral English proficiency. However, the development of oral complexity is seldom involved in the related studies, especially in the development patterns of oral complexity of students at different levels. Therefore, this study adopts the method of quantitative research and item-based analysis to make a comprehensive analysis of the development trend of oral English complexity of English majors and English majors of different levels. This paper attempts to explore the development track of oral complexity of English majors and analyze whether the development trajectory of oral complexity of English majors is similar or not. The subjects of this study were 19 English majors from a natural class in a university in Shanghai. By collecting the data from four oral tests during their four-year college years, and transferring the data from the four tests, they were divided into high, middle and low level learners according to their level of CET4. This paper analyzes the development and changes of its oral complexity over a period of four years. In this study, the quantitative study of oral complexity includes the analysis of syntactic complexity and lexical complexity. The measure of syntactic complexity is the average number of clauses in each C unit and the average length of clauses in C unit and the average length of C unit. Lexical complexity is measured by lexical diversity, lexical density and lexical richness, which is analyzed with Antword software. The quantitative research mainly uses the SPSS repeated measurement tool to determine whether there are significant differences in the four years of each index. The analysis of colloquial complexity based on specific items includes the study of nouns according to the noun level of Ravid, especially the study of abstract nouns, and the study of morphology and syntax according to Pienemann's machinability theory. Based on the above analysis, the main findings are as follows: 1. The results show that after four years of college study, the oral complexity of English majors is on the rise. Among them, the number of clauses and the length of clauses in syntactic complexity develop slowly, while the length of C unit develops significantly in the fourth year, the variety of vocabulary and the complexity of vocabulary in lexical complexity develop year by year, but the change of lexical density is not significant during four years. The fifth category of general nouns is used most frequently, and the ninth category of abstract nouns is the most frequently used. The morphological syntax develops year by year, and the lower stage develops faster than the advanced stage. 2. The results show that after four years of college study, the oral complexity of English majors of different levels presents different development trends. In terms of C-unit length, lexical diversity, lexical richness, the use of abstract nouns and the fourth stage of syntactic morphology, the development of oral complexity of high-level students is better than that of lower-level students. However, in terms of the number of clauses used, the length of clauses and the third stage of morphology and syntax, the low level students develop faster than the high level students.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H319.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 關(guān)晶;石運(yùn)章;;動態(tài)系統(tǒng)理論視角下非英語專業(yè)學(xué)生英語課堂焦慮實(shí)證研究[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年05期

2 鄭詠滟;;基于動態(tài)系統(tǒng)理論的自由產(chǎn)出詞匯歷時發(fā)展研究[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2015年02期

3 戴運(yùn)財;王同順;;基于動態(tài)系統(tǒng)理論的二語習(xí)得模式研究——環(huán)境、學(xué)習(xí)者與語言的互動[J];山東外語教學(xué);2012年05期

4 鄭詠滟;;動態(tài)系統(tǒng)理論在二語習(xí)得研究中的應(yīng)用——以二語詞匯發(fā)展研究為例[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2011年03期

5 李蘭霞;;動態(tài)系統(tǒng)理論與第二語言發(fā)展[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2011年03期

6 王淼;;基于動態(tài)系統(tǒng)理論的網(wǎng)絡(luò)英語閱讀模式[J];外語界;2011年02期

7 王濤;;從二語習(xí)得到二語發(fā)展:一個動態(tài)的觀點(diǎn)[J];外語教學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2010年04期

8 張宏武;;復(fù)雜理論視野下的動態(tài)語法觀[J];嘉應(yīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年07期

9 萬麗芳;;中國英語專業(yè)大學(xué)生二語寫作中的詞匯豐富性研究[J];外語界;2010年01期

10 李瑤;沈金華;;非英語專業(yè)低年級大學(xué)生產(chǎn)出性詞匯研究[J];外語學(xué)刊;2009年03期

，

本文編號：1914334