本文選題：社交焦慮 + 面部表情��； 參考：《浙江理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：社交焦慮個(gè)體會(huì)優(yōu)先加工威脅相關(guān)的信息,對(duì)威脅性刺激存在注意偏差。本研究使用點(diǎn)探測(cè)范式考察了非臨床社交焦慮個(gè)體對(duì)不同注視方向快樂(lè)和輕蔑表情的初始注意偏差,并使用眼動(dòng)技術(shù),通過(guò)分析眼動(dòng)特征探究了后期的注意偏差特點(diǎn)。本研究由三個(gè)研究組成,共包括五個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)。研究一使用點(diǎn)探測(cè)范式,探究在注意加工過(guò)程的初始階段,非臨床社交焦慮個(gè)體對(duì)輕蔑表情的注意偏差,包括實(shí)驗(yàn)一和實(shí)驗(yàn)二。實(shí)驗(yàn)一考察直視的輕蔑表情,實(shí)驗(yàn)二考察斜視的輕蔑表情。在實(shí)驗(yàn)一中,還將初步考察性別差異。研究二探究非臨床社交焦慮個(gè)體對(duì)快樂(lè)表情的初始注意偏差,包括實(shí)驗(yàn)三和實(shí)驗(yàn)四,分別考察直視的快樂(lè)表情和斜視的快樂(lè)表情。研究三由實(shí)驗(yàn)五組成,使用眼動(dòng)技術(shù),通過(guò)分析非臨床社交焦慮個(gè)體瀏覽不同注視方向快樂(lè)和輕蔑表情的注視點(diǎn)個(gè)數(shù)及注視時(shí)間,考察其在注意加工后期的注意偏差特點(diǎn)。由實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果得出了以下結(jié)論:1)在注意加工過(guò)程初期,相比于中性表情,非臨床的社交焦慮個(gè)體更優(yōu)先加工直視的輕蔑表情,即存在負(fù)性注意偏向。2)在注意加工過(guò)程初期,對(duì)直視輕蔑表情的負(fù)性注意偏向僅出現(xiàn)在高社交焦慮水平的女性被試中,男性被試無(wú)此表現(xiàn),即負(fù)性注意偏向存在性別差異。3)在注意加工過(guò)程初期,輕蔑表情只有當(dāng)與直視結(jié)合時(shí),高社交焦慮個(gè)體才會(huì)表現(xiàn)出注意偏向,斜視的輕蔑表情不會(huì)引起注意偏差。4)在注意加工過(guò)程初期,相比于中性表情,低社交焦慮個(gè)體更優(yōu)先加工快樂(lè)表情,存在正性注意偏向,但高社交焦慮個(gè)體對(duì)積極刺激存在加工缺陷,無(wú)此表現(xiàn)。5)在注意加工過(guò)程后期,相比于低社交焦慮個(gè)體,高社交焦慮個(gè)體對(duì)面孔的眼睛區(qū)域存在普遍的回避現(xiàn)象,表現(xiàn)為相對(duì)注視次數(shù)較少,相對(duì)注視時(shí)間較短,并且這種回避現(xiàn)象主要表現(xiàn)在對(duì)輕蔑直視、輕蔑斜視和快樂(lè)斜視表情的注視上。6)在注意加工過(guò)程后期,相比于快樂(lè)表情,高社交焦慮個(gè)體更避免注視輕蔑表情的眼睛區(qū)域。本研究考察了在注意加工過(guò)程的不同階段,非臨床社交焦慮個(gè)體對(duì)不同注視方向面部表情的注意偏差。一方面,這將對(duì)社交焦慮的原因探索、以及臨床診斷等有潛在意義;另一方面,將有助于提高以此為基礎(chǔ)的注意訓(xùn)練程序的有效性。
[Abstract]:This study uses point detection paradigm to investigate the initial attention deviation of non clinical social anxiety individuals on happy and disdainful expressions in different gaze directions, and uses eye movement techniques to explore the later attention deviation by using eye movement and analyzing eye movements. This study consists of three studies, including five experiments. A use of a point detection paradigm to explore the initial stage of the attention processing process, the attention deviation of non clinical social anxiety individuals on disdainful expressions, including experiment one and experiment two. Experiment one inspects the light contempt expression of direct vision, and experiment two examines the disdainful expression of strabismus. In the first experiment, a preliminary study of gender differences. Study two explored the initial attention deviation of non clinical social anxiety individuals on happy expressions, including experiment three and Experiment four, which examined the happy expression of direct vision and the happy expression of strabismus. Study three was made up of experiment five, using eye movement technology to analyze non clinical social anxiety individuals. Look at the number of gaze points and gaze time of the happy and disdain expressions in different gaze directions, and examine the characteristics of attention deviation in the later period of attention. The following conclusions are drawn from the experimental results: 1) in the early stages of attention to the process of processing, the non clinical social anxiety body is more preferred to process the disdainful expression of direct vision, that is, the negative sex is negative. Attention bias to.2) at the beginning of the process of attention to the process of processing, the negative attention bias toward the direct contempt expression is only in the high social anxiety level of female subjects, the male subjects have no performance, that is, negative attention biased towards the existence of gender difference.3) in the early stage of attention processing, the disdainful expression only when combined with direct vision, the high social anxiety individual only Showing attention bias, the disdainful expression of strabismus does not cause attention bias.4) in the early stages of attention processing, compared to neutral expressions, low social anxiety individuals have preferred to process happy expressions and have positive attention bias, but high social anxiety individuals have additive defects on active stimulation, and no.5) in the later period of attention to the process of processing. Compared to the low social anxiety individuals, there is a general avoidance phenomenon in the eye area of the high social anxiety individuals, which shows that the number of relative fixations is less and the relative fixation time is shorter, and this avoidance phenomenon is mainly manifested in the.6 of contempt, disdainful strabismus and happy strabismus, in the later period of attention processing. On happy expressions, individuals with high social anxiety avoid looking at the eye areas of disdainful expression. This study examines the attention deviations of non clinical social anxiety individuals on facial expressions in different gaze directions at different stages of attention processing. On the one hand, it will be of potential significance for the exploration of social anxiety, and the clinical diagnosis. On the one hand, it will help to improve the effectiveness of the training program based on this.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B842.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姚泥沙;李松蔚;錢銘怡;余紅玉;林沐雨;王小玲;楊鵬;;高社交焦慮個(gè)體對(duì)正性面孔的情緒啟動(dòng)效應(yīng)[J];心理科學(xué);2013年05期

2 劉宏艷;胡治國(guó);;社交焦慮者的面部表情加工[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2013年11期

3 姚泥沙;李松蔚;錢銘怡;余紅玉;王小玲;林沐雨;趙欣;;社交焦慮個(gè)體對(duì)正性面孔刺激的解釋偏差[J];心理科學(xué);2012年06期

4 王振;苑成梅;黃佳;李則摯;陳玨;張海音;方貽儒;肖澤萍;;貝克抑郁量表第2版中文版在抑郁癥患者中的信效度[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2011年06期

5 楊智輝;王建平;;廣泛性焦慮個(gè)體的注意偏向[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

6 甘淑珍;李國(guó)瑞;;非臨床社交焦慮個(gè)體的注意偏向特征——以詞語(yǔ)和面孔表情為刺激材料的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];心理科學(xué);2010年03期

7 柳春香;黃希庭;;特質(zhì)焦慮大學(xué)生注意偏向的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];心理科學(xué);2008年06期

8 戴琴;馮正直;;抑郁患者的注意偏向[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2008年02期

9 陳曦,鐘杰,錢銘怡;社交焦慮個(gè)體的注意偏差實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[J];中國(guó)心理衛(wèi)生雜志;2004年12期

10 何燕玲,張明園;Liebowitz社交焦慮量表的信度和效度研究[J];診斷學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2004年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1913603