本文選題：韓國(guó) + 民族主義��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本論文主要以20世紀(jì)20至40年代末,以中國(guó)現(xiàn)代文學(xué)中的韓國(guó)題材創(chuàng)作為研究對(duì)象,以民族主義為研究視點(diǎn),以史學(xué)、民族學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)等學(xué)科的理論為依托,適當(dāng)?shù)剡\(yùn)用比較文學(xué)形象學(xué)和社會(huì)歷史批評(píng)的研究方法,從民族主義正反兩個(gè)方面,試圖打破不同文學(xué)派別的理論主張、創(chuàng)作風(fēng)格的差異和時(shí)間的跨度,以整體性的視野,來分析相關(guān)作品所呈現(xiàn)的對(duì)韓國(guó)民族主義的書寫。對(duì)韓國(guó)民族主義的書寫主要體現(xiàn)在以下三個(gè)方面:通過塑造韓民族民族主義象征物和展現(xiàn)流亡韓國(guó)人的語言使用、所處空間等生存狀況,來表現(xiàn)其領(lǐng)土訴求;通過塑造苦難而偉大的韓民族形象、能夠代表韓民族精神的韓國(guó)革命者形象和描寫韓國(guó)人的身份困境與分化,來表現(xiàn)流亡韓國(guó)人渴望建立獨(dú)立自主的現(xiàn)代民族國(guó)家的政治民族主義訴求;同時(shí)中國(guó)現(xiàn)代作家也呈現(xiàn)了中韓民族間所存在的狹隘的民族情緒和盲目、自大的民族心態(tài)。作家們視韓民族的原型形態(tài)為政治共同體,將韓民族視為新國(guó)家構(gòu)成的主體來進(jìn)行書寫。這不僅表現(xiàn)了中國(guó)現(xiàn)代作家對(duì)亡國(guó)后韓民族命運(yùn)的關(guān)注,而且表現(xiàn)了他們以文學(xué)的方式,承擔(dān)起了剝離韓民族與中華民族間的依附關(guān)系和國(guó)家間的宗藩關(guān)系、聲援韓民族的民族主義運(yùn)動(dòng)、承認(rèn)韓國(guó)是獨(dú)立的民族國(guó)家的任務(wù)。這也正體現(xiàn)著中國(guó)現(xiàn)代文學(xué)對(duì)歌德曾倡導(dǎo)的世界文學(xué)的貢獻(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:This thesis mainly takes the Korean theme creation in modern Chinese literature as the research object, the nationalism as the research point of view, and the theories of history, ethnology, sociology and so on, from the end of the 20th century to the late 1940s. With the proper use of the research methods of comparative literature imageology and social and historical criticism, this paper tries to break the theoretical claims of different literary schools, the differences of creation styles and the span of time, from the positive and negative aspects of nationalism, in order to have a holistic view. To analyze the writing of Korean nationalism presented by relevant works. The writing of Korean nationalism is mainly embodied in the following three aspects: to express its territorial claims by shaping the symbols of Korean nationalism and showing the living conditions of the Korean exiled people such as their language use and the space in which they live; By shaping the great Korean national image of suffering, the Korean revolutionaries who can represent the Korean national spirit and describe the plight and differentiation of the Korean identity, At the same time, the modern Chinese writers also show the narrow national mood and blind, arrogant national mentality between the Chinese and Korean nationalities. The writers regard the archetypal form of the Korean nation as a political community and regard the Korean nation as the subject of the new state. This not only shows the modern Chinese writers' concern about the fate of the Korean nation after the national subjugation, but also shows that they, in a literary way, have assumed the attachment relationship between the Korean nation and the Chinese nation and the suzerain-vassal relationship between the countries. The nationalist movement in solidarity with the Korean nation recognizes South Korea as the task of an independent nation-state. This also reflects the contribution of Chinese modern literature to the world literature advocated by Goethe.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：I206.6
，

本文編號(hào)：1892624