本文選題：話輪轉(zhuǎn)換 + 政治采訪　； 參考：《沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：對(duì)于我們的生活來(lái)說(shuō),語(yǔ)言是一個(gè)必不可少的工具,因此話語(yǔ)成為了人類語(yǔ)言交流系統(tǒng)的基礎(chǔ)部分。并且作為日常話語(yǔ)的重要組成部分---話輪轉(zhuǎn)換---有它自己的規(guī)律性�，F(xiàn)在越來(lái)越多的研究者開(kāi)始研究它,他們發(fā)現(xiàn)不同體裁(日常會(huì)話,半機(jī)構(gòu)性話語(yǔ),機(jī)構(gòu)性話語(yǔ))的話輪轉(zhuǎn)換有著不同的特點(diǎn)。眾所周知,作為一個(gè)特殊的電視節(jié)目,政治采訪涉及到許多敏感的政治問(wèn)題,但也是由于這個(gè)因素,相關(guān)的政治采訪節(jié)目也有很高的收視率。因此在此類節(jié)目里,被采訪者如何選擇詞語(yǔ)回答問(wèn)題和陳述自己的觀點(diǎn)以贏得大眾的支持是我們要關(guān)注的,采訪者如何問(wèn)話和鼓勵(lì)被采訪者去回答以便取得更多的信息也是值得我們推敲的。本篇論文應(yīng)用語(yǔ)用學(xué)的社會(huì)認(rèn)知分析法去分析電視政治采訪的話輪轉(zhuǎn)換。y語(yǔ)用學(xué)的社會(huì)認(rèn)知分析法,已經(jīng)成為語(yǔ)用學(xué)領(lǐng)域的一個(gè)新趨向,它結(jié)合了社會(huì)和認(rèn)知兩個(gè)因素去分析日常會(huì)話的現(xiàn)象。這篇文章的目的是找出在語(yǔ)用學(xué)社會(huì)認(rèn)知分析法下電視政治采訪中話輪轉(zhuǎn)換的特點(diǎn)。根據(jù)這個(gè)目的,這篇論文提出了三個(gè)研究問(wèn)題:(1)根據(jù)語(yǔ)用學(xué)的社會(huì)認(rèn)知分析法電視政治采訪的話輪分配有何特點(diǎn)?(2)根據(jù)語(yǔ)用學(xué)的社會(huì)認(rèn)知分析法電視政治采訪的話輪構(gòu)建有何特點(diǎn)?(3)根據(jù)語(yǔ)用學(xué)社會(huì)認(rèn)知分析法電視政治采訪中交際者采用的輪轉(zhuǎn)換策略有什么特點(diǎn)?本篇論文采用定量和定性分析法,分析5篇CNN的采訪的轉(zhuǎn)寫(xiě)。通過(guò)分析發(fā)現(xiàn)當(dāng)交構(gòu)者在構(gòu)建話輪時(shí),首先他們是合作的,同時(shí)他們會(huì)考慮公眾和自己的利益,利用先關(guān)信息和凸顯信息達(dá)成自己的交際目的。并且大部分被采訪者會(huì)使用句群去回答或陳述他們的觀點(diǎn),以便使自己的觀點(diǎn)表述的更清晰;采訪者會(huì)使用簡(jiǎn)單句子(通常來(lái)說(shuō)是問(wèn)題)去構(gòu)建話輪以便節(jié)省時(shí)間。當(dāng)他們分配話輪時(shí),交際者通常會(huì)遵循話輪轉(zhuǎn)換規(guī)則,但是如果需要采訪者會(huì)打斷話輪。采訪者通常用問(wèn)句來(lái)放棄話輪,用打斷的方式來(lái)獲取話輪;而被采訪者通常會(huì)保持話輪以便更清楚陳述他/她的觀點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:Language is an indispensable tool in our life, so discourse has become the basic part of human language communication system. And as an important part of daily discourse-turn-shifting-has its own regularity. Now more and more researchers have begun to study it, they find that different genres (daily conversation, semi-institutional discourse, institutional discourse) have different characteristics. As we all know, as a special TV program, political interview involves many sensitive political issues, but also because of this factor, the relevant political interview programs also have a very high ratings. So in this kind of program, how the interviewees choose words to answer questions and state their views to win public support is what we need to pay attention to. How interviewers ask questions and encourage interviewees to answer for more information is also worth considering. This thesis applies the social cognitive analysis method of pragmatics to analyze the transformation of TV political interviews. The social cognitive analysis method of pragmatics has become a new trend in the field of pragmatics. It combines social and cognitive factors to analyze the phenomenon of daily conversation. The purpose of this paper is to find out the characteristics of the shift in TV political interviews under the social cognitive analysis of pragmatics. For this purpose, This paper raises three research questions: 1) according to the social cognitive analysis of pragmatics, what are the characteristics of the distribution of TV political interviews? 2) according to the social cognitive analysis of pragmatics, what are the characteristics of the construction of TV political interviews? According to the social cognitive analysis of pragmatics, what are the characteristics of the turn-over strategy adopted by communicators in TV political interviews? This paper uses quantitative and qualitative analysis to analyze the transposition of 5 CNN interviews. Through the analysis, it is found that when the communicators construct the turn, they are cooperative first, and at the same time, they will consider the public and their own interests, and make use of the information first and highlight the information to achieve their communicative purpose. And most interviewees use sentence groups to answer or state their views in order to make their views clearer, and interviewees use simple sentences (usually questions) to construct turns to save time. When they assign turns, communicators usually follow the turn-switching rules, but interviewers interrupt if needed. The interviewee usually gives up the round with questions and acquires it by interrupting, while the interviewee usually maintains the round to make his or her point clearer.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽(yáng)師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：H313

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 唐耀彩;;社會(huì)認(rèn)知語(yǔ)用學(xué)視角下的誤解研究[J];天津外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

2 姜望琪;;社會(huì)認(rèn)知語(yǔ)用學(xué)——Kecskes語(yǔ)用學(xué)理論評(píng)介[J];外文研究;2015年01期

3 王寅;;新認(rèn)知語(yǔ)用學(xué)——語(yǔ)言的認(rèn)知-社會(huì)研究取向[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2013年01期

4 周紅輝;冉永平;;社會(huì)-認(rèn)知語(yǔ)用新視角[J];外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2012年04期

5 陳新仁;;新認(rèn)知語(yǔ)用學(xué)——認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)視野中的認(rèn)知語(yǔ)用研究[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2011年02期

6 Istvan Kecskes;;Socio-cognitive Approach to Pragmatics[J];外國(guó)語(yǔ)(上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年05期

7 崔國(guó)鑫;;會(huì)話分析的語(yǔ)用研究[J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;2009年03期

8 吳t熮，

本文編號(hào)：1800644