本文選題：房玄齡　切入點(diǎn)：政治思想　出處：《長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：貞觀之治是中國(guó)封建社會(huì)著名的治世,房玄齡作為貞觀統(tǒng)治集團(tuán)的重要成員,與杜如晦一起創(chuàng)造了“房謀杜斷”的佳話。研究唐朝政治思想,必須研究貞觀之治;研究貞觀之治,必須研究房玄齡。思想決定實(shí)踐,研究房玄齡的政治思想中的儒家色彩,既有利于找到形成貞觀之治的思想原因,也有利于加深對(duì)儒家政治思想的理解和認(rèn)識(shí)。本文共分五章。第一章仔細(xì)梳理了房玄齡的生平事跡,以求對(duì)房玄齡本人有一個(gè)全面的了解。作者認(rèn)為,房玄齡人生經(jīng)歷大致以38歲投靠李世民為界,在此之前,房玄齡處于人生的潛伏期,思想逐漸成熟,擇主而事。在此之后,房玄齡輔佐李世民平息各路武裝力量,為唐朝政權(quán)的建立和穩(wěn)定做出了重要貢獻(xiàn)。第二章對(duì)房玄齡的老師、朋友和同事進(jìn)行思想梳理。物以類聚、人以群分,老師對(duì)學(xué)生、朋友之間思想影響是明顯的,能夠保持良好朋友、同事關(guān)系,往往在思想上也有一定的共鳴之處,通過揭示房玄齡師友思想的共同特點(diǎn),也能從側(cè)面分析出房玄齡的政治思想特征。第三章將房玄齡關(guān)于民本思想、吏治思想、人才思想、法治思想、民族和國(guó)防思想的表現(xiàn)與實(shí)踐進(jìn)行了梳理和分析,從政治實(shí)踐中去尋找儒家政治理念的烙印。房玄齡在政治實(shí)踐中反對(duì)窮兵黷武、愛惜民力、推行均田等政治實(shí)踐,具有“不讓一物失所”的民本思想。在吏治方面,房玄齡大刀闊斧進(jìn)行機(jī)構(gòu)改革,將全國(guó)州縣裁撤三分之一到二分之一,將文武官員精簡(jiǎn)到643員,同時(shí)強(qiáng)化官員工作考核,確保在精簡(jiǎn)官員隊(duì)伍的同時(shí)行政效率不會(huì)降低。在法治方面,房玄齡主張公平正直的法治思想,親自梳理隋代以來的法律制度,同時(shí)對(duì)苛法和嚴(yán)刑等條款作出修改,使刑罰更加寬厚平和。在人才思想方面,房玄齡唯才是舉,特別是打破士族門閥限制,對(duì)寒士出身的才學(xué)之士大力舉薦,比如舉薦了杜如晦、魏收等人,也對(duì)李緯等不稱職官員含蓄表達(dá)了反對(duì)意見。第四章將歷史上對(duì)房玄齡的評(píng)價(jià)進(jìn)行匯集和整理,得出后世歷史學(xué)家對(duì)房玄齡整體評(píng)價(jià)的一致性,即房玄齡政治思想和實(shí)踐具有明顯的儒家政治思想特征。房玄齡是皇帝眼中“運(yùn)籌帷幄、坐安社稷”的功臣,是群臣眼中“孜孜奉國(guó)、知無不為”的良相,也是士大夫文人心中“理致太平、善歸人主”的唐室宗臣,這都是儒家政治理念中的從政典范。第五章將房玄齡與蕭何、趙普進(jìn)行比較研究,認(rèn)為房玄齡的施政是將儒家政治思想理念具體化、實(shí)踐化。從房玄齡與蕭何的比較來看,兩人雖然有吏干之才、愛才惜才、謙恭謹(jǐn)慎、善于謀略的共同點(diǎn),但是,房玄齡相比而言更有文化底蘊(yùn)、更愛惜民力、更加以誠(chéng)待人。從房玄齡與趙普的比較來看,兩人也具有干練多能、多謀善斷、公忠體國(guó)的共同點(diǎn),但是房玄齡更豁達(dá)包容、更大公無私、更清廉自守。因此,與前后兩朝名相相比,房玄齡更加具有儒家賢良宰相的特點(diǎn)。全文通過對(duì)房玄齡的家世淵源的追溯,分析了房玄齡政治思想的來源,也著力挖掘了房玄齡在貞觀時(shí)期儒家政治思想表現(xiàn),又從師友共同政治思想、各個(gè)層面對(duì)房玄齡的歷史評(píng)價(jià)、與前后名相的比較,論證了房玄齡政治思想是以儒家為主導(dǎo)、其他思想為補(bǔ)充的完整思想體系。既有正面分析,也有側(cè)面印證。在論證方法上,既有綜合論證,也有比較分析。最后,本文把房玄齡儒家政治理念放在整個(gè)儒家思想文化發(fā)展的進(jìn)程中進(jìn)行分析評(píng)價(jià),得出結(jié)論,認(rèn)為房玄齡政治思想是儒家政治理念在初唐這個(gè)特定社會(huì)背景下的具體與深化,是對(duì)從春秋時(shí)期以來的儒家政治思想文化的補(bǔ)充、豐富與完善,對(duì)于后世儒家政治思想的發(fā)展,具有重要而深遠(yuǎn)的影響。
[Abstract]:Zhenguan is a famous history of feudal society China, fangxuanling Zhenguan as an important member of the ruling group, together with Du Ruhui to create a "union made by heaven" story. Of the Tang Dynasty political thought, must study the rule of Zhenguan; of Zhenguan, must study the fangxuanling. Decision practice, fangxuanling research in the political thought of Confucianism that is conducive to the formation of Zhenguan find ideological reasons, but also conducive to the deepening of the Confucian political thought understanding. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter carefully combed the fangxuanling life story, in order to have a comprehensive understanding of fangxuanling himself. The author thinks that the fangxuanling life experience at the age of 38 to approximately Li Shimin, before this, fangxuanling in life period, thought gradually mature, the wise bird chooses its branch. After that, fangxuanling assisted Li Shimin to quell the various armed forces That has made an important contribution to the establishment and stability of the Tang Dynasty. In the second chapter, teacher of fangxuanling, friends and colleagues thought comb. Like attracts like., teacher to student, Birds of a feather flock together., influence your thoughts is obvious, can maintain good relationship with colleagues, friends, often have some resonance in thought, through the joint to reveal the features of thought can fangxuanling mentorship, analysis of political and ideological characteristics of fangxuanling from the side. The third chapter will fangxuanling on people-oriented thoughts, political thoughts, talent thought, legal thought, ethnic and national defense and practice thought were sorted and analyzed, to find the Confucian idea from the political practice of the brand. Fangxuanling in political practice against militarism, cherish the people, implement the equal political practice, is that no matter and the thought of the people. In the administration of officials, fangxuanling large Begun institutional reform, the abolition of 1/3 counties to 1/2, will be reduced to 643 members of the civil and military officials, and officials to strengthen evaluation work to reduce administrative efficiency not in streamlining the team officials at the same time. In the rule of law, fair and decent Fang Xuanling advocated the thought of the rule of law, combing himself since the Sui Dynasty legal system, at the same time of harsh laws and torture terms made the punishment more generous and peaceful. In the thought of talent, Fang Xuanling is just, especially officials recommend to break the restrictions, poor background, high intellect force, such as recommending Du Wei received Ruhui, et al., also on Li Wei and incompetent officials implicitly expressed opposition to fourth. Chapter of the history of Fang Xuanling's evaluation of collection and sorting, the consistency of the overall evaluation of Fang Xuanling's later historians, namely Fang Xuanling's political thought and Practice Has the obvious characteristics of Confucian political thoughts. Fangxuanling is the eyes of emperor strategizing, sit the "hero," "the eyes are diligently Fengguo all know," good, but also the literati hearts "for peace, good people" Shizong Tang Chen, this is the political model of Confucian political philosophy in the fifth chapter. The fangxuanling and Xiao He Zhao Pu, a comparative study, that is the fangxuanling policy idea of Confucian political thoughts concrete practice. From the comparison, fangxuanling and Xiao He, although the two official dry only, cherish love, humility, common, good strategy but fangxuanling compared with more culture, more cherish people, more honest. From the comparison of fangxuanling and Zhao Pu, two people also have more capable to serve the country in common, resourceful and decisive, but fangxuanling is more open-minded tolerant, more Selfless, more honest automorphic. Therefore, compared with before and after the two dynasties phase, fangxuanling is more Confucian virtuous characteristics. The thesis traced by Prime Minister fangxuanling on family background, analyzes the sources of fangxuanling political thought, also focus on mining the fangxuanling in Confucian political thought of Zhenguan period performance, and from the common ideological and political teachers all aspects of the historical evaluation, fangxuanling, compared with before and after phase, demonstrates the fangxuanling political ideology is Confucianism as the dominant, to complement the complete ideological system of other ideas. Both positive analysis, there are side confirmed. In the demonstration method, both comprehensive demonstration, are also compared. Finally, this paper take fangxuanling Confucian idea in the cultural development of Confucianism in the process of analysis and evaluation, draw the conclusion that, fangxuanling political thought is Confucian political philosophy in the early Tang Dynasty of this particular agency The concrete and deepening of the background is a supplement to the Confucian political and ideological culture since the spring and Autumn period. It enriches and perfected and has an important and far-reaching influence on the development of Confucian political thought in the later age.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：K242

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 籍成山;;《儒家政治理論及其現(xiàn)代價(jià)值》評(píng)述[J];東方論壇;2012年01期

2 陳露露;;探討儒家政治思想與我國(guó)政治發(fā)展的契合[J];佳木斯教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

3 馬云志;社會(huì)主義政治文明建設(shè)與儒家政治文明[J];絲綢之路;2004年S1期

4 王曰美;近三十年儒家政治思想研究[J];煙臺(tái)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

5 馬云志;論儒家政治文明[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

6 陳明;;儒家政治哲學(xué)的特點(diǎn)及其范式建構(gòu)——以亞里士多德《政治學(xué)》為參照[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2007年12期

7 胡銳軍;;儒家政治秩序的基本樣式[J];江蘇大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年04期

8 路德斌;面對(duì)君權(quán):儒家的思考、理想及其困境──試論儒家政治觀念之根本誤區(qū)和盲點(diǎn)[J];孔子研究;1996年04期

9 任劍濤;人性詰問與早期儒家政治哲學(xué)[J];哲學(xué)研究;1998年04期

10 啟良;;儒家政治哲學(xué)的悖論[J];船山學(xué)刊;2010年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前6條

1 王佐;;儒家政治倫理與中國(guó)現(xiàn)代化的思考[A];文化現(xiàn)代化的戰(zhàn)略思考——第七期中國(guó)現(xiàn)代化研究論壇論文集[C];2009年

2 周桂鈿;;儒家政治哲學(xué)對(duì)當(dāng)今世界政治文明的意義[A];2012學(xué)術(shù)前沿論壇——北京市哲學(xué)會(huì)分論壇“哲學(xué)發(fā)展與文化建設(shè)”論文集[C];2012年

3 周桂鈿;;儒家政治哲學(xué)對(duì)當(dāng)今世界政治文明的意義[A];2012·學(xué)術(shù)前沿論叢——科學(xué)發(fā)展：深化改革與改善民生（上）[C];2012年

4 傅小凡;;儒家政治哲學(xué)與社會(huì)理想[A];“文化建設(shè)與和諧社會(huì)”學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2006年

5 劉邦凡;張園園;;論儒家政治管理的組織人本主義[A];“科學(xué)發(fā)展觀與建設(shè)沿海強(qiáng)省學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)暨河北省自然辯證法研究會(huì)2008年年會(huì)”論文集[C];2008年

6 黃文博;張園園;劉邦凡;;論儒家政治管理思想的軸心意識(shí):政教合一[A];2007年全國(guó)馬克思主義理論學(xué)科建設(shè)論壇論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 南京曉莊學(xué)院教授 邵建;憲政是儒家政治的短板[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)營(yíng)報(bào);2012年

2 劉偉;儒家政治思想的現(xiàn)代價(jià)值[N];中華讀書報(bào);2013年

3 中國(guó)企業(yè)家論壇高級(jí)研究員 岑科;從儒家政治看“中國(guó)模式”[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察報(bào);2011年

4 詩(shī)人學(xué)者、文化批評(píng)家 葉匡政;儒家政治思想中的合法性[N];深圳特區(qū)報(bào);2012年

5 陳叢蘭 西安工業(yè)大學(xué)思政部教師 哲學(xué)博士;“人道惡高危，，虛心戒盈蕩”[N];中國(guó)紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 胡銳軍;理想的訴求與沒落[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 張和年;儒家視野下房玄齡政治思想研究[D];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué);2017年

2 丁瑩瑩;毛澤東對(duì)中國(guó)儒家政治文化的繼承與弘揚(yáng)研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

3 王溪;儒家政治思想的實(shí)踐困境[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

4 楊盼盼;早期儒家政治哲學(xué)初探[D];山東師范大學(xué);2011年

5 李忠義;“明分使群”[D];中共中央黨校;2006年

本文編號(hào)：1636109