本文關(guān)鍵詞： 河姆渡文化 肩脊釜 繩紋 文化交流 文化源流　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：河姆渡文化,是發(fā)現(xiàn)于上世紀(jì)70年代的一支長江下游地區(qū)新石器時(shí)代的考古學(xué)文化,其大致分布區(qū)域?yàn)楹贾轂骋阅系膶幗B地區(qū)到舟山群島一帶,尤以姚江流域的遺址分布最為集中。一直以來,有關(guān)河姆渡文化的研究主要集中于河姆渡遺址本身文化性質(zhì),尤其是第三、四層文化性質(zhì)的探討,而關(guān)于河姆渡文化的整體性研究相對(duì)缺少。隨著近年來傅家山、田螺山等一批新遺址的相繼發(fā)現(xiàn)和發(fā)掘,為進(jìn)一步分析和研究河姆渡文化提供了充足的考古學(xué)材料。為此,以現(xiàn)有的這些材料為出發(fā)點(diǎn),本文對(duì)河姆渡文化的分期、與周鄰考古學(xué)文化的關(guān)系,以及其源流問題進(jìn)行了重新探討,以期對(duì)河姆渡文化有一個(gè)相對(duì)明確的認(rèn)識(shí)和解讀。本文的結(jié)構(gòu)共分為五章。第一章:緒論介紹河姆渡文化的時(shí)空范圍,并就目前的研究現(xiàn)狀和研究成果作了一個(gè)簡短的梳理,概括了河姆渡文化自發(fā)現(xiàn)以來四十余年來的研究歷程,并引出文章的寫作目的和寫作方向。第二章:河姆渡文化的分期與年代從層位明確、遺物相對(duì)豐富的河姆渡遺址出發(fā),通過地層學(xué)及類型學(xué)的對(duì)比分析,總結(jié)河姆渡遺址典型陶器在各個(gè)發(fā)展階段的演變序列,將其分為四期六段。進(jìn)而通過比對(duì)其他遺址的器物,進(jìn)行橫向連接,總結(jié)出河姆渡文化整體的發(fā)展動(dòng)態(tài)。第三章:河姆渡文化與周臨考古學(xué)文化的關(guān)系主要討論河姆渡文化與浙北蘇南地區(qū)馬家浜文化、崧澤文化的關(guān)系。通過典型陶器的對(duì)比,得出河姆渡文化早期階段較多影響馬家浜文化、晚期階段則受到馬家浜文化和崧澤文化單向滲透的結(jié)論。第四章:河姆渡文化的源流相關(guān)探討河姆渡文化的源流應(yīng)從本地區(qū)入手,近年來發(fā)現(xiàn)的跨湖橋文化和上山文化是切入點(diǎn)。通過對(duì)比河姆渡文化與跨湖橋文化的陶器組合與器物特征,得出跨湖橋文化與河姆渡文化之間差異性遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)大于相似性,二者并不屬于同一文化系統(tǒng)。第五章:結(jié)語概括前文寫作得出的相關(guān)結(jié)論,對(duì)河姆渡文化的分期、與周鄰考古學(xué)關(guān)系,以及源流問題進(jìn)行了簡短的總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:Hemudu culture is a Neolithic archaeological culture found in -30s in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Its distribution region is from Ningshao area to Zhoushan Islands south of Hangzhou Bay. In particular, the most concentrated site distribution in the Yao River basin. All along, the research on the Hemudu culture is mainly focused on the cultural nature of the site itself, especially the third and fourth levels of cultural nature. With the discovery and excavation of some new sites such as Fujiashan and Tianluoshan in recent years, the research on the integrity of Hemudu culture is relatively lacking. Sufficient archaeological materials are provided for further analysis and study of Hemudu culture. Therefore, based on the existing materials, this paper divides the culture of Hemudu into stages and its relationship with the archaeological culture of neighboring Zhou. In order to have a relatively clear understanding and interpretation of Hemudu culture, the structure of this paper is divided into five chapters. Chapter one: introduction introduces the space-time scope of Hemudu culture. And the current research status and research results made a brief comb, summarized since the discovery of Hemudu culture since the discovery of more than 40 years of research process. The second chapter: the period and age of Hemudu culture from the clear horizon, relatively rich relics of the site, through stratigraphy and typology comparative analysis. Summarize the evolution sequence of typical pottery in each stage of development, divide it into four stages and six sections, and then compare the artifacts of other sites for horizontal connection. The third chapter: the relationship between Hemudu culture and Zhou Lin archaeological culture mainly discusses the culture of Hemudu and the Majiabang culture in the south of Jiangsu province in the north of Zhejiang. Through the comparison of typical pottery, it is concluded that the early stage of Hemudu culture has more influence on Majiabang culture. In the late stage, the Majiabang culture and Songze culture were infiltrated unidirectionally. Chapter 4th: the origin and flow of Hemudu culture should be started from this region. The cross-lake bridge culture and the mountain culture discovered in recent years are the breakthrough point. By comparing the pottery combination and the ware characteristics between the Hemudu culture and the cross-lake bridge culture. It is concluded that the difference between the culture of cross-lake bridge and the culture of Hemudu is far greater than the similarity, and they do not belong to the same cultural system. Chapter 5th: the conclusion of the conclusion summarized above, the period of the culture of Hemudu. The relationship with Zhou Ling archaeology, as well as the origin of the problem were briefly summarized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：K878

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣樂平;;錢塘江流域的早期新石器時(shí)代及文化譜系研究[J];東南文化;2013年06期

2 孫國平;黃渭金;鄭云飛;劉志遠(yuǎn);徐志清;渠開營;張海真;李永嘉;許慈波;;浙江余姚田螺山新石器時(shí)代遺址2004年發(fā)掘簡報(bào)[J];文物;2007年11期

3 劉恒武;;論寧紹與杭嘉湖地區(qū)新石器時(shí)代文化起源及其流變[J];寧波大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2007年03期

4 蔣樂平,徐軍;北侖沙溪新石器時(shí)代遺址發(fā)掘簡報(bào)[J];南方文物;2005年01期

5 王海明;蔡保全;鐘禮強(qiáng);;浙江余姚市鯔山遺址發(fā)掘簡報(bào)[J];考古;2001年10期

6 王海明;河姆渡遺址與河姆渡文化[J];東南文化;2000年07期

7 吳汝祚;試論河姆渡文化與馬家浜文化的關(guān)系[J];南方文物;1996年03期

8 劉軍 ,王海明;寧紹平原良渚文化初探[J];東南文化;1993年01期

9 王和平;陳金生;;舟山群島發(fā)現(xiàn)新石器時(shí)代遺址[J];考古;1983年01期

10 ;浙江河姆渡遺址第二期發(fā)掘的主要收獲[J];文物;1980年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1479974