本文關鍵詞：繪人人格測驗解釋與評分系統(tǒng)的理論述評　出處：《吉林大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 繪人人格測驗 投射測驗 人格評估 身體意象理論

【摘要】：繪人測驗與主題統(tǒng)覺測驗、羅夏墨跡測驗并稱為三大投射測驗。繪人測驗作為投射測驗的典型代表,一方面被心理咨詢和臨床實踐者經(jīng)常使用,并且被認為是一個可以輔助對來訪者進行診斷與治療的有效工具,另一方面又飽受實證主義者的質疑,認為其存在測量結果難以量化,在傳統(tǒng)心理測量的信度和效度指標上的結果不理想,理論基礎難以證偽等問題。這就導致在實踐者群體中對繪人測驗的臨床應用經(jīng)驗較為豐富,但是在學術文獻中對繪人測驗的研究卻出現(xiàn)相對匱乏的現(xiàn)狀。迄今為止,對繪人測驗的應用研究被劃分為兩種取向:一種取向將繪人測驗應用于兒童智力發(fā)展狀況的測量。另一種取向將繪人測驗應用于對人格的評估及心理問題的診斷。繪人智力測驗憑借其可量化和具有發(fā)展常模等優(yōu)勢,被廣泛的應用于學術研究和實踐應用中,已經(jīng)積累了相對豐富的研究成果。但是,在對繪人人格測驗的研究中,由于缺乏對繪人人格測驗的理論介紹和實踐有效性的探討,因此,該研究取向較少受到學術研究的理論關注。本研究立足于在對繪人人格測驗的理論進行系統(tǒng)梳理的基礎上,重點選取兩類典型的繪人人格測驗,馬科瓦繪人人格測驗和科皮茨繪人人格測驗,分別作為繪人人格測驗質性體系建構和量化體系建構的代表。對其理論基礎、施測方法、解釋系統(tǒng)和評估指標進行系統(tǒng)的介紹,并對這兩種取向各自的優(yōu)勢與不足進行比較性的分析和理論述評,最后對繪人人格測驗的發(fā)展方向進行評價與展望。本研究力求在理論上,為繪人人格測驗研究的理論發(fā)展與實證研究提供文獻支持和研究展望,在實踐上,為繪人人格測驗的本土應用提供理論指導和參照資料。我們可以相信,以上工作不僅有助于推進對繪人人格測驗的學術研究,還有助于發(fā)現(xiàn)已有繪人人格測驗應用中的問題,為完善繪人人格測驗的應用提供實踐上的指導。
[Abstract]:Drawing test and thematic apperception test, Rorschach ink test as three major projection test. As a typical representative of projection test, on the one hand, it is often used by psychological counseling and clinical practitioners. And it is considered to be an effective tool to assist the diagnosis and treatment of visitors. On the other hand, it has been questioned by the positists that its existence measurement results are difficult to quantify. The results of traditional psychological measurement on reliability and validity are not ideal, and the theoretical basis is difficult to be falsified, which leads to rich experience in clinical application of pictorial test in the community of practitioners. However, in the academic literature, there is a relative lack of research on pictorial testing. So far. The research on the application of pictorial test is divided into two orientations:. One is to apply the drawing person test to the measurement of children's intelligence development, the other is to apply the drawing person test to the assessment of personality and the diagnosis of psychological problems. Model and other advantages. Has been widely used in academic research and practical applications, has accumulated relatively rich research results. However, in the study of personality mapping test. Due to the lack of theoretical introduction and practical effectiveness of personality mapping test, therefore. The research orientation is less concerned by academic research. This study is based on the systematic combing of the theory of personality drawing personality test, focusing on the selection of two types of typical personality drawing personality test. As the representative of the construction of the qualitative system and the quantitative system, the Macovar drawing Personality Test and the Coppertz Personality drawing Personality Test are respectively used as the theoretical basis and the testing method for the construction of the qualitative system and the quantitative system of the Personality drawing Test. The system of explanation and evaluation are introduced systematically, and the comparative analysis and theoretical review of the advantages and disadvantages of the two orientations are made. Finally, the development direction of personality mapping test is evaluated and prospected. This study aims to provide literature support and research prospect for the theoretical development and empirical research of personality mapping test in theory and practice. To provide theoretical guidance and reference materials for the local application of personality mapping test, we can believe that the above work is not only helpful to promote the academic research of personality mapping test. It is also helpful to find out the problems in the application of the personality drawing test and to provide practical guidance for the improvement of the application of the personality drawing test.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B848
，

本文編號：1390340