發(fā)布時(shí)間：2021-11-21 01:10

　　語(yǔ)言與身份之間的關(guān)系是一個(gè)十分重要的課題。人類學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)、心理學(xué)、文學(xué)等多個(gè)領(lǐng)域的研究者都對(duì)此進(jìn)行了相關(guān)研究,語(yǔ)言學(xué)學(xué)者也不例外。目前,聚焦身份話語(yǔ)構(gòu)建的研究一般認(rèn)為,會(huì)話參與者在交流互動(dòng)過(guò)程中呈現(xiàn)的社會(huì)身份和個(gè)人身份不是本質(zhì)性的或固定不變的,而是在具體會(huì)話語(yǔ)境中的語(yǔ)用建構(gòu)物。漢語(yǔ)偵查訊問(wèn)話語(yǔ)是一種典型的機(jī)構(gòu)話語(yǔ),它無(wú)疑反映和建構(gòu)了民警和嫌疑人的身份,并昭示二者之間不對(duì)等的權(quán)勢(shì)關(guān)系。然而,當(dāng)前對(duì)漢語(yǔ)偵查訊問(wèn)話語(yǔ)的研究,過(guò)于強(qiáng)調(diào)交際雙方既有的機(jī)構(gòu)身份,忽視二者在具體會(huì)話語(yǔ)境中身份的復(fù)雜性和多面性,更缺乏對(duì)身份構(gòu)建具體語(yǔ)言手段的考察。因此,以漢語(yǔ)偵查訊問(wèn)話語(yǔ)為研究對(duì)象,對(duì)身份的語(yǔ)言構(gòu)建進(jìn)行深入研究具有十分重要的意義。本研究正是通過(guò)考察民警和嫌疑人在會(huì)話中的語(yǔ)言手段,試圖發(fā)現(xiàn)交際雙方在訊問(wèn)過(guò)程中構(gòu)建的多重身份;通過(guò)分析會(huì)話雙方身份構(gòu)建過(guò)程中的沖突和協(xié)商機(jī)制,闡釋影響交際雙方身份構(gòu)建的相關(guān)因素。本研究獲得了相關(guān)部門的許可,收集了某基層派出所100例治安案件的訊問(wèn)錄像。筆者按照J(rèn)efferson的轉(zhuǎn)寫體系對(duì)語(yǔ)料進(jìn)行了轉(zhuǎn)寫,語(yǔ)料一共約十七萬(wàn)字。本研究以會(huì)話分析為研究方法,以對(duì)研究對(duì)象進(jìn)行質(zhì)性分析為... 

【文章來(lái)源】：山東大學(xué)山東省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：305 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
List of Abbreviations
Transcription Symbols
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Rationale for the Study
    1.3 Purpose of the Study
    1.4 Significance of the Study
    1.5 Organization of the Dissertation
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Definition of Key Terms
        2.2.1 Identity and Identity Construction
        2.2.2 Interrogation and Investigative Interview
    2.3 Theoretical Studies on Identity in Discourse
        2.3.1 Social Identity Theory
        2.3.2 Variationist Sociolinguistics and Identity
        2.3.3 Positioning and Identity
        2.3.4 Narrative and Identity
    2.4 Empirical Studies on Identity in Discourse
        2.4.1 Empirical Studies on Identity in Written Discourse
        2.4.2 Empirical Studies on Identity in Oral Discourse
    2.5 Previous Studies on Police Interviews
        2.5.1 Studies on Interrogative Policies and Interrogative Strategies
        2.5.2 Studies on Linguistic Devices Used by Police Officers and Suspects
        2.5.3 Studies on Power Relations in Investigative Interviews
    2.6 Research Gaps and Research Questions
    2.7 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Considerations and Analytic Framework
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Social Constructionism
        3.2.1 Basic Views and Principles of Social Constructionism
        3.2.2 Sociocultural Linguistic Approach Derived from Social Constructionism
    3.3 Interpersonal Pragmatics
    3.4 Theoretical Model for the Present Study
    3.5 Analytic Framework for Identity Construction in Police Interviews
        3.5.1 Dimensions of Conversation Analytic Studies
        3.5.2 A Conversation Analytic Framework for Identity Construction
    3.6 Summary
Chapter Four Methodology
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Research Design
    4.3 Data Collection
    4.4 Data Transcription
    4.5 Data Analysis
    4.6 Summary
Chapter Five Police Officers' Discursive Practices and Identity Construction
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Police Officers' Lexical Choice
        5.2.1 Police Officers' Use of Self-reference Expressions
        5.2.2 Police Officers' Use of Address Terms
        5.2.3 Police Officers' Use of Legalese
    5.3 Police officers' Turn Design
        5.3.1 Police Officers' Use of Formulaic Utterances
        5.3.2 Police Officers' Use of Different Types of Sentences
    5.4 Police officers' Sequence Organization
        5.4.1 Police Officers' Turn Taking in the Interview
        5.4.2 Police Officers' Interruption of Suspects' Turns
        5.4.3 Police Officers' Use of Backchannel
        5.4.4 Police Officers' Management of Topics
        5.4.5 Police Officers' Initiation of Sequence Expansion
    5.5 Police Officers' Discursive Construction of Multiple Identities
    5.6 Summary
Chapter Six Suspects' Discursive Practices and Identity Construction
    6.1 Introduction
    6.2 Suspects' Lexical Choice
        6.2.1 Suspects' Use of Self-reference Expressions
        6.2.2 Suspects' Use of Address Terms
        6.2.3 Suspects' Use of Hedge Expressions
    6.3 Suspects' Turn Design
        6.3.1 Suspects' Use of Direct Speech
        6.3.2 Suspects' Use of Expressions to Normalize
        6.3.3 Suspects' Use of Expressions to Blame Victim
        6.3.4 Suspects' Use of Expressions to Mitigate
        6.3.5 Suspects' Use of Questions
    6.4 Suspects' Sequence Organization
        6.4.1 Suspects' Turn Taking in the Interview
        6.4.2 Suspects' Interruptions of police Officers' Turns
        6.4.3 Suspects' Resistance to Police Officers' Topic Initiation
    6.5 Suspects' Discursive Construction of Multiple Identities
    6.6 Summary
Chapter Seven Disaffiliation and Its Management in Identity Construction
    7.1 Introduction
    7.2 Disaffiliation Arising from Police Officers
        7.2.1 Sources of Disaffiliation Involved in Police Officers' Turns
        7.2.2 Initiating Strategies Used by Suspects
        7.2.3 Police Officers' Feedback
    7.3 Disaffiliation Arising from Suspects
        7.3.1 Sources of Disaffiliation Involved in Suspects' Turns
        7.3.2 Initiating Strategies Used by Police Officers
        7.3.3 Suspects' Feedback
    7.4 Summary
Chapter Eight Mechanism of Identity Construction in Police Interviews
    8.1 Introduction
    8.2 Model of Identity Construction in Police Interviews
    8.3 Influencing Factors of Identity Construction in Police Interviews
        8.3.1 Communicative Objectives
        8.3.2 Recipient-designed Utterances
        8.3.3 Knowledge and Epistemics
        8.3.4 Interpersonal Relations
    8.4 Summary
Chapter Nine Conclusion
    9.1 Major Findings of the Present Study
    9.2 Implications of the Present Study
    9.3 Limitations of the Present Study
    9.4 Suggestions for Future Study
References
Appendix Ⅰ
Acknowledgements
Publications
附件



本文編號(hào)：3508456