本文選題：警察 + 行政權(quán)��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2017年博士論文

【摘要】：警察行政處罰權(quán)是警察行政執(zhí)法的核心權(quán)力之一,也是出現(xiàn)失范亂象的重災(zāi)區(qū)。對這一權(quán)力進(jìn)行規(guī)制是新形勢下我國政治體制改革必須破解的法治難題,具有重大的理論意義和現(xiàn)實意義。本文首先從理論角度研究警察行政處罰權(quán),分別從公權(quán)力的本質(zhì)屬性上歸結(jié)出其具有的基本特點(diǎn)和法律依據(jù);從警察行政處罰權(quán)的配置和運(yùn)行上,批判地借鑒"監(jiān)管者"、"守夜人"模式,提出我國警察行政改革的方向是轉(zhuǎn)換為"服務(wù)者"模式;從法理角度上確定了私權(quán)利與公權(quán)力的平衡、賦權(quán)與控權(quán)的平衡、依法行政與自由裁量的平衡作為警察行政處罰權(quán)規(guī)制的根基。改革不能閉門造車,筆者將我國與域外警察行政處罰權(quán)進(jìn)行比較研究,進(jìn)一步明確規(guī)制的目標(biāo)與方向。然后,對我國警察行政處罰權(quán)的現(xiàn)實狀況進(jìn)行剖析,通過近年來發(fā)生的諸多典型案件進(jìn)行梳理和歸納,將一般警察行政處罰權(quán)失范現(xiàn)象歸結(jié)為警察行政主體不適格、警察行政作為違法和警察行政不作為違法等類型;將特殊警察行政處罰權(quán)失范現(xiàn)象歸結(jié)為收容教育制度失范、勞動教養(yǎng)制度廢止后替代措施失范等類型。并重點(diǎn)對產(chǎn)生問題的主要原因進(jìn)行闡述,警察行政處罰權(quán)的強(qiáng)大與自主是其易侵犯私權(quán)利的內(nèi)在屬性;我國體制與制度上的滯后發(fā)展是該權(quán)力失范運(yùn)行的外部環(huán)境;從時間經(jīng)線上去追溯,這一問題的形成有著深刻的歷史背景與思想文化根基;從空間緯線上去考量,我國社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期的矛盾凸顯,也造成權(quán)力運(yùn)行發(fā)生偏差。最后,從與發(fā)達(dá)國家地區(qū)的比較研究中,明確我國警察行政處罰權(quán)規(guī)制必須樹立起警察行政處罰法定原則、警察行政處罰比例原則和警務(wù)公共、公開、公正原則等基本原則。從理論結(jié)合實務(wù)層面著重探討警察行政處罰權(quán)規(guī)制的制度選擇和路徑,對頗具共性意義的一般警察行政處罰權(quán)規(guī)制路徑進(jìn)行集中闡述,從樹立服務(wù)理念、完善法律體系、限制自由裁量權(quán)、改進(jìn)聽證制度和健全救濟(jì)制度等方面提出對策建議。并將特殊警察行政處罰權(quán)規(guī)制路徑單獨(dú)列出,對廢止收容教育制度和后勞動教養(yǎng)時代的發(fā)展趨勢提出了具體觀點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:Police administrative punishment power is one of the core powers of police administrative law enforcement, and it is also a serious disaster area.The regulation of this power is a difficult problem of the rule of law which must be solved in the political system reform of our country under the new situation, which has great theoretical and practical significance.This paper first studies the police administrative punishment power from a theoretical point of view, respectively from the nature of the public power to sum up its basic characteristics and legal basis, from the police administrative punishment power configuration and operation,Using the mode of "supervisor" and "watchman" for reference critically, this paper puts forward that the direction of police administrative reform in our country is to transform the mode of "service person", and from the angle of legal theory, it determines the balance between private right and public power, and the balance between empowerment and control power.The balance between administration by law and discretion is the foundation of the regulation of police administrative penalty power.The reform cannot be done behind closed doors. The author makes a comparative study of the administrative punishment power of our country and the police outside the country, and further clarifies the goal and direction of regulation.Then, it analyzes the reality of police administrative punishment power in our country. Through combing and summing up many typical cases in recent years, the phenomenon of general police administrative penalty power loss is attributed to police administrative subject discomfort.The police administration as illegal and the police administrative omission illegal and so on, the special police administrative penalty power loss phenomenon is attributed to the detention education system to be out of order, and the alternative measures after the abolition of the re-education through labour system to be out of the norm and so on.The main reasons for the problems are discussed in detail. The strong and independent power of the police administrative punishment is the inherent attribute of its vulnerable private rights, the lagging development of the system and system in our country is the external environment in which the power is out of order.The formation of this problem has a profound historical background and ideological and cultural foundation. From the perspective of spatial latitude, the contradictions in the period of social transformation in our country are highlighted, which also cause deviation in the operation of power.Finally, from the comparative study between China and developed countries, it is clear that the regulation of police administrative punishment power in China must set up the principle of police administrative punishment law, the principle of proportion of police administrative punishment and the principle of public, public, fair and so on.From the angle of theory and practice, this paper focuses on the system choice and path of the regulation of police administrative punishment power, and expounds the common administrative punishment power regulation path of general police in order to set up the service idea and perfect the legal system.To limit the discretion, improve the hearing system and improve the relief system.And the special police administrative punishment right regulation path is listed separately, has put forward the concrete viewpoint to abolish the reception education system and the development trend of the post-reeducation through labor era.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.14
，

本文編號：1764553