本文選題：體質(zhì) + 體質(zhì)健康　； 參考：《北京體育大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：研究目的本研究通過(guò)體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)理論與實(shí)證研究,建立城鎮(zhèn)成年人體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)體系,健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)尺度標(biāo)度法確定體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)等級(jí)界值點(diǎn),使成年人在獲得其體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)等級(jí)的同時(shí)也獲得相對(duì)應(yīng)的健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)度,不僅為其科學(xué)健身提供效果評(píng)價(jià),而且激勵(lì)成年人積極的進(jìn)行科學(xué)健康管理以減低慢病發(fā)生的幾率。同時(shí)通過(guò)對(duì)成年人體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)評(píng)價(jià)方法的探究,為其他年齡人群的體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)提供方法學(xué)依據(jù)。研究方法實(shí)驗(yàn)法獲得體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的實(shí)測(cè)數(shù)據(jù),層次分析法獲得體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)的類(lèi)指標(biāo)權(quán)重,因子分析法獲得體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)權(quán)重,測(cè)量指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù)經(jīng)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化后加權(quán)計(jì)算獲得體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)總分,健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)尺度標(biāo)度的方法確定體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)等級(jí)劃分的界值點(diǎn)。研究結(jié)果與結(jié)論(1)對(duì)體質(zhì)健康進(jìn)行定義。體質(zhì)健康(Health-related fitness)是指機(jī)體內(nèi)客觀存在的一些要素,它們的提高能夠使機(jī)體輕松應(yīng)對(duì)環(huán)境中風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素,并表現(xiàn)出良好的健康狀態(tài),這種機(jī)體固有的特質(zhì)稱(chēng)為體質(zhì)健康。集中這些要素進(jìn)行體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)的核心理念是各要素須具備對(duì)疾病風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的易感性,且須與個(gè)體健康狀態(tài)密切相關(guān)。(2)按照與健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)或疾病關(guān)聯(lián)性原則,確定了身體成分、心肺功能、肌肉力量與耐力、柔韌性、心理狀態(tài)共同構(gòu)成體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)五元理論模型,且年齡分層后的五元理論模型能夠得到實(shí)證數(shù)據(jù)支持。(3)初步建立了20~59歲成年人體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。20~59歲成年人體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)中,類(lèi)指標(biāo)身體成分、肌肉力量與耐力、心肺功能、柔韌性、心理狀態(tài)的權(quán)重分別為:0.2069、0.2106、0.3318、0.0667、0.1840。20~39歲成年人身體成分評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體脂率、腰臀比、BMI權(quán)重分別為0.428、0.267、0.305,心肺功能評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)最大攝氧量、收縮壓和舒張壓權(quán)重分別為0.403、0.307、0.290;肌肉力量與耐力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)握力、肩上啞鈴?fù)婆e、平板支撐和深蹲的權(quán)重分別為0.290、0.237、0.245、0.228。40~59歲成年人身體成分評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體脂率、腰臀比、BMI權(quán)重分別為0.345、0.296、0.359,心肺功能評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)最大攝氧量、收縮壓和舒張壓權(quán)重分別為0.345、0.314、0.341;肌肉力量與耐力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)握力、肩上啞鈴?fù)婆e、平板支撐和深蹲的權(quán)重分別為0.228、0.277、0.225、0.270。(4)根據(jù)影響體質(zhì)健康的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)因素判斷,采用疾病或健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)尺度標(biāo)度法,確定20~59歲成年人體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)等級(jí)劃分的界值點(diǎn),該等級(jí)劃分法強(qiáng)調(diào)健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分層的現(xiàn)實(shí)意識(shí)。(5)初步建立了20~59歲城鎮(zhèn)成年人體質(zhì)健康綜合評(píng)價(jià)參考標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:Objective to establish a comprehensive evaluation system for urban adults' physical health by means of the theory and empirical study of comprehensive evaluation of physical health. The health risk scale method was used to determine the threshold of comprehensive evaluation of physical health.It not only makes adults get the comprehensive evaluation grade of their physical health, but also obtains the corresponding health risk degree, which not only provides the effect evaluation for their scientific fitness,And encourage adults to actively engage in scientific health management to reduce the incidence of chronic disease.At the same time, the comprehensive evaluation method of adult physical health is explored to provide methodological basis for the comprehensive evaluation of physical health of other age groups.Methods the experimental method was used to obtain the measured data of comprehensive evaluation index of physical health, the weight of class index of comprehensive evaluation of physical health was obtained by analytic hierarchy process, and the weight of evaluation index of comprehensive evaluation of physical health was obtained by factor analysis method.The total score of comprehensive evaluation of physical health was obtained by weighted calculation after standardization of the measured index data. The method of scale of health risk scale was used to determine the boundary value point of grading of comprehensive evaluation of physical health.Study results and conclusions 1) the definition of physical health.Health related fitnessrefers to some factors that exist objectively in the body. Their improvement can make the body easily deal with the risk factors in the environment and show good health. This inherent characteristic of the body is called physical health.The core idea of concentrating these factors on comprehensive evaluation of physical health is that each element must be susceptible to disease risk, and must be closely related to individual health status. (2) according to the principle of association with health risk or disease, the body composition is determined.Cardiopulmonary function, muscle strength and endurance, flexibility and mental state together constitute a five-element theory model for comprehensive evaluation of physical health.The five-element theory model after age stratification can be supported by empirical data. (3) A comprehensive evaluation index system of physical health of adults aged 20 to 59 years is established preliminarily. In the comprehensive evaluation of physical health of adults aged 20 to 59 years, the body components, muscle strength and endurance of similar indicators are established.The weights of cardiopulmonary function, flexibility and mental state were respectively: 0. 2069 / 0.2106 / 0.331866 / 0.1880 / 0.0667 / 0.1848 0.200.20 / 39, body fat ratio, BMI weight of WHR / BMI were 0.4280.267- 0.305, respectively, and the maximal oxygen intake of cardiopulmonary function was 0.331866 / 0.3318 / 0.0667 / 0.180.200.20 / 39, respectively, and the weight of BMI was 0.4280.267- 0.305, respectively.The weight of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were 0.403 and 0.3070.290 respectively. The weight of muscle strength and endurance index, the weight of shoulder dumbbell, plate support and squat were 0.290 ~ 0.2370.2450.228.4059 years old adults' body composition evaluation index body fat rate, respectively.The BMI weight of waist to hip ratio was 0.345 ~ 0.296 ~ 0.359.The maximal oxygen uptake, systolic pressure and diastolic pressure were 0.345 and 0.314 ~ 0.341, respectively, and the weight of muscle strength and endurance were 0.345 ~ 0.296 ~ 0.359.The weight of weight of heart and lung function evaluation index was 0.345 ~ 0.314 ~ 0.341.The grip strength of muscle strength and endurance index and shoulder dumbbell were recommended.The weights of plate support and squat were 0.2280.277g 0.2250.270.0.44) according to the risk factors affecting physical health, the threshold value of the comprehensive evaluation grade of physical health of adults aged 20 ~ 59 years was determined by using the scale method of disease or health risk.The classification method emphasizes the realistic consciousness of health risk stratification. (5) A reference standard for the comprehensive evaluation of the physical health of adults aged 20 to 59 years in urban areas is established preliminarily.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京體育大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G804.49

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 溫涵;梁韻斯;;結(jié)構(gòu)方程模型常用擬合指數(shù)檢驗(yàn)的實(shí)質(zhì)[J];心理科學(xué);2015年04期

2 蒯放;;根源、屬性、范疇:論體質(zhì)的內(nèi)涵及其與健康的關(guān)系[J];山東體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年05期

3 王國(guó)軍;徐培林;虞麗娟;;功能內(nèi)穩(wěn)態(tài)理論與健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分級(jí)理念下的亞健康理論重構(gòu)[J];體育學(xué)刊;2014年01期

4 郭璐;;大學(xué)生運(yùn)動(dòng)員應(yīng)對(duì)方式的特點(diǎn)及其與自我意識(shí)的關(guān)系——一項(xiàng)典型相關(guān)研究[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年02期

5 桂海榮;張雅玲;孫計(jì)金;盛彥;郝文亭;;“體質(zhì)健康”思辨[J];沈陽(yáng)體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期

6 郭金玉;張忠彬;孫慶云;;層次分析法的研究與應(yīng)用[J];中國(guó)安全科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

7 徐曉敏;;層次分析法的運(yùn)用[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2008年01期

8 趙書(shū)祥;;體質(zhì)綜合評(píng)價(jià)中層次分析法的應(yīng)用研究[J];北京體育大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年07期

9 王正倫;孫飆;戴劍松;;大學(xué)生體質(zhì)與體力活動(dòng)的相關(guān)分析和研究[J];武漢體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年12期

10 尹邁曼;張繁榮;喻祝仙;;大學(xué)生體質(zhì)健康測(cè)試項(xiàng)目的完善研究[J];沈陽(yáng)體育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 馮玉娟;體育課三重效能對(duì)大學(xué)生休閑時(shí)體育活動(dòng)行為的影響[D];北京體育大學(xué);2015年

2 陳慶果;老年人人體適應(yīng)能力量表和常模的研制及其在體質(zhì)研究中的應(yīng)用[D];北京體育大學(xué);2012年

3 任弘;體質(zhì)研究中人體適應(yīng)能力的理論與實(shí)證研究[D];北京體育大學(xué);2004年

4 蘇為華;多指標(biāo)綜合評(píng)價(jià)理論與方法問(wèn)題研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 杜秀芳;大同市老年人體質(zhì)健康狀況的調(diào)查與研究[D];太原理工大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1748904