本文關(guān)鍵詞：戰(zhàn)略對接對崛起國家海權(quán)發(fā)展成敗的影響研究　出處：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 崛起國家 戰(zhàn)略對接 海權(quán) 系統(tǒng)能量傳送力

【摘要】：本文的研究主題來源于現(xiàn)實情況與歷史問題相結(jié)合所導(dǎo)致的困惑。一方面,當(dāng)下中國自提出"一帶一路"倡議后,積極構(gòu)建與一些重要國家的戰(zhàn)略對接關(guān)系,同時作為崛起大國,中國的海權(quán)事業(yè)也在蓬勃發(fā)展,那么在復(fù)雜的國際環(huán)境下,中國對外構(gòu)建戰(zhàn)略對接的行為對海權(quán)領(lǐng)域的發(fā)展會起到推動作用還是阻礙作用?另一方面,為什么在19世紀(jì)末至第二次世界大戰(zhàn)期間,美國和德國作為崛起國家都在發(fā)展海權(quán),且這種行為都挑戰(zhàn)了英國的海洋霸主地位,但是最終美國勝利了而德國卻失敗了?基于上述困惑,并結(jié)合當(dāng)下時事,本文采用了一個新的角度,即從戰(zhàn)略對接的視角來研究海權(quán)。因此,本文要研究的核心問題是:國家間構(gòu)建的戰(zhàn)略對接如何影響崛起國家海權(quán)發(fā)展成敗?并進一步提出了本文的核心假設(shè):不同戰(zhàn)略對接的選擇會通過系統(tǒng)能量傳送力影響崛起國家海權(quán)發(fā)展成敗。本文的核心觀點是:建立戰(zhàn)略對接的兩國作為國際系統(tǒng)之下的子系統(tǒng),會在系統(tǒng)能量傳送力的作用下對其中一國內(nèi)部某一具體領(lǐng)域的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生影響。為了論證這一觀點及驗證研究假設(shè),本文采用了詮釋法、模型分析法和案例法�；舅悸肥菍议g建立的戰(zhàn)略對接關(guān)系視為國際系統(tǒng)之下的"子系統(tǒng)",它具有系統(tǒng)的屬性和功能,由兩個國家構(gòu)成,但真正起推動作用的是國家內(nèi)部的各個發(fā)展領(lǐng)域。在本文中,國家被定義為一級單元,國內(nèi)的發(fā)展領(lǐng)域被定義為二級單元。本文研究的重點就是子系統(tǒng)與二級單元之間的關(guān)系。因此,本文中提出了一個重要概念,即"系統(tǒng)能量傳送力",它是連接子系統(tǒng)到二級單元之間的重要紐帶,是能量在系統(tǒng)內(nèi)進行轉(zhuǎn)移和傳送的重要機制,它發(fā)揮作用·需要依托供需關(guān)系的平衡、戰(zhàn)略對接模式、戰(zhàn)略對接國和戰(zhàn)略對接領(lǐng)域的選擇。有了這一機制,就能夠解釋"子系統(tǒng)"是如何對二級單元的發(fā)展施加影響,從而為戰(zhàn)略對接對海權(quán)的影響提供解釋力。接下來,本文采用了案例驗證的方法,使用美國和德國海權(quán)發(fā)展成敗這一正一反兩個案例對研究假設(shè)進行驗證。為了使兩個案例具有統(tǒng)一性,案例的時間范圍都控制在自1890年至1945年這長達半個世紀(jì)的時間段內(nèi)。在經(jīng)過兩個歷史案例驗證后,本文又以系統(tǒng)理論為指導(dǎo),對案例驗證得出的基本結(jié)論進行理論上的提煉和升華,進而得出四點結(jié)論:第一,戰(zhàn)略對接建立與維持的基本原則是兩國供需關(guān)系的平衡;第二,戰(zhàn)略對接對海權(quán)的影響取決于對接模式、對接國和對接領(lǐng)域的選擇;第三,系統(tǒng)能量傳送力是戰(zhàn)略對接得以跨層次影響海權(quán)發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵機制;第四,國家間體系與國家內(nèi)部發(fā)展領(lǐng)域之間存在雙向建構(gòu)關(guān)系。根據(jù)以上四點結(jié)論,本文給出的政策建議是:首先,中國在進行戰(zhàn)略對接時必須要仔細(xì)權(quán)衡本國的戰(zhàn)略需求程度和戰(zhàn)略供給能力,避免"供需失衡"情況的出現(xiàn);其次,中國在構(gòu)建戰(zhàn)略對接時要基于本國海權(quán)等重點發(fā)展領(lǐng)域的需求,對戰(zhàn)略對接模式、戰(zhàn)略對接國和戰(zhàn)略對接領(lǐng)域進行慎重的選擇;最后,國家應(yīng)盡量建立海權(quán)領(lǐng)域的直接戰(zhàn)略對接,如果在其他領(lǐng)域進行對接,也應(yīng)通過合理的規(guī)劃與調(diào)整,使在非海權(quán)領(lǐng)域的戰(zhàn)略對接能夠起到反哺海權(quán)的作用。最終實現(xiàn)戰(zhàn)略對接與海權(quán)領(lǐng)域相互促進,協(xié)同發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The research topic of this article comes from the confusion caused by the combination of the reality and the historical problems. On the one hand, the current China since the introduction of The Belt and Road "initiative, and actively build the strategic docking relationship of some important countries, at the same time as a rising power, China sea power business is also booming, so in the complex international environment, the development of foreign Chinese constructing strategic docking behavior of sea power in the field of play to promote or hinder? On the other hand, why during the late nineteenth Century to the Second World War, the United States and Germany as emerging countries in the development of sea power, and this behavior have challenged the British marine hegemony, but the final victory of the United States and Germany failed? Based on the above problems, combined with the current current, this paper adopts a new angle, namely from a strategic perspective to study the docking of sea power. Therefore, the core issue of this article is: the national strategic docking construction how to influence the rise of state of sea power development success? And further puts forward the core hypothesis of the thesis: different strategic choice through the docking system of energy transfer effect rise of state of sea power development success. The core point of this paper is to establish a strategic docking of two countries as subsystems under the international system, which will have an impact on the development of one specific part of the domestic sector under the action of the system's energy transmission force. In order to prove this point of view and to verify the hypothesis, this paper adopts the interpretation method, the model analysis method and the case method. The basic idea is to regard the strategic docking relationship between countries as a sub system under the international system. It has system attributes and functions, consisting of two countries, but what really promotes is the various development fields within the country. In this article, the state is defined as a first level unit, and the development of the country is defined as a two level unit. The focus of this paper is the relationship between the subsystem and the two level unit. Therefore, this paper proposes an important concept, namely "energy transfer system", it is connected to the system and an important link between two units, is an important mechanism of energy transfer and transfer within the system, it can play a role, need to rely on the relationship of supply and demand balance, strategic docking mode, strategic docking in China and the choice of strategic docking. With this mechanism, it will be able to explain how the "subsystem" affects the development of the two level unit, thus providing an explanation for the impact of strategic docking on sea rights. Then, this paper uses a case study to verify the research hypothesis using the two cases of the success or failure of the development of the American and German sea rights. In order to make the two cases unified, the time range of the case is controlled in the half century period from 1890 to 1945. After two historical cases after verification, this paper is guided by the system theory, the basic conclusion of the case verify that the refining and sublimation of the theory, and then draw four conclusions: first, establish the basic principles and maintain strategic docking between the two countries is the relationship between supply and demand balance; second, strategic docking effect on sea power depending on the docking mode, docking and docking areas; third, the system energy transfer force is the key mechanism of strategic docking to influence the development of sea power and cross level; fourth, there is a two-way relationship between national construction system and national development within the area. According to the above four conclusions, policy recommendations in this paper are: first, China must carefully weigh their strategic docking strategy and strategic demand supply capacity, to avoid "the imbalance of supply and demand situation; secondly, China to based on their sea power needs of key development areas in the construction of strategic docking. By careful choice of strategic docking mode, strategic docking and strategic docking areas; finally, countries should try to establish a direct docking strategy of sea power field, if the docking in other areas, should be through the planning and reasonable adjustment, make strategic docking in the field of non sea power can play the role of nurturing sea power. The final realization of the strategic docking and the field of sea power to promote each other, coordinated development.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D815
，

本文編號：1342305