蘇世屏《金匱要略原文真義》的學(xué)術(shù)思想研究
本文選題:蘇世屏 + 金匱要略原文真義。 參考:《廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:蘇世屏是近現(xiàn)代嶺南崇尚仲景學(xué)術(shù)的一名傷寒派醫(yī)家,其著作《金匱要略原文真義》撰寫于公元1955年12月,共四卷,是對仲景學(xué)術(shù)研究的代表作之一。蘇世屏注釋《金匱要略》采用逐節(jié)串注的方式,其體例完善,結(jié)構(gòu)嚴(yán)謹(jǐn),注論以《內(nèi)經(jīng)》、《難經(jīng)》、《神農(nóng)本草經(jīng)》、《傷寒論》、《備急千金要方》、《諸病源候論》等經(jīng)典醫(yī)籍為依據(jù),參以己見,以闡發(fā)《金匱》原旨。但由于該書近期才由其弟子方恩澤整理出版,當(dāng)代嶺南醫(yī)家對此書聞之甚少,對蘇世屏其人亦是不甚了解,故本文對《金匱要略原文真義》學(xué)術(shù)思想及其作者蘇世屏的生平信息進(jìn)行整理研究,使之為當(dāng)代嶺南仲景學(xué)說研究提供學(xué)術(shù)借鑒。本文從三個部分進(jìn)行研究:第一部分為蘇世屏生平事跡。介紹了蘇世屏的生平、行醫(yī)著書經(jīng)歷、從事的中醫(yī)教育活動以及著書簡介。第二部分為蘇世屏《金匱要略原文真義》的體例結(jié)構(gòu)及注釋特點。本書是以陳修園《金匱要略淺注》為藍(lán)本而著,故本部分將從新增的內(nèi)容、刪去的內(nèi)容以及編次體例的變化等三個方面進(jìn)行對比,闡述二者體例結(jié)構(gòu)的不同。該書以"串注"為基本特色,善用對比,糾注家之誤,考據(jù)嚴(yán)謹(jǐn),表現(xiàn)出了一定的注釋特點。第三部分為蘇世屏《金匱要略原文真義》的學(xué)術(shù)思想。主要概括為以下幾點:1、《金匱要略原文真義》的學(xué)術(shù)傳承:通過對本書的研究,認(rèn)識到蘇世屏的《金匱要略原文真義》應(yīng)歸屬于尊旨醫(yī)經(jīng)派,其尊經(jīng)思想占據(jù)全書主導(dǎo)。不僅表現(xiàn)在蘇氏本人對古人治學(xué)之敬仰,書中大量引用經(jīng)文的注釋方式,亦可明其崇尚經(jīng)典。2、論《金匱》與《傷寒》存有虛邪與正邪之異:《金匱》皆論雜病為虛邪傷形而《傷寒》則為正邪傷氣的觀點是蘇世屏對仲景學(xué)術(shù)認(rèn)識的獨到之處。認(rèn)為《傷寒》是以三陰三陽之經(jīng)氣為基礎(chǔ),其病是由正邪實風(fēng)損傷人之經(jīng)氣所致,具有一定的一致性,故統(tǒng)稱三陰三陽之為病;《金匱》則是以有形之體質(zhì)為基礎(chǔ),其病由虛邪賊風(fēng)損傷人之身形所致,病源復(fù)雜。蘇世屏的這一認(rèn)識為理解《金匱》與《傷寒》之不同從系統(tǒng)上厘清了頭緒。3、推崇六氣標(biāo)本中氣之說:在蘇世屏《金匱要略原文真義》中,亦可看出其對六氣標(biāo)本中氣學(xué)說之推崇。本文通過論述蘇世屏對六氣標(biāo)本中氣本質(zhì)的認(rèn)識,探討了蘇世屏如何運用六氣標(biāo)本中氣之說闡釋疾病的因、證、脈、治。4、強調(diào)脈法遵古,脈證合勘:詳細(xì)闡述了古人脈診之法,認(rèn)為仲師論脈皆遍診寸口趺陽少陰,且各穴獨立,部署分明,為研究仲景脈學(xué)提供了參考。同時,注重脈證合勘,提出治病必須憑證認(rèn)脈,并在此基礎(chǔ)上,或舍證從脈,或舍脈從證,以此準(zhǔn)確審察疾病之真假虛實。5、注解經(jīng)方獨樹一幟,處方用藥謹(jǐn)遵成法:蘇世屏注解經(jīng)方,善從多角度進(jìn)行全面解析,其對經(jīng)方的理解,亦有不同于其他注家的地方。此外,蘇氏處方用藥嚴(yán)格,尤其是對經(jīng)方的運用,主張謹(jǐn)遵仲師之成法,以少加減為宜。6、悟仲景言外之旨,舉一反三論病:蘇世屏對《金匱》為全文注釋,但在注釋過程中卻并未僅就經(jīng)文本身而注,其常悟仲景言外之旨,以舉一反三之法闡發(fā)仲景之本義。結(jié)論:《金匱要略原文真義》以經(jīng)典為依據(jù),以闡發(fā)仲景原義為其旨,加之獨到見解,對《金匱要略》作了系統(tǒng)地詮釋。全書以"串注""為特點,直貫全論。書中所體現(xiàn)的學(xué)術(shù)思想與歷代《金匱要略》注家有所不同,是一部重要的研究仲景雜病學(xué)術(shù)的文獻(xiàn)專著。
[Abstract]:Su Shiping is a typhoid school who advocates Zhongjing academic in modern South of the Five Ridges. His book, "the original meaning of the Golden Chamber" was written in December 1955, a total of four volumes. It is one of the representative works of Zhong Jing's academic research. "Shen Nong Jing Jing", < typhoid theory >, "to prepare for a thousand gold", "the origin of the disease" and other classic medical books, and other classic medical books, to elucidate the original purpose of the "Golden Chamber", but because the book was recently compiled by his disciple Fang Enze, the contemporary south of the Five Ridges doctors heard little about this book and did not know much about Su Shiping, so this article is true to the text of the golden chamber. The academic thought and his author Su Shiping's life information were collated and studied to provide academic reference for the study of the contemporary south of the Five Ridges Zhongjing theory. This article studies from three parts: the first part is Su Shiping's life story. It introduces the life of Su Shiping, the experience of writing books, the educational activities of traditional Chinese medicine and the introduction of books. Second This part of the book is based on the three aspects of the new content, the content of the deletion and the changes of the composition, and the difference in the structure of the two cases. The book is based on "string injection" as the basic special. The third part is the academic thought of "the original meaning of the Golden Chamber". The main summary is the following points: 1, the academic inheritance of the original meaning of the text of the Golden Chamber: through the study of this book, it is recognized that Su Shiping's "the original meaning of the golden chamber of the Golden Chamber" should be assigned. With respect to the Confucian classics, he respected the Confucian classics to dominate the book, not only in the admiration of the ancient people, but also in a large number of references to the annotations of the Scriptures, as well as in the classical.2, and on the differences between the golden chamber and the typhoid. Su Shiping was unique in Zhong Jing's academic understanding. It was thought that "typhoid" was based on the three yin and three Yang's meridian qi. The disease was caused by the damage of the positive and evil spirit, which had certain consistency. Therefore, it was called the disease of three yin and three yang; "the Golden Chamber" was based on the physical constitution, and its disease was caused by the body shape of the false evil thieves, and the disease was recovered. This understanding of Su Shi screen has made a clear understanding of the difference between "Golden Chamber" and "typhoid" from the system of ".3", and praised the theory of "Qi" in the six gas specimen: in Su Shi Ping "the original meaning of the Golden Chamber", it can also be seen in the worship of the Qi theory of the six gas specimens. This article discusses Su Shiping's understanding of the essence of gas in the six gas specimens, and discusses the Soviet Union. How to explain the cause, syndrome, pulse and.4 of the disease by means of the theory of "Qi" in the six gas samples, emphasizing the pulse method to follow the ancient times and the exploration of pulse syndrome, this paper expounds the pulse diagnosis method of the ancient people in detail. On this basis, and on this basis, or giving evidence from the pulse, or giving the pulse from the evidence, to examine the true and false.5 of the disease, the prescription of the prescription is unique, the prescription medication should follow the law: Su Shi Ping annotates the classics, good from many angles, and the understanding of the Confucian classics is different from the other places. In addition, the Su prescription is strict. Especially for the use of the Confucian classics, it is advocated to comply with the law of Zhong Shi, to reduce and subtract as appropriate.6, to realize the theme of "anti three theory", and to give an annotation to the full text of "the Golden Chamber", but in the process of the annotation, he did not only note the text itself, and it often explained the original meaning of Zhong Jing by the law of Su Shiping. Hara Bunmagi, on the basis of classic, to elucidate the meaning of Zhong Jing Yuan as its purport and his unique opinion, systematically interprets the outline of the golden chamber. The book is characterized by "string injection", and the academic thought embodied in the book is different from that of the Golden Chamber of the past dynasties. It is an important literature monograph on the study of Zhongjing miscellaneous disease.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:R222
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 成曉玉;楊東方;;曹穎甫對《金匱要略》的闡釋發(fā)微[J];吉林中醫(yī)藥;2016年01期
2 周易;傅延齡;;余無言辨治奔豚病[J];安徽中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年04期
3 李楠;高飛;;曹穎甫治學(xué)方法與學(xué)術(shù)思想探討[J];中國中醫(yī)基礎(chǔ)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2013年01期
4 任宏麗;段逸山;;民國期刊《中國醫(yī)學(xué)月刊》研究[J];遼寧中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報;2012年12期
5 王新佩;王慶國;;《金匱要略》注家沿革與學(xué)派探討[J];北京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年04期
6 張公奇;;曹穎甫《傷寒金匱發(fā)微》學(xué)術(shù)思想探討[J];陜西中醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年03期
7 李成衛(wèi),王慶國;《金匱要略》學(xué)術(shù)研究史略[J];中國中醫(yī)基礎(chǔ)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2005年06期
8 張公奇;周科選;;曹穎甫的傷寒金匱發(fā)微和經(jīng)方實踐[J];中國中醫(yī)藥現(xiàn)代遠(yuǎn)程教育;2004年09期
9 何永明;經(jīng)方家曹穎甫研究現(xiàn)狀評述[J];中醫(yī)文獻(xiàn)雜志;2001年03期
10 黃仰模,郭世光,陳光星;從《讀過金匱卷十九》看陳伯壇的學(xué)術(shù)思想[J];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報;1999年04期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 劉冠軍;《皇漢醫(yī)學(xué)》學(xué)術(shù)思想研究[D];山東中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2008年
,本文編號:1869018
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/mpalunwen/1869018.html