本文關(guān)鍵詞： 腰椎間盤突出癥 核心肌群穩(wěn)定性 艾灸 運(yùn)動訓(xùn)練　出處：《南京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：目的:觀察腰椎間盤突出癥患者射頻消融術(shù)后核心肌力訓(xùn)練聯(lián)合艾灸治療的臨床療效。方法:將60例已進(jìn)行單針單節(jié)射頻消融術(shù)治療的腰椎間盤突出癥患者隨機(jī)分為常規(guī)治療組(C組,n=20)、核心肌力訓(xùn)練組(E組,n=22)和核心肌力訓(xùn)練聯(lián)合艾灸治療組(EM組,n=21)。C組:給予常規(guī)術(shù)后治療;E組:給予常規(guī)術(shù)后治療和核心肌力訓(xùn)練治療;EM組:給予常規(guī)術(shù)后治療、核心肌力訓(xùn)練和局部艾灸治療。分別于治療開始前第1天(1st day,1d)、1周(1st week,1w)和12周(12th week,12w)訓(xùn)練結(jié)束后評價(jià)患者疼痛程度(VAS)、Oswestry功能障礙指數(shù)(ODI)水平、腰背肌伸肌肌力、蜷腹肌力。結(jié)果:治療前,各組VAS、ODI和腰背伸肌肌力、蜷腹肌力水平無明顯差異(P0.05)。①與1d相比,各組在1w時(shí)的VAS均降低(P0.05),12w時(shí)VAS顯著降低(P0.01);與C組相比,在1w、12w時(shí)E組VAS低于C組且差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),EM組VAS低于C組且差異顯著(P0.01);與E組相比,EM組在1w、12w時(shí)VAS更低,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。②與1d相比,各組在1w和12w時(shí)的ODI均降低(P0.05),12w時(shí)降低且差異顯著(P0.01);與C組相比,E組在1w時(shí)ODI較低,但差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),在12w時(shí)更低,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05);與C組相比,EM組在1w時(shí)ODI更低,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),12w時(shí)ODI更低,差異顯著(P0.01);與E組相比,1w時(shí)EM組ODI更低,但兩組結(jié)果無顯著差異(P0.05),在12w時(shí)EM組ODI低于E組且差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。③與1d相比,各組在1w時(shí)的挺腹時(shí)間均提高,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),在12w時(shí)E組、EM組挺腹時(shí)間明顯提高,與治療前差異顯著(P0.01);E、EM組與C組相比,在1w時(shí)挺腹時(shí)間長于C組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),在12w時(shí)E組、EM組挺腹時(shí)間更長,差異顯著(P0.01);E組與EM組相比較,1w、12w時(shí)EM組挺腹時(shí)間更長,但兩組結(jié)果無顯著差異(P0.05)。④與1d相比,各組在1w時(shí)的蜷腹時(shí)間均提高,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),在12w時(shí)E組、EM組顯著提高(P0.01);E組、EM組與C組相比,在1w時(shí)蜷腹時(shí)間均長于C組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05),在12w時(shí)E組、EM組蜷腹時(shí)間顯著長于C組(P0.01);E組與EM組相比較,1w、12w時(shí)EM組蜷腹時(shí)間更長,但兩組結(jié)果無顯著差異(P0.05)。結(jié)論:①單獨(dú)核心肌力訓(xùn)練或者核心肌力訓(xùn)練聯(lián)合艾灸治療均可以促進(jìn)腰椎間盤突出癥患者射頻消融術(shù)后疼痛緩解;②核心肌力訓(xùn)練聯(lián)合艾灸治療促進(jìn)腰椎間盤突出癥患者射頻消融術(shù)后疼痛緩解,效果優(yōu)于單獨(dú)進(jìn)行核心肌力訓(xùn)練治療;③單獨(dú)核心肌力訓(xùn)練或者核心肌力訓(xùn)練聯(lián)合艾灸治療均可以促進(jìn)腰椎間盤突出癥患者射頻消融術(shù)后運(yùn)動功能恢復(fù);④核心肌力訓(xùn)練聯(lián)合艾灸治療與單獨(dú)核心肌力訓(xùn)練相比,12周時(shí)對運(yùn)動功能恢復(fù)的促進(jìn)有明顯效果,但1周時(shí)效果并不優(yōu)于單獨(dú)進(jìn)行核心肌力訓(xùn)練。
[Abstract]:Objective: to observe the clinical effect of core muscle strength training combined with moxibustion in patients with lumbar disc herniation after radiofrequency ablation. Sixty patients with lumbar disc herniation who had been treated with single needle radiofrequency ablation were randomly divided into routine treatment group (. Group C. The core muscle strength training group (group E) and the moxibustion group (group B) were given routine postoperative treatment. Group E: routine postoperative treatment and core muscle strength training; Group EM was treated with routine postoperative treatment, core muscle strength training and local moxibustion treatment. The first day of treatment was 1 day before the beginning of treatment. The pain degree and the Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) were evaluated after 12 weeks and 12 weeks of training. Results: before treatment, there was no significant difference in the muscle strength of VASO ODI and extensor lumbar dorsalis muscle, and the level of cuddle abdominus muscle strength in each group (P0.05.1 vs 1 d). The VAS of each group was significantly lower than that of P0. 05 and P0. 01 at 12 weeks. Compared with group C, the VAS of group E was lower than that of group C at 12 weeks, and the difference was statistically significant. The VAS of group E was lower than that of group C (P 0.05) and the difference was significant (P 0.01). Compared with E group, the VAS of EM group was lower than that of E group at 12 weeks after 1 week, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05) compared with that of 1 day. The ODI of each group decreased at 1 and 12 weeks, and the difference was significant (P 0.01). Compared with group C, the ODI of group E was lower at 1 week, but the difference was not statistically significant (P 0.05), but it was lower at 12 weeks (P 0.05). Compared with group C, the ODI of EM group was lower than that of group C at 1 week, and the ODI was lower at 12 weeks after P0.05, and the difference was significant (P 0.01). The ODI of EM group was lower than that of E group at 1 week, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). At 12 weeks, the ODI of EM group was lower than that of E group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). At 12 weeks, the time of occipitostomy in group E was significantly higher than that before treatment (P 0.01). Compared with group C, the time of occipitostomy in group E was longer than that in group C at 1 week, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), and that in group E was longer than that in group E at 12 weeks, and the difference was significant (P 0.01). Compared with EM group, group E was longer than EM group at 12 weeks, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05.4). Compared with group 1, the time of curling up abdomen in each group was increased at 1 week. The difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). At 12 weeks, E group was significantly higher than that of EM group (P 0.01). Compared with group C, group E had a longer time of curling up abdomen at 1 week than group C, the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05), and at 12 weeks, group E was significantly longer than that of group C. The curling time of EM group was significantly longer than that of group C (P 0.01). Compared with EM group, group E had longer time of curling up abdomen than EM group at 12 weeks after 1 week. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P 0.05). Conclusion either the core muscle strength training alone or the core muscle strength training combined with moxibustion therapy can promote pain relief after radiofrequency ablation in patients with lumbar disc herniation. 2the effect of core muscle strength training combined with moxibustion in promoting pain relief after radiofrequency ablation in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation was better than that of core muscle strength training alone; (3) single core muscle strength training or core muscle strength training combined with moxibustion therapy can promote the recovery of motor function after radiofrequency ablation in patients with lumbar disc herniation. (4) the effect of core muscle strength training combined with moxibustion treatment on the recovery of motor function at 12 weeks was significantly higher than that of single core muscle strength training, but the effect at 1 week was not better than that of core muscle strength training alone.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：R681.53;R493

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏國榮;肌力訓(xùn)練與老年人健康狀態(tài)[J];中國康復(fù)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;1999年05期

2 黃亦兵;;老年人應(yīng)常進(jìn)行肌力訓(xùn)練[J];養(yǎng)生月刊;2006年01期

3 南海鷗;王燕;;核心肌力訓(xùn)練在康復(fù)醫(yī)學(xué)中的意義[J];內(nèi)蒙古醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

4 陳獻(xiàn)南,李毅中;牽引加肌力訓(xùn)練治療老年人腰椎間盤突出癥療效觀察[J];現(xiàn)代康復(fù);2000年11期

5 仇瑤琴,李樹貞,成鵬,趙杰;肌力訓(xùn)練在腰椎間盤突出癥康復(fù)中的作用[J];中國康復(fù)醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2003年04期

6 杜斌;孫魯寧;沈計(jì)榮;;股內(nèi)側(cè)肌斜束肌力訓(xùn)練結(jié)合三色散外敷治療運(yùn)動員髕股外側(cè)高壓綜合征25例[J];深圳中西醫(yī)結(jié)合雜志;2009年06期

7 沈雷;;腰背部肌力訓(xùn)練結(jié)合牽引治療腰椎間盤突出癥[J];中國康復(fù);2013年01期

8 姚保龍;霍文t，

本文編號：1466956