本文關(guān)鍵詞： 檢察機關(guān) 環(huán)境行政公益訴訟 法律監(jiān)督職權(quán) 檢察建議　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在新一輪司法改革進程的大背景下,2015年7月2日,根據(jù)全國人大常委會的授權(quán),最高人民檢察院頒布了《檢察機關(guān)提起環(huán)境公益訴訟試點方案》。隨后,最高人民法院也頒布了《人民法院審理檢察機關(guān)提起環(huán)境公益訴訟的工作實施辦法》與之相配套。該試點方案旨在貫徹并落實十八屆四中全會關(guān)于"探索建立檢察機關(guān)參與公益訴訟制度"的具體要求。隨著試點方案在13個省區(qū)市的逐步展開,不難看出,相較于以往環(huán)境公共利益保護的情況,這次試點改革在主體、方式、手段、程序等諸多方面都有創(chuàng)新之處。隨著改革試點工作的不斷深入,司法實踐中出現(xiàn)了很多在制度設(shè)計之初沒有預(yù)見的問題,比如對于檢察機關(guān)原告資格的認定,訴前程序的具體實施方式,訴訟案源的保障,檢察機關(guān)責(zé)任的承擔(dān),相關(guān)法律制度銜接等問題規(guī)定不夠明確。因此會導(dǎo)致司法實踐缺乏規(guī)范性指引,造成混亂,這就對于總結(jié)現(xiàn)有司法實踐經(jīng)驗,不斷完善環(huán)境行政公益訴訟制度提出了更高需求。本文正是在此大背景下展開檢察機關(guān)環(huán)境行政公益訴訟原告資格研究。本文首先對環(huán)境行政公益訴訟制度進行概述,具體介紹了環(huán)境行政公益訴訟制度的概念和特征及其與一般行政訴訟的區(qū)別;其次,介紹了賦予檢察機關(guān)提起環(huán)境行政公益訴訟原告資格的必要性;再次,就現(xiàn)階段試點過程中檢察機關(guān)作為環(huán)境行政公益訴訟原告起訴的可行性進行分析;最后,就構(gòu)建檢察機關(guān)環(huán)境行政公益訴訟原告資格提出初步設(shè)想。文章按照是什么,為什么,怎么辦的邏輯線索展開,檢察機關(guān)的環(huán)境公益訴訟原告資格是環(huán)境公益訴訟制度的核心內(nèi)容,只有先構(gòu)建起檢察機關(guān)的原告資格,以此為基礎(chǔ),下一步才能在全國范圍內(nèi)開展檢察機關(guān)提起環(huán)境行政公益訴訟的司法實踐活動,因此,本文是一次在制度構(gòu)建方面的有益探究。
[Abstract]:In the background of a new round of judicial reform process, in July 2, 2015, according to the National People's Congress authorized the Supreme People's Procuratorate issued a prosecution "pilot program of environmental public interest litigation. Subsequently, the Supreme People's court has promulgated the" measures for the implementation of the people's court prosecution of environmental public interest litigation filed work > with matching the pilot project aims to carry out and implement the the fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee on explore the specific requirements of establishing the procuratorial organs involved in public interest litigation system ". With the gradual expansion of pilot scheme in 13 provinces, is not difficult to see that, compared to the previous situation of environmental protection of public interests, the pilot reform in the main body, methods, means, procedures etc. have innovation. With the deepening of the reform of the pilot work, in judicial practice there are a lot of system design in the beginning did not see the problem of pre, For example, the plaintiff qualification of the procuratorial organ finds that the embodiment of pretrial proceedings, litigation cases guarantee responsibility of procuratorial organs bear the relevant legal provisions, system interface and other problems are not clear. So the judicial practice will lead to the lack of normative guidance, confusion, it is to summarize existing experience in judicial practice, put forward higher needs to improve the environmental administrative public interest litigation system. This paper is research on the plaintiff qualification of environmental administrative public interest litigation procuratorial organs under this background. This paper first gives an overview of the environmental administrative public interest litigation system, introduces the concept and characteristics of environmental administrative public interest litigation system and its differences with general administrative litigation; secondly, introduces the necessity of give the prosecution of the plaintiff qualification of environmental administrative public interest litigation; thirdly, the present stage in the pilot process of procuratorial organs for the environment Feasibility analysis of the plaintiff in administrative public interest litigation; finally, it constructs the plaintiff qualification of environmental administrative public interest litigation procuratorial organs put forward preliminary ideas. According to what, why, how to do the logical clue, environmental public interest litigation plaintiff qualifications of procuratorial organs is the core content of the environmental public interest litigation system, only to construct the plaintiff qualification the prosecution, on this basis, the next step to carry out the procuratorial organs within the scope of national judicial practice, initiate administrative environmental public interest litigation. Therefore, this paper is a construction in the system of beneficial exploration.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.68;D926.32;D925.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 裘t，

本文編號：1502461