石河谷空氣質(zhì)量定量評價(jià)結(jié)果的比較與分析
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-01-18 09:47
本文關(guān)鍵詞:石河谷空氣質(zhì)量定量評價(jià)結(jié)果的比較與分析? 出處:《寶雞文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版)》2017年02期 論文類型:期刊論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 空氣質(zhì)量評價(jià) 空氣離子濃度 森林環(huán)境
【摘要】:目的比較不同的數(shù)據(jù)處理方法對于石河谷空氣質(zhì)量定量評價(jià)結(jié)果以及森林環(huán)境條件下空氣質(zhì)量等級劃分的影響,為后續(xù)研究提供最佳數(shù)據(jù)處理選擇方案。方法利用Origin9.0軟件,采用整體平均法和降維法分別對石河谷森林環(huán)境空氣離子濃度觀測結(jié)果進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析,并對分析結(jié)果進(jìn)行比較。結(jié)果整體平均法、時(shí)序降維法和降序降維法FCI計(jì)算結(jié)果非常接近,而且空氣質(zhì)量清潔度和空氣質(zhì)量分級結(jié)果是一致的。但是,升序降維法FCI計(jì)算結(jié)果普遍偏低,與其它3種數(shù)據(jù)處理方法相比較,13個(gè)觀測地點(diǎn)的FCI平均值,有12個(gè)與整體平均法、降序降維法和時(shí)序降維法對于空氣質(zhì)量分級結(jié)果是一致的,僅有1個(gè)出現(xiàn)差異,即差異率為7.7%。而且方差分析結(jié)果顯示,4種不同的數(shù)據(jù)處理方法,對于森林環(huán)境下空氣質(zhì)量評價(jià)指標(biāo)FCI值的影響,不存在顯著差異。結(jié)論降序降維法和時(shí)序降維法都可以作為比較理想的森林環(huán)境下空氣正負(fù)離子濃度測定結(jié)果的處理方法,依據(jù)FCI平均值來定量評價(jià)森林環(huán)境的空氣質(zhì)量;而且與整體平均法相比較,因?yàn)樽兞可?更便于進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)分析。
[Abstract]:Objective to compare the effects of different data processing methods on the quantitative evaluation results of air quality and the classification of air quality in forest environment. To provide the best data processing options for further research. Methods Origin9.0 software was used. The global average method and dimensionality reduction method were used to analyze the observed results of air ion concentration in the forest environment of the stone valley, and the results were compared. The results of sequential dimensionality reduction method and reduced order dimension reduction method FCI are very close, and the results of air quality cleanliness are consistent with those of air quality classification. However, the results of ascending descending dimension method FCI are generally low. Compared with the other three data processing methods, 12 of the FCI mean values of the 13 observation sites are consistent with the global average method, the reduced dimension reduction method and the sequential dimensionality reduction method for air quality classification. There was only one difference, that is, the difference rate was 7.7. The results of variance analysis showed that four different data processing methods had an effect on the FCI value of air quality evaluation index in forest environment. Conclusion both sequential and sequential dimensionality reduction methods can be used to deal with the determination results of positive and negative air ion concentration in forest environment. The air quality of forest environment was evaluated quantitatively according to the average value of FCI. And compared with the global average method, because the variables are less, it is more convenient for statistical analysis.
【作者單位】: 寶雞文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)編輯部;寶雞文理學(xué)院地理與環(huán)境學(xué)院;寶雞文理學(xué)院體育系;
【基金】:國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(No.41071359) 陜西省教育廳科研計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(No.JK0546) 陜西省科技統(tǒng)籌創(chuàng)新工程計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(No.KTCL03-17)
【分類號(hào)】:X823
【正文快照】: 陜西省科技統(tǒng)籌創(chuàng)新工程計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(No.KTCL03-17)隨著生態(tài)旅游的興起以及人們保健意識(shí)的增強(qiáng),森林小氣候產(chǎn)生的空氣負(fù)離子所具有的醫(yī)療保健和殺菌功能被愈來愈多的人所認(rèn)識(shí),以林業(yè)和旅游行業(yè)為基礎(chǔ)的森林生態(tài)旅游、森林浴等活動(dòng)相繼展開,有關(guān)空氣負(fù)離子的研究進(jìn)入了一個(gè)新的階
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 ;空氣質(zhì)量提醒器[J];林業(yè)勞動(dòng)安全;2000年03期
2 田雷;空氣質(zhì)量周報(bào)你會(huì)看嗎?[J];沿海環(huán)境;2000年04期
3 白木;中國城市空氣質(zhì)量惡化的趨勢有所減緩[J];電網(wǎng)技術(shù);2001年08期
4 ;空氣質(zhì)量預(yù)報(bào)[J];節(jié)能與環(huán)保;2001年03期
5 孔悅 ,齊求是;中國室內(nèi)空氣質(zhì)量與健康論壇在天津舉行[J];科技潮;2003年09期
6 江峰琴;空氣質(zhì)量預(yù)報(bào)的改進(jìn)[J];環(huán)境監(jiān)測管理與技術(shù);2004年02期
7 吳q氏,
本文編號(hào):1440409
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shengtaihuanjingbaohulunwen/1440409.html
最近更新
教材專著