【摘要】：受特殊的政教形態(tài)之影響,西藏當?shù)厮略褐凶鹳F的坐席有其獨特的權(quán)威認同體系:一方面,在權(quán)威象征上明確區(qū)分了具有政治領(lǐng)域特殊權(quán)威性的寶座和代表宗教領(lǐng)域特殊神圣性的法座;另一方面,有些坐席又同時具有宗教與政治兩種權(quán)威的雙重內(nèi)涵,既具有法座的宗教神圣性,又擁有寶座的政治權(quán)威性。這與安多、康區(qū)等其他藏區(qū)的情況有著值得關(guān)注的差異,因此,圍繞西藏的寶座和法座之權(quán)威認同與形態(tài)類型的辨析比較,正是一種理解西藏政教制度特點的新視角。
[Abstract]:Influenced by the special form of state and religion, the distinguished seats in the local temples in Tibet have their unique authoritative identity system: on the one hand, It clearly distinguishes between the throne with special authority in the political field and the legal seat representing the special sanctity of the religious field in the symbolism of authority. On the other hand, some seats have the dual connotations of both religious and political authority, both religious sanctity of Dharma and political authority of throne. This is different from other Tibetan areas such as Ando, Kang and so on. Therefore, the analysis and comparison of the authority identity and form type around Tibet's throne and Dharma is just a new angle of view to understand the characteristics of Tibet's political and religious system.
【作者單位】： 中國藏學研究中心宗教所;
【分類號】：B948

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 張?zhí)戽i;;達龍寺歷任法座事略[J];西藏民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年03期

2 劉心健;林茂法;;隋造像碑[J];考古;1985年06期

3 楊長纓;王鐵男;;拉薩三大寺都有自己獨一無二的表情和生命[J];環(huán)球人文地理;2012年09期

4 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：2423285