《諸經(jīng)要集》與《法苑珠林》成書時間及相關(guān)問題考辨
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-30 09:34
【摘要】：目前學(xué)界對《諸經(jīng)要集》與《法苑珠林》的成書關(guān)系仍有爭議。本文在分析《諸經(jīng)要集》與《法苑珠林》成書時間的基礎(chǔ)之上,對與之相關(guān)的問題進(jìn)行了考辨。認(rèn)為《諸經(jīng)要集》或成書于《法苑珠林》之后,它是在《法苑珠林》基礎(chǔ)上經(jīng)過摘選、刪節(jié)及少量補(bǔ)充,重新組合而成。道世《諸經(jīng)要集》自序似有后人假托之嫌。
[Abstract]:At present, there is still controversy in academic circles about the relationship between the main Collection of the Classics and the book formation of Fa Yuan Zhu Lin. Based on the analysis of the time of the book formation of the Sutra Collection and the Zhulin in Fayuan, this paper makes a textual research on the related problems. It is considered that after the collection of the Sutra or the book was written in the "Fayuan Pearl Forest", it was reassembled on the basis of the selection, abridgement and a small amount of supplementation on the basis of the "Fayuan Pearl Forest". The collection of the Tao and the Sutra seems to have the suspicion of false sustenance from later generations.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)道教與宗教文化研究所;
【分類號】：B948
，
本文編號：2418000
[Abstract]:At present, there is still controversy in academic circles about the relationship between the main Collection of the Classics and the book formation of Fa Yuan Zhu Lin. Based on the analysis of the time of the book formation of the Sutra Collection and the Zhulin in Fayuan, this paper makes a textual research on the related problems. It is considered that after the collection of the Sutra or the book was written in the "Fayuan Pearl Forest", it was reassembled on the basis of the selection, abridgement and a small amount of supplementation on the basis of the "Fayuan Pearl Forest". The collection of the Tao and the Sutra seems to have the suspicion of false sustenance from later generations.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)道教與宗教文化研究所;
【分類號】：B948
，
本文編號：2418000
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zjlw/2418000.html
