非奴婢而是被收養(yǎng)人:敦煌文書中“恩子”的身份
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-10-17 11:16
【摘要】:敦煌及吐魯番出土文書是研究中國中古西部寺院經(jīng)濟(jì)的最佳文獻(xiàn),其中尤以寺院籍賬最為珍貴。籍賬中記載了寺院各種僧俗勞力的工作任務(wù)和他們從寺院獲得勞動(dòng)所得的糧食分量及其他福利。這些獲得配糧和福利的人口中就包括"恩子",F(xiàn)有的研究認(rèn)為,"恩子"僅僅是人名,而他們的社會(huì)屬性是奴婢。在此,以梳理和詮釋文獻(xiàn)的方法,通過檢查和分析所有含有"恩子"一詞的敦煌文書,發(fā)現(xiàn)其中存在有姓和無姓兩種形式的"恩子",而且沒有明顯證據(jù)表明他們的身份是奴婢。然后再通過仔細(xì)解讀一份《收養(yǎng)契》樣本,最后推論,"恩子"是寺院收養(yǎng)的少年男女,并不屬于奴婢階層。
[Abstract]:The documents unearthed from Dunhuang and Turpan are the best documents to study the economy of monasteries in the western part of China, especially the books of monasteries. The book records the work of the monastic labors and the amount of food and other benefits they receive from the work of the monasteries. These people who receive food and benefits include the "Eunzi". According to existing studies, Eunzi is only a person's name, and their social attribute is a slave. In this paper, by means of combing and interpreting the literature, by examining and analyzing all Dunhuang documents containing the word "Eunzi", it is found that there are two forms of "Eunzi" with or without surname, and there is no obvious evidence that their status is a slave. Then, by carefully interpreting a sample of adoptive deeds, it was concluded that Eunzi was a young man and woman adopted in monasteries and not in the slave class.
【作者單位】: 上海大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:B949;K23
本文編號(hào):2276481
[Abstract]:The documents unearthed from Dunhuang and Turpan are the best documents to study the economy of monasteries in the western part of China, especially the books of monasteries. The book records the work of the monastic labors and the amount of food and other benefits they receive from the work of the monasteries. These people who receive food and benefits include the "Eunzi". According to existing studies, Eunzi is only a person's name, and their social attribute is a slave. In this paper, by means of combing and interpreting the literature, by examining and analyzing all Dunhuang documents containing the word "Eunzi", it is found that there are two forms of "Eunzi" with or without surname, and there is no obvious evidence that their status is a slave. Then, by carefully interpreting a sample of adoptive deeds, it was concluded that Eunzi was a young man and woman adopted in monasteries and not in the slave class.
【作者單位】: 上海大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:B949;K23
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊際平;敦煌文書安環(huán)清賣地契的性質(zhì)和年代——與余也非先生商榷[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1983年04期
2 朱斌權(quán);;從敦煌文書看唐代“中女”問題[J];唐山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期
3 王巖華;;從敦煌文書淺析唐代和離制度[J];科學(xué)之友(B版);2008年12期
4 張澤洪;;敦煌文書中的唐代道經(jīng)[J];敦煌學(xué)輯刊;1993年02期
5 陸離;敦煌文書中的博士與教授[J];敦煌學(xué)輯刊;1999年01期
6 惠媛;;從敦煌文書看唐人婚嫁問題[J];滄桑;2010年04期
7 ;從敦煌文書談晚唐五代的“地子”[J];歷史研究;1996年03期
8 黃正建;敦煌文書中《相書》殘卷與唐代的相面——唐代占卜之二[J];敦煌學(xué)輯刊;1988年Z1期
9 林世田;;《敦煌社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)文獻(xiàn)真跡釋錄》出版[J];文獻(xiàn);1991年01期
10 曹旅寧;從敦煌文書看唐代的嶺南[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);1988年04期
,本文編號(hào):2276481
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zjlw/2276481.html
教材專著