【摘要】：這兩封通信是中國哲學(xué)家趙汀陽和法國人類學(xué)家樂比雄正在合作完成的《關(guān)于一神論》一書的第一回合部分。該書采用跨文化論辯的方式,準備討論一神論傳統(tǒng)所塑造的歐洲思維格式以及此種思想格式對現(xiàn)代性的影響。一神論的思維格式可以說是歐洲最為普遍也最為固定的思想方式,盡管今天基督教在歐洲已經(jīng)逐步式微,但一神論的思維格式卻依然是強勁的主流,主導(dǎo)著西方對事物的理解方式、價值觀和追求目標(biāo)。第一回合只是這個主題討論的開端,主要討論了一些準備性的爭論條件和方法,特別是提出了跨文化對話所遇到的困境,分析了主體間性的局限性以及問題,提出了跨主體性可以成為解決主體間性困難的一種方法。其中,以利瑪竇為例,討論了一神論的追求與多神論的接受方式之間存在的難以克服的鴻溝,顯示了文化對話的一個深刻困難,即,雖然跨主體性可以是一種有效的解決方式,可問題是,在一神論的條件下,卻很難完成跨主體性的建構(gòu),或者說,還很難找到建構(gòu)主體性的有效方式。
[Abstract]:The two letters are the first round of a book about monotheism that Chinese philosopher Zhao Tingyang and French anthropologist Le Bixiong are working on. The book uses a cross-cultural debate to discuss the European thinking format shaped by monotheistic traditions and its impact on modernity. The form of monotheistic thinking can be said to be the most common and fixed way of thinking in Europe. Although Christianity has gradually declined in Europe today, the form of monotheistic thinking is still a strong mainstream. It dominates the way things are understood, values, and goals pursued in the West. The first round is only the beginning of this thematic discussion. It mainly discusses some preparatory arguments and methods, especially the difficulties encountered in cross-cultural dialogue, and analyzes the limitations and problems of intersubjectivity. It is put forward that cross-subjectivity can be a method to solve the problem of inter-subjectivity. Taking Matteo Ricci as an example, the paper discusses the insuperable gap between the pursuit of monotheism and the acceptance of polytheism, which shows a profound difficulty in cultural dialogue, that is, although transsubjectivity can be an effective solution, The problem is that under the condition of monotheism, it is difficult to complete the construction of cross-subjectivity, or to find an effective way to construct subjectivity.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學(xué)院哲學(xué)研究所;歐洲跨文化研究院;中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院哲學(xué)系;
，

本文編號：2178605