本文選題：大理地區(qū) + 本主崇拜�。� 參考：《大理大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：大理是多民族多宗教的地區(qū),本文聚焦大理的民間信仰,即本主崇拜和土主信仰,目前學(xué)術(shù)界普遍認(rèn)為本主崇拜是白族特有的傳統(tǒng)宗教,而土主信仰則是彝族特有的傳統(tǒng)宗教。筆者研究發(fā)現(xiàn)目前學(xué)術(shù)界在研究取向上,白族學(xué)者偏向于研究本主崇拜,而彝族學(xué)者偏向于研究土主信仰,其次筆者在田野調(diào)查中發(fā)現(xiàn),本土學(xué)者在闡釋本主崇拜和土主信仰的過程中與民間信眾的自我表述存在認(rèn)知和解釋上的差異。鑒于此,筆者將以田野點調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)資料,深入研究本主崇拜與土主信仰在歷史流變過程中產(chǎn)生的異同與聯(lián)系,并試析本主崇拜與土主信仰存在異同的原因。本文主要分為五個部分:緒論主要交代筆者選題的背景、意義、創(chuàng)新點以及研究思路等,并評述學(xué)術(shù)界對本主崇拜和土主信仰的研究成果,以及對相關(guān)概念和田野點進(jìn)行介紹。第一章從文獻(xiàn)梳理和傳說故事的分析入手,以時間為線索理清本主崇拜和土主信仰的歷史淵源,一方面分析本主崇拜和土主信仰在歷史進(jìn)程中的聯(lián)系與變遷;另一方面通過它們的傳說故事來看二者在歷史上的聯(lián)系與發(fā)展中的差異。第二章與第三章主要聚焦田野點,分析田野過程中收集到的有關(guān)本主崇拜與土主信仰在信仰空間、神靈體系、信眾儀式等方面的具體內(nèi)容,通過對信仰空間的空間位置和平面布局的現(xiàn)狀描述,并結(jié)合神系、信眾儀式、經(jīng)典禁忌三方面的內(nèi)容,揭示當(dāng)下本主崇拜與土主信仰的具體現(xiàn)狀。第四章主要分析本主崇拜和土主信仰的社會功能,以此來看民族和區(qū)域文化對本主崇拜和土主信仰產(chǎn)生的影響,并揭示本主崇拜與土主信仰在社會功能方面存在的異同。結(jié)語部分主要總結(jié)本文的主要觀點和內(nèi)容,通過對民族文化精英寫文化過程地討論,來反觀文化再造過程中民族文化精英的文化自覺性,以及民間信眾自我表述的矛盾沖突性。并指出本文存在的不足之處。
[Abstract]:Dali is a region with many nationalities and many religions. This paper focuses on the folk belief of Dali, that is, the worship of the native owner and the belief of the local master. At present, the academic circles generally think that the worship of the native master is the traditional religion of Bai nationality, while the belief of the native master is the unique traditional religion of the Yi nationality. The author found that in the current academic research orientation, Bai scholars tend to study the worship of the subject, while Yi scholars tend to study the belief of the local master. Secondly, the author finds out in the field investigation. There are cognitive and explanatory differences between native scholars and folk believers in the process of explaining their worship and belief. In view of this, the author will study deeply the similarities, differences and connections between the worship of the owner and the belief of the local master in the course of historical evolution, based on the field survey data and the relevant literature. And analyzes the reason why there are similarities and differences between the worship of the owner and the belief of the native master. This paper is divided into five parts: the introduction mainly describes the background, significance, innovation and research ideas of the author, and comments on the academic research achievements on the worship of the master and the belief of the local master, as well as the introduction of related concepts and field points. The first chapter starts with the literature combing and the analysis of the legendary story, taking time as the clue to clarify the historical origin of the worship of the owner and the belief of the master of the land, on the one hand, it analyzes the connection and changes between the worship of the owner and the belief of the master of the land in the historical process; On the other hand, through their legendary stories to see the historical relationship and development of the difference between the two. The second and third chapters mainly focus on the field points, and analyze the concrete contents of the local worship and the local master belief in the belief space, the spiritual system, the religious rites and so on, which are collected in the field process. By describing the present situation of the spatial position and plane layout of the belief space and combining with the three aspects of the divine system, the ritual of believers and the classical taboos, this paper reveals the present concrete situation of the worship of the original master and the belief of the local master. The fourth chapter mainly analyzes the social function of the worship of the owner and the belief of the master of the land, so as to see the influence of the national and regional culture on the worship of the owner and the belief of the master of the land, and to reveal the similarities and differences between the worship of the owner and the belief of the master of the earth in the aspect of social function. The conclusion part mainly summarizes the main viewpoints and contents of this paper, through the discussion of the cultural process of the national cultural elite, to reflect the cultural consciousness of the national cultural elite in the process of cultural reconstruction, as well as the contradiction and conflict of the folk believers' self-expression. The shortcomings of this paper are pointed out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大理大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B933

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張麗娟;;巍山彝族土主崇拜現(xiàn)象解析[J];南方論刊;2012年02期

2 蔡紅燕;;宗教儀式中的村落精英——巍山啄木郎村彝族宗教精英現(xiàn)實功能及文化生境考察[J];保山學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年03期

3 程朝珠;羅海燕;;白族本主崇拜的育人功能[J];吉林省教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(學(xué)科版);2011年03期

4 李金發(fā);蔡華;;傳統(tǒng)的復(fù)興與文化重構(gòu)——對巍山土主文化復(fù)興的人類學(xué)分析[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;2011年01期

5 董建中;;白族本主名稱考[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社科版);2010年10期

6 那培思;趙玉中;蔣曉軍;;對云南大理白族的表述與自我表述的再思考[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社科版);2008年08期

7 羅勇;;巍山多元宗教信仰的融合與和諧關(guān)系[J];大理文化;2008年01期

8 金少萍;;宗教文化中的社會性別建構(gòu)——白族女性與本主崇拜[J];中央民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年01期

9 張汝梅;周毅敏;;淺談大理白族本主崇拜的文化內(nèi)涵[J];中國科技信息;2007年04期

10 楊甫旺;;彝族土主崇拜研究[J];云南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊立紅;大理挖色白族本主文化傳承的社會心理基礎(chǔ)研究[D];西南大學(xué);2013年

2 陳繼揚(yáng);云南大理白族本主崇拜的教育功能研究[D];西南大學(xué);2007年

3 金東朝;中國云南大理白族傳統(tǒng)宗教研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2003年

4 蔡華;道教與彝族傳統(tǒng)文化研究[D];四川大學(xué);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 謝梅琴;本主信仰與村落民俗生活[D];云南大學(xué);2015年

2 成琳嵐;二郎神原型的歷史探析[D];云南大學(xué);2013年

3 張玉;白族女性的本主信仰研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2012年

4 饒峻姝;大理白族本主廟的裝飾藝術(shù)研究[D];云南大學(xué);2010年

5 曹志杰;云南巍山彝族祭祖儀式的考察與研究[D];云南民族大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2079863