本文選題：報(bào)應(yīng)觀 + 南北朝隋唐�。� 參考：《華東師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：善惡報(bào)應(yīng)觀念由來(lái)已久,直至科學(xué)日益發(fā)達(dá)的今天,大多數(shù)人們?nèi)匀辉谟幸饣驘o(wú)意中將善惡自有報(bào)作為為人處世的信念和準(zhǔn)則。中國(guó)本土報(bào)應(yīng)觀主要有兩種,傳統(tǒng)儒家報(bào)應(yīng)觀和道教“承負(fù)說(shuō)”,而佛教?hào)|傳所帶來(lái)的佛教報(bào)應(yīng)觀念,在南北朝隋唐時(shí)期日漸流行,在沖擊與豐富中國(guó)本土報(bào)應(yīng)觀的同時(shí),佛教報(bào)應(yīng)觀也做了一些適應(yīng)中土人文的調(diào)整,最終形成了中國(guó)佛教報(bào)應(yīng)觀。廣泛流傳于社會(huì)上的報(bào)應(yīng)觀念,與以上種種報(bào)應(yīng)觀都有著千絲萬(wàn)縷的聯(lián)系,因而在佛教日漸興盛的南北朝隋唐時(shí)代不可避免地發(fā)生了某些變化。 本文以富含南北朝隋唐時(shí)代的報(bào)應(yīng)故事的社會(huì)史料《太平廣記》為切入點(diǎn),力圖展現(xiàn)那一時(shí)代的報(bào)應(yīng)觀念及其演變趨勢(shì)。 本文主要包括以下內(nèi)容： 第一章：緒論。主要?dú)w納學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)于報(bào)應(yīng)觀念的研究成果和不足,指出本文撰寫(xiě)的主要目標(biāo),即探討南北朝至隋唐時(shí)期報(bào)應(yīng)觀念的主要內(nèi)容及其變化。 第二章：統(tǒng)計(jì)。統(tǒng)計(jì)《太平廣記》報(bào)應(yīng)故事及其所引文獻(xiàn)資料的書(shū)名、作者、成書(shū)年代和現(xiàn)存情況,為第三章和第四章分析演變趨勢(shì)提供量化數(shù)據(jù)。 第三章：以報(bào)應(yīng)方式為切入點(diǎn),考察南北朝隋唐時(shí)期報(bào)應(yīng)觀的內(nèi)容及其演變。以《廣記》報(bào)應(yīng)故事為主要分析對(duì)象,注重探討報(bào)應(yīng)方式及其演變趨勢(shì)。報(bào)應(yīng)方式分為加報(bào)主力和報(bào)應(yīng)時(shí)空(其中又包含報(bào)應(yīng)對(duì)象)兩方面,隋唐較之南北朝,一方面將法律增加為加報(bào)主力之一,另一方面將報(bào)應(yīng)時(shí)空無(wú)限制延伸,以及將報(bào)應(yīng)對(duì)象聚焦于行為者本人。 第四章：通過(guò)考察業(yè)因、業(yè)報(bào)與報(bào)應(yīng)、消報(bào)的內(nèi)容及演變情況,闡述南北朝報(bào)應(yīng)觀的主要內(nèi)容及演變趨勢(shì)。以《廣記》報(bào)應(yīng)故事為主要分析對(duì)象,注重挖掘“業(yè)”的內(nèi)容及其背后暗含的時(shí)代善惡觀念,即人們漸漸將佛教戒律化和儒家倫理化作為善惡評(píng)判的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。同時(shí),對(duì)于消報(bào)方式也做了一定的研究,認(rèn)為消報(bào)觀念主要受佛教影響。 第五章：結(jié)語(yǔ)。歸納文章報(bào)應(yīng)觀念的主要內(nèi)容及演變趨勢(shì),本文報(bào)應(yīng)觀念主要涉及報(bào)應(yīng)方式、業(yè)因內(nèi)容以及消報(bào)方式,通過(guò)對(duì)這三類(lèi)的分析比較,得出南北朝隋唐時(shí)期報(bào)應(yīng)觀念有著明顯的佛教化趨向。
[Abstract]:The concept of retribution for good and evil has a long history, until today, when science is increasingly developed, most people still intentionally or unintentionally take the good and evil as the faith and criterion of dealing with the world. There are mainly two kinds of local retribution in China, the traditional Confucian retribution and Taoism "bearing the burden", and the Buddhist retribution concept brought about by Buddhism spreading to the east became more and more popular in the Sui and Tang dynasties of the Southern and Northern dynasties. At the same time, it impacted and enriched the local retribution view in China. Buddhist retribution also made some adjustments adapted to Chinese culture, and finally formed the Chinese Buddhist retribution. The concept of retribution, which is widely spread in the society, is inextricably linked with the above ideas of retribution, which inevitably changed during the Sui and Tang dynasties, when Buddhism flourished. Based on the social historical data of the retribution stories of the Sui and Tang dynasties in the Southern and Northern dynasties, the article tries to show the concept of retribution and its evolution trend in that period. This paper mainly includes the following contents: Chapter one: introduction. The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the main contents and changes of the concept of retribution from the Southern and Northern dynasties to the Sui and Tang dynasties. Chapter two: statistics. The title, author, age of the book and the present situation of the retribution story and its cited documents provide quantitative data for the third and fourth chapters to analyze the trend of evolution. Chapter three: from the perspective of retribution, the content and evolution of retribution in Sui and Tang dynasties are investigated. Taking the retribution story of Guang Ji as the main object of analysis, the paper probes into the retribution mode and its evolution trend. The way of retribution is divided into two aspects: the main force of retribution and the time and space of retribution (which also includes the object of retribution). Compared with the Southern and Northern dynasties, Sui and Tang dynasties increased the law to one of the main forces of the retribution, and on the other hand extended the retribution time and space without restriction. And focusing the retribution object on the actor himself. Chapter four: through the investigation of the cause of business, the content and evolution of the retribution, the paper expounds the main content and the evolution trend of the retribution in the Southern and Northern dynasties. Taking the retribution story of Guang Ji as the main object of analysis, the author pays attention to excavating the content of "karma" and the concept of good and evil implied behind it, that is, people gradually regard Buddhist precepts and Confucian ethics as the criteria for judging good and evil. At the same time, the way of eliminating newspaper is also studied, and it is believed that the idea of eliminating newspaper is mainly influenced by Buddhism. Chapter five: conclusion. The paper summarizes the main content and evolution trend of the concept of retribution in this paper, which mainly involves the retribution mode, the content of cause and the way of eliminating the newspaper, through the analysis and comparison of these three kinds of ideas. It is concluded that the retribution concept in the Sui and Tang dynasties of the Southern and Northern dynasties has an obvious trend of Buddhism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K239;K24;B949

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭淑新;;慧遠(yuǎn)的“因果報(bào)應(yīng)”論新詮[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

2 張樹(shù)卿;張洋;;儒、釋、道的報(bào)應(yīng)觀比較研究[J];白城師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

3 牛延鋒;;解讀方立天先生的佛教文化內(nèi)涵——以因果報(bào)應(yīng)思想為例[J];保定師范專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

4 童光俠;《佛說(shuō)盂蘭盆經(jīng)》與《目連救母變文》[J];敦煌學(xué)輯刊;1990年01期

5 孟強(qiáng);武氏祠天帝降罰圖淺析──兼談漢代善惡報(bào)應(yīng)思想[J];東南文化;2001年05期

6 李懿;;從《太平廣記》之仙境描寫(xiě)看道教的世俗化趨勢(shì)[J];大眾文藝(理論);2008年10期

7 王麗;;道德的感召與神鬼的威嚇——“三言”中的倫理觀和果報(bào)觀[J];大眾文藝;2011年08期

8 羅顥;;傳統(tǒng)報(bào)應(yīng)說(shuō)與佛教因果報(bào)應(yīng)理論比觀[J];法音;1990年09期

9 黃云鶴;唐代舉子游丐之風(fēng)——《太平廣記》所見(jiàn)唐代舉子生活態(tài)之一[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;2004年01期

10 李小榮;試論敦煌變文業(yè)報(bào)輪回之佛教思想的來(lái)源及表現(xiàn)[J];楚雄師專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 焦杰;戴綠紅;雷巧玲;;從《太平廣記》中的仙女下凡故事看唐代的道教觀念[A];唐史論叢（第九輯）[C];2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 曾禮軍;《太平廣記》研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 鄭宗言;《太平經(jīng)》中的承負(fù)思想[D];安徽大學(xué);2007年

2 熊紅艷;承負(fù)說(shuō)與因果報(bào)應(yīng)論的比較分析[D];西南大學(xué);2008年

3 陳慧宇;敦煌變文中的佛教“果報(bào)觀念”[D];湘潭大學(xué);2008年

4 劉暢;《太平廣記》報(bào)應(yīng)故事研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1966992