本文選題：天主教改革 + 特蘭托大公會(huì)議　； 參考：《首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：1537年問世的《教會(huì)改革建議書》是16世紀(jì)天主教改革運(yùn)動(dòng)中的一份重要文獻(xiàn)。學(xué)界常常自覺或不自覺地受"目的論"支配,將此文獻(xiàn)放在"特蘭托改革"或"特蘭托時(shí)代"的框架內(nèi)來解讀�！督ㄗh書》的重要性看似得到認(rèn)可,實(shí)則在本質(zhì)上被認(rèn)作是"前特蘭托時(shí)代"的產(chǎn)物,因而其真正的歷史意義反倒隱而不彰。學(xué)者們通常認(rèn)為,1563年閉幕的特蘭托大公會(huì)議制定了較為完整的改革藍(lán)圖,進(jìn)而促使天主教會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)變心態(tài),加緊社會(huì)控制與社會(huì)規(guī)訓(xùn),強(qiáng)調(diào)以主教作為改革驅(qū)動(dòng)力,限制和打擊平信徒的宗教復(fù)興運(yùn)動(dòng)。這種看法需要加以修正。重新解讀《建議書》,可發(fā)現(xiàn):天主教會(huì)遭遇的雙重危機(jī),即體制危機(jī)以及教會(huì)官方應(yīng)對(duì)體制危機(jī)的過程中自身所蘊(yùn)含的觀念危機(jī),早在16世紀(jì)30年代就已成型;天主教會(huì)逐漸不再容忍以往多元取徑的信仰生態(tài)之做法也早已在此時(shí)出現(xiàn)。"特蘭托改革"只是《建議書》的延續(xù),而不是天主教改革運(yùn)動(dòng)的轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn)。此轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn)應(yīng)是《建議書》。進(jìn)而言之,需要重新考量16世紀(jì)30年代的天主教變化,并重新思考16世紀(jì)天主教改革運(yùn)動(dòng)的連續(xù)性。
[Abstract]:The Church Reform recommendation, published in 1537, was an important document in the 16 th century Catholic Reformation Movement. Scholars are often consciously or unconsciously dominated by "teleology" and interpret this document within the framework of "Tranto Reform" or "Tranto era." the importance of the "recommendation" seems to be recognized. In essence, it is regarded as the product of the "pre-Tranto era", so its true historical significance is hidden. Scholars generally believe that the Grand Duke of Tranto, which ended in 1563, drew up a more complete blueprint for reform, which in turn prompted the Catholic Church to change its mentality, tighten social control and social discipline, and emphasize the importance of bishops as the driving force for reform. To restrict and combat the religious revival movement of ordinary believers. This view needs to be revised. Rereading the "proposal", we can find that the double crisis encountered by the Catholic Church, that is, the crisis of the system and the crisis of the concept contained in the process of the church's official coping with the crisis of the system, had already taken shape as early as 1630s; The Catholic Church has gradually ceased to tolerate the ecological practices of pluralism. " The Tranto Reformation was a continuation of the recommendations, not a turning point in the Catholic reform movement. This turning point should be the proposal. Furthermore, it is necessary to reconsider the changes in Catholicism in the 1630s and the continuity of the Catholic Reformation in the 16th century.
【作者單位】： 中山大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“卡洛·博羅梅奧的米蘭大主教區(qū)改革與近代早期意大利社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型研究(1565-1610)”(17BSS045)的階段性研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：B976.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 以勒;;初期教會(huì)的大公會(huì)議[J];天風(fēng);2007年20期

2 以勒;;中世紀(jì)時(shí)期的大公會(huì)議[J];天風(fēng);2008年06期

3 黃小芬;;天主教第二屆梵蒂岡大公會(huì)議及其歷史意義[J];中國(guó)天主教;2012年06期

4 Hilmar Pabel;馬志紅;;世界歷史上最大的公會(huì)議——紀(jì)念梵蒂岡第二次大公會(huì)議[J];中國(guó)天主教;2013年02期

5 龐世宏;;公會(huì)議是怎樣來的[J];信鴿;1964年01期

6 Richard Mc Brien ,胡歐;“梵二大公會(huì)議”的教會(huì)學(xué)[J];中國(guó)天主教;1996年06期

7 李世文;;第二屆梵蒂岡公會(huì)議在干什么?[J];信鴿;1964年02期

8 姚順;“梵二”后教會(huì)禮儀的特點(diǎn)[J];中國(guó)天主教;1994年04期

9 Richar Mc Brien ,胡歐;幾位對(duì)“梵二公會(huì)議”有影響的教會(huì)學(xué)家[J];中國(guó)天主教;1996年06期

10 傅方濟(jì);大公會(huì)議對(duì)教會(huì)信仰的貢獻(xiàn)[J];中國(guó)天主教;1997年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳婷婷;中世紀(jì)晚期的公會(huì)議理論[D];天津師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1938309