本文選題：源信 + 知禮�。� 參考：《宗教學研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：本文首先對《四明尊者教行錄》所載北宋初期日本天臺宗僧源信"二十七問"的求決對象與"再答日本國十問"的作者歸屬進行了考察,澄清了相關史實,糾正了學界的通常說法。其次對中日兩國基于各自立場對源信求決動機的不同記載與論說進行了梳理與評判,指出源信求決是繼承自日本天臺宗開祖最澄以來入唐求決的傳統(tǒng),也有為自宗在日本佛教宗派斗爭中的發(fā)展謀求資源,以期保持自宗地位與利益的考量。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author of the "27 question" in the early Northern Song Dynasty and the author's ownership of "answering the Ten questions of Japan" in the early Northern Song Dynasty are investigated, and the relevant historical facts are clarified. It corrects the usual theory of academic circles. Secondly, the author sorts out and judges the different records and theories of the motive of the source letter resolution in China and Japan based on their respective positions, and points out that the source letter resolution is inherited from the tradition of the Tang Dynasty, which has been the most obvious since the emperor of Tiantai sect opened the ancestor of Japan. There are also resources for the development of self-Buddhism in Japanese Buddhist struggle, in order to maintain the status and interests of self-Buddhism.
【作者單位】： 寧波大學人文與傳媒學院;
【基金】：浙江省社科規(guī)劃課題“四明知禮與中日佛學交流”(16NDJC108YB) 寧波大學校級研究院項目“四明知禮與中日佛學交流”(ZYJYG1502) 寧波大學人才引進項目“中日佛教交流史視野下的浙東佛教”階段性成果
【分類號】：B949
，

本文編號：1842269