發(fā)布時間：2018-03-14 00:19

  本文選題：宗教理解　切入點：終極關(guān)切　出處：《中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院》2000年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 論文主題：以宗教本質(zhì)及其理解方法的討論為基礎(chǔ)，對基督教和道家思想的 價值觀進行比較和分析。 一、基督教思想和道家思想是中西方文化的基礎(chǔ)與核心。把兩者聯(lián)系起來進行比較具 有重要的理論意義和現(xiàn)實價值。不僅有助于彰顯中西方文化的差異，而且有助于理解各自 的特點。 二、由于基督教文化和道家文化的異質(zhì)性，必須找到一種共同的或公共的視域，才可 能對之進行有效比較。蒂利希的終極關(guān)切概念，揭示了人類生存中普遍存在的價值問題， 因而成為我們研究的出發(fā)點。即比較它們對人生價值和意義的不同理解與建構(gòu)。 三、通過對宗教本質(zhì)及其理解方法的討論，在汲取海德格爾、保羅·蒂利希、約翰·希 克的人的研究成果基礎(chǔ)上，把宗教理解為：從終極實在觀念背景出發(fā)建構(gòu)人類終極價值的 努力，并把宗教的各種終極實在觀念，理解為對宇宙終極實在的不同回應(yīng)。 四、上帝和道觀念產(chǎn)生的歷史及文化基礎(chǔ)分析。上帝和道觀念作為萬物本源的邏輯特 性及其不同特點。上帝作為造物主以言創(chuàng)造世界，使世界“使有”；而道作為萬物本源以“道 法自然”讓萬物“自化”。兩種不同的本源論所決定的中西方在宇宙觀、自然觀、及思維方 式上的深刻差異。 五、上帝和道觀念相對于人的關(guān)系和內(nèi)含。上帝觀念從舊約向新約的發(fā)展，道在人的 理想生命狀態(tài)中的存在與顯現(xiàn)。上帝觀念表明：基督教文化關(guān)注的是耶穌基督道成肉身所 揭示出的人的生命的倫理精神價值。道觀念表明：道家文化關(guān)注的是以自然生命的健康、 和諧為基礎(chǔ)的人的生命本身的價值�；浇掏ㄟ^信仰與上帝溝通，道家通過生命操作與道 融為一體。與信仰相關(guān)的是上帝的道成肉身之啟示，與生命操作相關(guān)的是專氣致柔、心齋、 坐忘和內(nèi)丹術(shù)。 六、基督教終極關(guān)切價值生成的思想脈絡(luò)：猶太教的基礎(chǔ)，神人關(guān)系的契約性、精神 性和倫理性，罪性與拯救�；浇膛c猶太教的差別，基督教教義形成的歷史機緣�；缴� 圣之愛的內(nèi)含分析：超越性、精神性、價值性、現(xiàn)實性及歷史目的論。愛作為終極價值的 合理性與可能性�；浇倘松鷥r值最終定位于基督的神性位格基礎(chǔ)之上。 七、道家終極關(guān)切價值生成的思想脈絡(luò)：“道法自然”不僅承認生命自身固有的價值， 而且暗含倫理價值的自足自律性。養(yǎng)生對道家思想的多方面意義：體道、合道、生命的藝 術(shù)、道德自性的源泉，從自然生命向社會人生轉(zhuǎn)換和連接的橋梁。道家生命價值體驗的分 析及其合理性評價。樂感與反對感官放縱。道家的社會情懷。道家的人生價值最終定位于 自然生命本身之中，當下生命即意義和價值。 八、宗教終極關(guān)切與倫理道德的關(guān)系。倫理道德并不等于宗教的終極關(guān)切，但卻是宗 教價值的主要內(nèi)容之一。 九、基督教文化與道家文化的超越性問題�；浇桃陨系蹎⑹緸榛A(chǔ)的超越性和道家 以內(nèi)在于生命之中的道為基礎(chǔ)的超越性之分析和比較�；浇膛c道家終極價值的共通性， 即最終都落實在生命上，以普遍生命為目的和價值。
[Abstract]:Subject: on the basis of the discussion of the nature of religion and its understanding method, the thought of Christianity and Taoism
Values are compared and analyzed.
First, the Christian thought and Taoist thought are the foundation and core of the Chinese and Western cultures.
It has important theoretical and practical values. It not only helps to reveal the differences between Chinese and Western cultures, but also helps to understand each other.
Characteristics.
Two, because of the heterogeneity of Christian culture and Taoist culture, it is necessary to find a common or public view.
It can be effectively compared. The concept of the ultimate concern of tyre reveals the common value problems in human existence.
Therefore, it becomes the starting point of our research, that is, to compare their different understanding and construction of the value and meaning of life.
Three, through the discussion of the nature of religion and its understanding, Heidegger, Paul Tillich, John F
On the basis of the research results of the people, religion is understood as the construction of the ultimate value of human being from the background of the ultimate reality.
Work hard and understand the ultimate reality of religion as a different response to the ultimate reality of the universe.
Four, analysis of the historical and cultural basis of the concept of God and Tao. The logic of God and Tao as the logic of the origin of all things
Nature and its different characteristics. God creates the world as the creator and makes the world "make"; and the Tao is the source of all things as the source of all things.
"Law nature" makes all things "self". The two different origins of the source theory in the western view of the universe, the view of nature, and the thinking side
The profound difference in the style.
Five, the relationship between God and the idea of Tao is relative to man. The idea of God's idea from the old testament to the New Testament is the man.
The existence and appearance of the ideal life state. The idea of God shows that Christian culture is concerned with the body of Jesus Christ.
The moral values of the human life are revealed. The Taoist concept shows that the Taoist culture focuses on the health of natural life,
The value of the life itself that is based on harmony. Christianity is communicated with God through faith, and the Taoist works through the way of life.
Com. And faith related is the incarnation of God's revelation, and life related to the operation of the gas is designed by soft, fast,
Oblivion and alchemy.
Six, the ideological context of the ultimate concern of the value generation of Christianity: the foundation of Judaism, the contractual nature of the relationship between God and man, and the spirit
Sex and ethics, guilt and salvation. The difference between Christianity and Judaism, the historical chance of the formation of Christian doctrine. The Christian God
The inner analysis of the holy love: Transcendence, spirit, value, reality and historical teleology. Love is the ultimate value.
Rationality and possibility. The value of Christian life is finally located on the basis of the divine nature of Christ.
Seven, the ultimate concern of Taoism thought of value creation: "imitation of nature" is not only the inherent value of life,
And the self-sufficiency and self-discipline implied in the ethical value. The multifaceted significance of health keeping to Taoist thought: the art of body, harmony, and life
The source of the moral self, the bridge from the natural life to the social life and the connection of the social life.
Analysis and evaluation on the rationality of musicality and opposition. Sensory indulgence. Taoist social feelings. Taoist life value finally located in
In the natural life itself, the present life is the meaning and the value.
Eight, the relationship between religious ultimate concern and ethics. Ethics does not mean the ultimate concern of religion, but it is a religion.
One of the main contents of teaching value.
Nine, the transcendence of Christian culture and Taoist culture. Christianity's transcendence and Taoism on the basis of God's Revelation
The analysis and comparison of transcendence based on the Tao within life. The commonality of the ultimate value of Christianity and Taoism,
In the end they are all carried out in life, with universal life as its purpose and value.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2000
【分類號】：B97

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高宇軒;近代早期西方社會救濟制度的基督教淵源[D];東北師范大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔡瀟瀅;基督教對大學(xué)生的精神支持狀況研究[D];天津師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1608777