本文關鍵詞： 覺囊派 他空 自空 大中觀見　出處：《西藏大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：論文《覺囊派“他空大中觀見”研究》基于比教學的研究方法主要論述了古今藏族賢者們對覺囊派“他空大中觀見”的辯駁與覺囊派自身對其所持的不同觀點進行駁斥。從古到今辯駁覺囊派“他空大中觀見”最常見的依據(jù)有三:一是“他空大中觀見”無傳承系統(tǒng);二是“他空大中觀見”實屬外道非正見;三是“他空大中觀見”非正統(tǒng)中觀派。論文針對以上三點分三個章節(jié)進行研究。第一章論述覺囊派“他空大中觀見”是否有無傳承來源的觀點,并澄清該無傳承之說源于至尊仁達瓦。至尊仁達瓦云:“自古以來在印尼藏三地沒有出現(xiàn)過承認此觀點的佛教徒……”。依據(jù)此說法,后來的藏族賢者們以為史無前例的“他空見”純屬至尊玉牟彌覺多杰自創(chuàng),認為覺囊派“他空大中觀見”沒有正統(tǒng)的傳承來源,對此筆者根據(jù)覺囊派歷代傳承上師的顯密宗典籍進行分析了覺囊派的“他空大中觀見”是否真屬于無傳承的“中觀見”。第二章主要探討覺囊派“他空大中觀見”是否屬邪見作為命題,文章引用了認為“他空見”是邪見之說的代表人物,至尊仁達瓦和土觀洛桑曲杰尼瑪?shù)恼摀?jù)分析了覺囊派的“他空見”這一論點,致使,闡明了覺囊派“他空大中觀見”雖與外道有相似之處,但非外道所屬的見解。第三章辨析覺囊派“他空大中觀見”是否屬于中觀派。首先,比較分析覺囊派“他空大中觀見”是否與佛教四派中的有部、經(jīng)部和維識派的觀點相吻合;其次,使用覺囊派不以“自空見”為終極觀點的原因,闡釋了“他空大中觀見”;最后,論證覺囊派“他空大中觀見”不僅屬于中觀見,而且屬于“大中觀見”,但是,并非屬于中觀自續(xù)派和中觀應成派任何一類。
[Abstract]:The Research on "Tsac School" "he empty and Big View" is a research method based on comparison teaching. This paper mainly discusses the arguments of ancient and modern Tibetan sages on "he empty and large view" and the different views of Chueqiao school itself on it. From ancient times to the present, there are three most common bases for refuting the theory of "his empty view of large view": first, "his empty view of large view" has no system of inheritance; Second, "he sees in the big view" actually belongs to the outside way wrong view; The first chapter discusses whether there are any sources of inheritance or not. And clarify that the doctrine of no inheritance originates from the supreme Jung Jen Dawa Wan: "there have been no Buddhists who have recognized this view in three places of Indonesia and Tibet since ancient times."... according to this statement, Later, the Tibetan sages thought that the unprecedented "his empty view" was purely the creation of the supreme jade, Mimi Chueh-tuo, and thought that the Chueh-sac faction had no orthodox source of inheritance. In this paper, the author analyzes whether "he emptiness view" really belongs to the "middle view" of Chueqiao school, according to the classical works of the leading master of Chueh-sac School. Chapter two mainly discusses the Chueh-sac School's "he empty Grand Viewpoint". Whether it is an evil opinion as a proposition, The article cites the argument that "his empty opinion" is the representative of evil opinion, the argument of the supreme Jundawa and the Tuguan Lobsang Qujnima analyzes the argument of "he empty opinion" of Chuesao School, so that, This paper expounds the views of the Chueh-pang School "he emptiness and macroscopical view", although it is similar to the outer Tao, but it is not belong to the outer Tao. Chapter three differentiates whether "he empty and large view" belongs to the middle school. First of all, This paper makes a comparative analysis on whether the "he empty and big view" of Chuesao School is consistent with the views of the four Buddhist schools of Buddhism, and secondly, the reason why it does not regard "self-view" as the ultimate point of view in the use of Chuesao School. At last, it is demonstrated that Chueqiao school "he empty and large view" not only belongs to the middle view, but also belongs to the "big and middle view", but it does not belong to any kind of the middle view self-continuation school and the middle view should form the school.
【學位授予單位】：西藏大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B948

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 許得存;;覺囊派他空思想淺論[J];西藏研究;1993年01期

2 仁可;;試述覺囊派教義思想的融通性[J];集寧師專學報;2009年02期

3 陳興華;藏傳佛教覺囊派簡介[J];西北民族研究;1992年01期

4 西尼崔臣;;略述藏傳佛教覺囊派[J];西藏研究;2011年06期

5 佘萬治;劉俊哲;;藏傳佛教覺囊派哲學思想初探[J];西藏研究;1992年02期

6 翟存明;簡論覺囊派的佛教思想[J];青海民族學院學報;2001年01期

7 喬根鎖;藏傳佛教覺囊派的哲學思想[J];西藏民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年04期

8 何杰峰;;中觀與覺囊派判教[J];康定民族師范高等�？茖W校學報;2007年03期

9 桑吉扎西;;藏傳佛教覺囊派唐卡藝術首次在京展出[J];法音;2012年01期

10 莊春輝;;藏傳佛教覺囊派唐卡畫一組[J];西藏藝術研究;2012年04期

相關重要報紙文章 前4條

1 清揚 李鑌;覺囊濟世 樂住人間[N];人民政協(xié)報;2003年

2 黃雷;壤塘——藏傳佛教覺囊文化中心[N];中國民族報;2010年

3 本報記者 邵杰;藝術，，其根本目的不是為了創(chuàng)意[N];中國藝術報;2014年

4 本報記者 王洪林;文化點燃新希望[N];阿壩日報;2008年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 次旦加布;覺囊派“他空大中觀見”研究[D];西藏大學;2017年

2 盧婷;藏傳佛教覺囊派中壤塘確爾基寺歲末驅(qū)魔法會音樂研究[D];中央民族大學;2012年

本文編號：1514990