【摘要】：《史記索隱》是史記三家注中引書(shū)最豐者,保存了大量唐代以前的文獻(xiàn)。前賢程金造認(rèn)為《史記索隱》雖引征豐富,然規(guī)律未嚴(yán),以致讀者核檢原書(shū)多有不便。文章通過(guò)對(duì)《史記索隱》所引四百多種書(shū)籍耙梳比對(duì),整理出其具體引書(shū)體式四種十一小類(lèi),考得《索隱》引書(shū)規(guī)律四種:儒家經(jīng)典及其他經(jīng)典書(shū)籍之本書(shū)皆以書(shū)名、篇名出,不列撰者;傳注之書(shū)多以撰者出,或附以書(shū)名、篇名;撰者無(wú)可考或無(wú)定論者,皆以書(shū)名出;凡不列書(shū)名、撰者,未言明引文出處者,皆以意取,而不直接引用原文。并據(jù)此為《索隱》述補(bǔ)引書(shū)凡例。
[Abstract]:Suoyin is the most abundant of the three notes to Shi Ji, which preserves a large number of documents before the Tang Dynasty. Cheng Jinzao, a former sage, believes that although the quotation of Historical Records is rich, the law is not strict, so that it is inconvenient for readers to check the original book. Through the comparison of more than 400 kinds of books cited in Historical Records of Suoyin, this paper sorts out four kinds of 11 subcategories of specific citation styles, and obtains four kinds of quotation laws: the books of Confucian classics and other classical books are all written under the title of the book, the title of the book is not listed as the author, most of the books on the note are written by the author, or appended with the title of the book, and the author is unexaminable or indeterminable, all of them are named after the book title, and the book title of the Confucian classics and other classical books is given by the title of the book, and the title of the book. Where the title of the book is not listed, the author, and those who do not state the source of the citation, take it by intention, rather than quote the original text directly. According to this, it is an example of the reference book of "Suoyin".
【作者單位】： 鄭州師范學(xué)院文學(xué)院;
【基金】：河南省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)規(guī)劃項(xiàng)目“司馬貞《史記索隱》研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):2017BLS015)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K204

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 蘇們;;司馬貞《史記索隱》“王師叔”正訛[J];圖書(shū)館理論與實(shí)踐;2011年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2504830