《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》高誘注研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-21 13:33
【摘要】：《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》一書(shū)是戰(zhàn)國(guó)時(shí)代的一部史料匯編,主要記載了列國(guó)的歷史事實(shí)和故事傳說(shuō),既有史料價(jià)值,又有文學(xué)價(jià)值,值得探研。綜觀《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》的研究史,雖非興旺,卻也不絕如縷,尤其二十世紀(jì)以來(lái),學(xué)者從文獻(xiàn)研究、文學(xué)成就研究、思想價(jià)值研究和影響研究諸多方面對(duì)其進(jìn)行深入挖掘。據(jù)粗略統(tǒng)計(jì),此階段論文不下兩百篇,專(zhuān)著亦有幾十種。盡管前人的研究取得了很大成績(jī),但因?qū)W術(shù)思想的制約與研究側(cè)重點(diǎn)的不同,有關(guān)《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》的研究依然存在很大空間,譬如對(duì)其注文的研究。 東漢高誘是目前所知為《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》作注的第一人,從此掀起了后人研讀的熱潮,可惜高注如今已是殘?jiān)珨啾谥病Ｇ宕詠?lái),研究高誘《淮南子注》與《呂氏春秋注》的學(xué)者絡(luò)繹不絕,他們?cè)谛＠砀咦⑽墨I(xiàn)、考證高注得失方面均取得了很大成功,但對(duì)于高誘《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策注》的研究,則顯得力度不夠,目前沒(méi)有專(zhuān)門(mén)性的論著問(wèn)世。本文在總結(jié)前人研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,將對(duì)高誘《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策注》作一個(gè)全面的、系統(tǒng)的梳理。本文共分為五個(gè)部分： 第一部分緒論,簡(jiǎn)述了《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》的概況和高誘《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策注》的演變。另外,說(shuō)明《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》高注的研究現(xiàn)狀和研究意義。 第二部分,通過(guò)高誘自己所作的兩篇序文——《淮南鴻烈解序》和《呂氏春秋序》,以窺其生平經(jīng)歷。抓住漢代學(xué)者傳經(jīng)注重師法這一特點(diǎn),以明高誘的學(xué)術(shù)淵源。 第三部分,從訓(xùn)詁學(xué)、考據(jù)學(xué)的角度出發(fā),以?xún)H存的十卷高注為主,從訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容、訓(xùn)詁術(shù)語(yǔ)和訓(xùn)詁方法三個(gè)方面展開(kāi)論述,從而體現(xiàn)高誘嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)認(rèn)真、追求實(shí)證的治學(xué)風(fēng)范。 第四部分,從思想史的角度出發(fā),并結(jié)合高誘的另外兩部注書(shū)——《淮南子注》和《呂氏春秋注》,分析《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》高注的思想性,主要包括兩個(gè)方面：一是高注具有強(qiáng)烈的宗經(jīng)崇儒意識(shí)。作為一位具有憂患意識(shí)的經(jīng)學(xué)家,高誘有意把大量富有儒家色彩的思想言論植入《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》的注解中,而且他疏解字詞文意多以儒家經(jīng)傳為準(zhǔn)的,用以維護(hù)和尊崇儒學(xué),由此表現(xiàn)出強(qiáng)烈的宗經(jīng)崇儒意識(shí)。二是高誘的道家觀念。漢魏之際,重視和研讀道家典籍,汲取其精髓入援經(jīng)學(xué)。高誘在注釋中有時(shí)會(huì)穿插他對(duì)道家思想的概括,有時(shí)會(huì)反復(fù)提及道家所崇尚的主張,由此可窺高誘的道家觀念。 第五部分,通過(guò)分析高注對(duì)后世注本的影響,來(lái)體現(xiàn)高誘《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策注》之于高誘、之于整個(gè)《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》注解系統(tǒng)以及之于文獻(xiàn)學(xué)、訓(xùn)詁學(xué)等方面的重要價(jià)值和地位。當(dāng)然,筆者也會(huì)客觀地看待高注確實(shí)存在的一些瑕疵,及其思想中某些不能與時(shí)俱進(jìn)的思想。
[Abstract]:The warring States Policy is a compilation of historical materials in the warring States period, which mainly records the historical facts and story legends of various countries. It has both historical data value and literary value, which is worth exploring and studying. Although the research history of warring States Policy is not prosperous, it is inextricably linked, especially since the 20th century, scholars have deeply excavated it from many aspects: literature research, literary achievement research, ideological value research and influence research. According to rough statistics, there are no fewer than 200 papers and dozens of monographs at this stage. Although great achievements have been made in previous studies, due to the constraints of academic thought and the different emphasis of research, there is still a lot of space for the study of warring States Policy, such as the study of its notes. Gao Yu in the Eastern Han Dynasty was the first person known to have made a note on the warring States Policy, which has since set off an upsurge in the study of future generations. Unfortunately, Gao Zhu is now a broken wall. Since the Qing Dynasty, there has been a steady stream of scholars studying Gao Yan's "Huainan Zi Note" and "Lu's Spring and Autumn Note". They have achieved great success in studying the literature of high attention and textual research on the gains and losses of high attention, but the study of Gao Yan's "warring States period Strategy Note" is not strong enough, and there is no special work at present. On the basis of summing up the previous research results, this paper will make a comprehensive and systematic combing of Gao Yan's warring States Strategy Notes. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction, which briefly describes the general situation of the warring States Policy and the evolution of the warring States period Strategy Note. In addition, the research status and significance of high note in warring States Policy are explained. In the second part, through the two preface articles of Huainan Honglie solution and Lu's Spring and Autumn preface, we can get a glimpse of his life experience. Grasp the Han Dynasty scholars to pay attention to the characteristics of teaching and law, in order to Ming Gao induced academic origin. The third part, from the point of view of exegetics and textual criticism, mainly focuses on the only ten volumes of high notes, and discusses them from three aspects: exegetical content, exegetical terms and exegetical methods, so as to reflect the rigorous and serious nature of Gao Yan and the pursuit of empirical academic style. In the fourth part, from the point of view of the history of thought, combined with the other two notes, Huainan Zi Note and Lu's Spring and Autumn Note, this paper analyzes the ideological nature of the high note in the warring States Policy, which mainly includes two aspects: one is that Gao Gui has a strong consciousness of advocating Confucianism in the Sutra. As a scholar with a sense of suffering, Gao Yu intended to insert a large number of Confucian thoughts and remarks into the notes of the warring States Policy, and he unexplained the meaning of the words and words, mostly based on the Confucian scriptures, in order to maintain and respect Confucianism, thus showing a strong consciousness of advocating Confucianism. The second is the Taoist concept of high inducement. During the Han and Wei dynasties, we attached importance to and studied Taoist classics and absorbed their essence to help the study of classics. Gao Yu sometimes interspersed his summary of Taoist thought in his notes, and sometimes repeatedly mentioned the Taoist ideas advocated by Taoist schools, so as to see Gao Yan's Taoist ideas. The fifth part, by analyzing the influence of high note on the notes of later generations, reflects the important value and position of high inducement to Gao Yu, to the whole warring States Policy annotation system, as well as to philology, exegetics and so on. Of course, the author will also objectively look at some of the defects that high note does exist, and some of the thoughts that can not keep pace with the times.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K231.04
本文編號(hào)：2504115
[Abstract]:The warring States Policy is a compilation of historical materials in the warring States period, which mainly records the historical facts and story legends of various countries. It has both historical data value and literary value, which is worth exploring and studying. Although the research history of warring States Policy is not prosperous, it is inextricably linked, especially since the 20th century, scholars have deeply excavated it from many aspects: literature research, literary achievement research, ideological value research and influence research. According to rough statistics, there are no fewer than 200 papers and dozens of monographs at this stage. Although great achievements have been made in previous studies, due to the constraints of academic thought and the different emphasis of research, there is still a lot of space for the study of warring States Policy, such as the study of its notes. Gao Yu in the Eastern Han Dynasty was the first person known to have made a note on the warring States Policy, which has since set off an upsurge in the study of future generations. Unfortunately, Gao Zhu is now a broken wall. Since the Qing Dynasty, there has been a steady stream of scholars studying Gao Yan's "Huainan Zi Note" and "Lu's Spring and Autumn Note". They have achieved great success in studying the literature of high attention and textual research on the gains and losses of high attention, but the study of Gao Yan's "warring States period Strategy Note" is not strong enough, and there is no special work at present. On the basis of summing up the previous research results, this paper will make a comprehensive and systematic combing of Gao Yan's warring States Strategy Notes. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is the introduction, which briefly describes the general situation of the warring States Policy and the evolution of the warring States period Strategy Note. In addition, the research status and significance of high note in warring States Policy are explained. In the second part, through the two preface articles of Huainan Honglie solution and Lu's Spring and Autumn preface, we can get a glimpse of his life experience. Grasp the Han Dynasty scholars to pay attention to the characteristics of teaching and law, in order to Ming Gao induced academic origin. The third part, from the point of view of exegetics and textual criticism, mainly focuses on the only ten volumes of high notes, and discusses them from three aspects: exegetical content, exegetical terms and exegetical methods, so as to reflect the rigorous and serious nature of Gao Yan and the pursuit of empirical academic style. In the fourth part, from the point of view of the history of thought, combined with the other two notes, Huainan Zi Note and Lu's Spring and Autumn Note, this paper analyzes the ideological nature of the high note in the warring States Policy, which mainly includes two aspects: one is that Gao Gui has a strong consciousness of advocating Confucianism in the Sutra. As a scholar with a sense of suffering, Gao Yu intended to insert a large number of Confucian thoughts and remarks into the notes of the warring States Policy, and he unexplained the meaning of the words and words, mostly based on the Confucian scriptures, in order to maintain and respect Confucianism, thus showing a strong consciousness of advocating Confucianism. The second is the Taoist concept of high inducement. During the Han and Wei dynasties, we attached importance to and studied Taoist classics and absorbed their essence to help the study of classics. Gao Yu sometimes interspersed his summary of Taoist thought in his notes, and sometimes repeatedly mentioned the Taoist ideas advocated by Taoist schools, so as to see Gao Yan's Taoist ideas. The fifth part, by analyzing the influence of high note on the notes of later generations, reflects the important value and position of high inducement to Gao Yu, to the whole warring States Policy annotation system, as well as to philology, exegetics and so on. Of course, the author will also objectively look at some of the defects that high note does exist, and some of the thoughts that can not keep pace with the times.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K231.04
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 周俊勛;從高誘注看東漢北方代詞系統(tǒng)的調(diào)整[J];阿壩師范高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2000年01期
2 丁原明;;高誘思想述要[J];東岳論叢;1988年03期
3 馮玉濤;古注“讀與某同”作用類(lèi)析[J];古漢語(yǔ)研究;2000年01期
4 李秀華;;《淮南子》高誘注佚文輯考[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;2010年02期
5 張彥修;《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》主題思想試探[J];管子學(xué)刊;1999年02期
6 吳先文;《淮南子》高誘注之注音研究[J];合肥學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年04期
7 王軍;從《淮南子》注談高誘的自然觀[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期
8 孫良明;高誘注中的語(yǔ)義結(jié)構(gòu)和語(yǔ)法結(jié)構(gòu)描寫(xiě)[J];山東師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1988年01期
9 王守謙;略談《戰(zhàn)國(guó)策》[J];松遼學(xué)刊(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1991年04期
10 唐莉;《淮南子》高誘注獻(xiàn)疑[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1993年02期
，本文編號(hào)：2504115
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2504115.html
教材專(zhuān)著
