【摘要】：新文化運(yùn)動(dòng)時(shí)期,中國(guó)知識(shí)界出現(xiàn)了"東西文化論戰(zhàn)"和"科玄論戰(zhàn)"兩場(chǎng)大規(guī)模論戰(zhàn)。論戰(zhàn)主體基于對(duì)中國(guó)未來(lái)出路的探索,針對(duì)究竟是取法西方還是依據(jù)東方、究竟是奉行科技理性還是生命哲學(xué)而展開(kāi)。兩場(chǎng)論戰(zhàn)的主題雖然不同,但它們共同折射出現(xiàn)代中國(guó)知識(shí)界在思考現(xiàn)代性問(wèn)題時(shí)呈現(xiàn)出的集體性焦慮。晚清以來(lái),中國(guó)知識(shí)分子遭遇了現(xiàn)代性的宿命,但因思想主體的現(xiàn)代性體驗(yàn)有所游移,關(guān)于現(xiàn)代性的參照系和方式一直存有爭(zhēng)議。這體現(xiàn)出現(xiàn)代中國(guó)知識(shí)界建構(gòu)中國(guó)在現(xiàn)代性體系中位置的強(qiáng)烈愿望,以及愿望達(dá)成之前所必須面對(duì)的身份認(rèn)同危機(jī)。
[Abstract]:During the New Culture Movement, there appeared two large-scale debates in Chinese intellectual circles: East-West Cultural debate and "Science-metaphysical debate." The main body of the debate is based on the exploration of the future way out of China, aiming at whether to follow the west or the east, whether to pursue the scientific and technological rationality or the philosophy of life. Although the themes of the two debates are different, they jointly reflect the collective anxiety of modern Chinese intellectuals when they think about modernity. Since the late Qing Dynasty, Chinese intellectuals have suffered the fate of modernity, but because of the modernity experience of the subject, there has always been controversy about the frame of reference and the way of modernity. This reflects the strong desire of modern Chinese intellectuals to construct China's position in the modern system and the identity crisis that must be faced before the realization of the desire.
【作者單位】： 內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)文學(xué)與新聞傳播學(xué)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K203
，

本文編號(hào)：2379084