【摘要】：自唐中期以降至宋朝,中原王朝經(jīng)營(yíng)東西陸路交通已由此前近千年的主動(dòng)經(jīng)營(yíng),轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)楸粍?dòng)性的經(jīng)營(yíng)。不論是經(jīng)營(yíng)對(duì)象還是對(duì)交通路線的經(jīng)營(yíng),北宋都不能實(shí)施有效的行政管理和武力保障。換言之,均不在版圖疆域之內(nèi)。北宋經(jīng)營(yíng)東西陸路交通分為宋太宗和宋神宗兩個(gè)階段,宋太宗因與遼朝兩次大戰(zhàn)失敗,其經(jīng)營(yíng)東西陸路交通的政策曇花一現(xiàn)。宋神宗至宋徽宗時(shí)期,持續(xù)近六十年積極經(jīng)營(yíng)東西陸路交通,基本保證了青唐路交通的暢通。這兩個(gè)階段的經(jīng)營(yíng)均屬北宋國(guó)防經(jīng)略遼朝和西夏戰(zhàn)略之一環(huán)。北宋前期與河西諸政權(quán)、龜茲、回鶻有密切的交往關(guān)系,后一階段則是為了遮斷西夏右臂對(duì)河湟吐蕃展開軍事占領(lǐng),與于闐來(lái)往密切。宋朝與漢唐經(jīng)營(yíng)東西交通最大的不同點(diǎn)在于,漢唐是政治與經(jīng)貿(mào)并重,因?yàn)闈h唐的對(duì)外貿(mào)易是以陸路交通為主,黃河流域的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展是其依托,故而海上交通為輔,中唐以后經(jīng)濟(jì)重心南移的趨勢(shì)加快,經(jīng)五代十國(guó),及北宋建立,對(duì)外貿(mào)易已逐漸轉(zhuǎn)到以海上絲路為主,陸路為輔的新格局。
[Abstract]:From the middle of Tang Dynasty to the Song Dynasty, the Central Plains Dynasty managed the east and west land transportation from the initiative of nearly a thousand years ago, and changed into a passive operation. The Northern Song Dynasty could not carry out effective administration and force protection, whether it was the object of operation or the management of transportation route. In other words, they are not part of the territory. The North Song Dynasty managed the east and west land transportation into two stages: song Taizong and Song Shenzong. Due to the failure of the two great wars between the Song Dynasty and the Liao Dynasty, the policy of managing the east and west land transportation was ephemeral. During the period from Song Shenzong to Huizong, it lasted for nearly 60 years and managed the east and west land transportation, which basically ensured the smooth traffic of Qingtang Road. The management of these two stages is one of the strategies of the Northern Song Dynasty, the Liao Dynasty and the Western Xia Dynasty. In the early Northern Song Dynasty, there were close contacts with the governments of Hexi, Qiuci and Uighur, and the latter stage was to break the military occupation of Hehuang and Tubo by the right arm of the Western Xia Dynasty, and had close contact with Yutian. The biggest difference between the Song Dynasty and the Han Dynasty and the Tang Dynasty in managing east-west traffic is that the Han and Tang dynasties put equal emphasis on politics and trade, because the foreign trade of the Han and Tang dynasties was dominated by land transportation, and the economic development of the Yellow River Basin was based on it, so maritime transportation was complementary. After the middle Tang Dynasty, the economic center of gravity moved southward. After five dynasties and ten countries, and the establishment of the Northern Song Dynasty, the foreign trade gradually shifted to the new pattern of taking the sea silk road as the main body and land as the supplement.
【作者單位】： 首都師范大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：K244

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 武玉環(huán);程嘉靜;;遼代對(duì)草原絲綢之路的控制與經(jīng)營(yíng)[J];求索;2014年07期

2 榮新江;;《清明上河圖》中唯一的胡人[J];紫禁城;2013年04期

【二級(jí)參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 王大方;;論草原絲綢之路[J];鄂爾多斯文化;2006年02期

2 楊富學(xué);陳愛峰;;遼朝與大食帝國(guó)關(guān)系考論[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

3 張郁;;草原絲綢之路契丹印跡[J];內(nèi)蒙古金融研究;2003年S3期

4 樊文禮;遼代的豐州、天德軍和西南面招討司[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1993年03期

5 何天明;遼代西南面招討司探討[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(文史哲版);1990年06期

6 楊蕤;歷史上的夏遼疆界考[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(漢文版);2003年06期

7 康鵬;;遼朝西北路招討司再探——兼談遼朝西北路的防御體系[J];宋史研究論叢;2010年00期

8 長(zhǎng)澤和俊;陳俊謀;;遼對(duì)西北路的經(jīng)營(yíng)(下)[J];民族譯叢;1984年05期

9 馬文寬;法庫(kù)葉茂臺(tái)早期遼墓出土的伊斯蘭玻璃調(diào)味方盤[J];中國(guó)歷史文物;2002年03期

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王子云;;新疆的石刻藝術(shù)[J];文物參考資料;1956年08期

2 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 蓋山林;;從考古發(fā)現(xiàn)看內(nèi)蒙古地區(qū)在元代東西交通中的地位[A];中外關(guān)系史論叢（第一輯）[C];1981年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 錢振為;淺議東西交通[N];人民政協(xié)報(bào);2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王蕾;漢唐河隴關(guān)津與東西交通[D];蘭州大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2345413