【摘要】：孟旦在其中國古典哲學(xué)研究中,創(chuàng)造性地運(yùn)用了“圖像”和“叢生”這兩個(gè)概念。基于這兩個(gè)概念的解釋方案,不但適于展示中國哲學(xué)之特質(zhì),而且較之當(dāng)代西方哲學(xué)中諸如隱喻、詩化哲學(xué)、圖像修辭、異延等眾說紛紜的新嘗試更為簡樸,在哲學(xué)上具有進(jìn)一步開發(fā)和提煉的前景。實(shí)際上,“圖像”和“叢生”概念所揭示或反映的,不是傳統(tǒng)西方哲學(xué)意義上的實(shí)體或本體,而是“間性(interality)”,亦即非實(shí)體的現(xiàn)實(shí)。盡管在早期文獻(xiàn)里找不到專論間或間性的例證,似乎也沒有將間性抽象為哲學(xué)范疇的明確努力,但是“間”字在古典文獻(xiàn)中的使用卻絕不罕見。如何認(rèn)識(shí)和對(duì)待現(xiàn)前的間性狀態(tài),如何遵循和建設(shè)理想的間性條件,實(shí)為古典中國哲學(xué)的核心關(guān)注。正是蘊(yùn)含在“圖像”及“叢生”概念中的間性(論)視角,使得中國先哲發(fā)展出了一種不同于西方的哲學(xué)路徑與話語系統(tǒng)。
[Abstract]:Meng Dan creatively applied the concepts of "image" and "cluster" in his study of Chinese classical philosophy. The interpretation scheme based on these two concepts is not only suitable for displaying the characteristics of Chinese philosophy, but also more simple than the new attempts of contemporary western philosophy such as metaphor, poetic philosophy, image rhetoric, different extension and so on. It has the prospect of further development and refinement in philosophy. In fact, the concepts of "image" and "cluster" reveal or reflect not the entity or ontology in the sense of traditional western philosophy, but the "inter-entity (interality)", that is, the reality of non-entity. Although there are no examples of intermonism or interiority in the early literature and no explicit efforts to abstract intersubjectivity into philosophical categories, the use of the word "interspace" in classical literature is by no means rare. It is the core concern of classical Chinese philosophy that how to understand and deal with the present state of intersex and how to follow and construct the ideal condition of intersex. It is the interfacial perspective contained in the concepts of "image" and "cluster" that makes Chinese sages develop a philosophical path and discourse system different from that of the West.
，

本文編號(hào)：2168494