本文選題：四庫(kù)總目學(xué) + 史研究　； 參考：《北京師范大學(xué)》2004年博士論文

【摘要】： “四庫(kù)總目學(xué)”(簡(jiǎn)稱“總目學(xué)”)是對(duì)《四庫(kù)全書總目》(簡(jiǎn)稱《總目》)進(jìn)行研究的學(xué)問�！八膸�(kù)總目學(xué)史”(簡(jiǎn)稱“總目學(xué)史”)是對(duì)“總目學(xué)”的發(fā)展歷程、研究成果、研究方法、研究思想等進(jìn)行的歸納總結(jié)和規(guī)律性探討的學(xué)問。 “總目學(xué)史”研究對(duì)于總結(jié)兩百多年來(lái)《總目》研究的基本成就,深入研討“總目學(xué)”各類代表性成果,揭示其學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值,歸納其研究方法,具有重要的理論價(jià)值和實(shí)踐意義。本文在導(dǎo)言以下,從六個(gè)方面對(duì)“總目學(xué)史”進(jìn)行考察和論述。 第一章論述《總目》的編撰及其流傳。從政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化以及清朝對(duì)思想統(tǒng)一的要求分析《總目》的產(chǎn)生背景。其次考察《總目》編撰分工及編撰過程,討論分纂提要、書前提要與《總目》提要之間的關(guān)系、內(nèi)容差異及差異原因。最后總結(jié)《總目》的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值和意義。 第二章研究各類對(duì)《總目》進(jìn)行補(bǔ)撰的書目。首先指出《總目》編撰因文網(wǎng)與禁書毀書、館臣學(xué)術(shù)眼光的不足及疏怠、清廷的民族政策等原因,造成《總目》缺漏甚多,引起各種補(bǔ)撰書目的產(chǎn)生。本章從禁書書目和未收書目?jī)蓚�(gè)方面考察了補(bǔ)撰書目的發(fā)展源流和基本成就。重點(diǎn)評(píng)述了姚覲元的《禁書總目四種》、孫殿起的《清代禁書知見錄》、阮元的《四庫(kù)未收書目提要》三種代表性書目的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值,指出補(bǔ)撰書目在揭示我國(guó)古籍發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,反映康乾社會(huì)政治面貌、文化政策及在書目編撰手法等方面的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值。 第三章討論續(xù)編《總目》的學(xué)術(shù)成就�！犊偰俊分�,因各類學(xué)術(shù)著述不斷涌現(xiàn),因此產(chǎn)生《鄭堂讀書記》、《續(xù)修四庫(kù)全書總目提要》為代表的一批續(xù)編書目。本章對(duì)以上兩部代表性書目進(jìn)行研究,指出《鄭堂讀書記》在內(nèi)容、體例、考證方法等方面續(xù)接了《總目》,并有所發(fā)展;在增錄圖書方面作出了貢獻(xiàn)�？疾臁独m(xù)修提要》的編撰過程,指出其以續(xù)編為主,大大擴(kuò)充了圖書的著錄范圍,續(xù)寫了乾隆朝及其以后中華文化發(fā)展史。 第四章論述了對(duì)《總目》進(jìn)行辨證補(bǔ)訂的研究成果。指出《總目》因�？辈痪�、選本不良、館臣粗疏及囿于門戶之見等原因造成的種種錯(cuò)誤�？疾烀駠�(guó)期間完成的余嘉錫《四庫(kù)提要辨證》、胡玉縉《四庫(kù)全書總目提要補(bǔ)正》兩部代表性學(xué)術(shù)著作對(duì)《總目》糾謬補(bǔ)正的貢獻(xiàn)及學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值。比較二書的特點(diǎn),指出余書以考證功力見長(zhǎng),胡書以補(bǔ)正總數(shù)取勝,二書各有側(cè)重,有互補(bǔ)作用。此外,總結(jié)自民國(guó)到20世紀(jì)末,海峽兩岸對(duì)《總目》糾謬補(bǔ)正的學(xué)術(shù)成果,分析其辨證方法及學(xué)術(shù)意義。 第五章從文獻(xiàn)學(xué)史和學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)史的角度歸納“總目學(xué)”研究的成果,論述了以往“總目學(xué)”論著從文獻(xiàn)學(xué)史的角度對(duì)《總目》在目錄版本學(xué)、考據(jù)學(xué)上的價(jià)值進(jìn)行總結(jié),從學(xué)術(shù)批評(píng)的角度對(duì)《總目》的經(jīng)學(xué)觀、史學(xué)觀、文學(xué)觀等進(jìn)行研究的成果,尤其突出評(píng)論了陳垣、周積明、黃愛平、季野等人的貢獻(xiàn)。 第六章總結(jié)有關(guān)學(xué)者對(duì)《總目》思想文化的研究,指出這種研究把目錄學(xué)、思想史和文化史相結(jié)合的特色,強(qiáng)調(diào)其開辟“總目學(xué)”研究新領(lǐng)域與新思路的意義。 本文結(jié)語(yǔ)從縱向概述了“總目學(xué)史”四個(gè)歷史階段的發(fā)展進(jìn)程,歸納了“總目學(xué)”研究的流派及方法,并對(duì)“總目學(xué)”發(fā)展提出了前瞻性設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:The study of the "four libraries" ("total catalogue") is a study of the study of the total catalogue of the four library books. The history of the four libraries ("the history of the general catalogue") is a summary of the development process of the "general catalogue", the research results, the research methods and the research ideas.
The study of "history of the general catalogue" is of great theoretical and practical significance for the summary of the basic achievements of the "general catalogue" for more than two hundred years. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the representative achievements of the "general catalogue", to reveal its academic value and to sum up its research methods.
The first chapter discusses the compilation and spread of the general catalogue. From the political, economic, cultural, and the Qing Dynasty's requirements for the unification of thought, the background of the "general catalogue" is analyzed. Secondly, it examines the process of the compilation and compilation of the general catalogue, and discusses the relationship between the compilation of the summary, the relationship between the summary of the book and the general catalogue, the difference in content and the reasons for the difference. Finally, the summary of the general catalogue is summarized. Academic value and significance.
The second chapter studies the bibliography of all kinds of supplement to the general catalogue. First, it points out that the "general catalogue", the compilation of the network and the forbidden books, the lack of academic vision, the national policy of the courtiers, and so on, cause a lot of missing and missing books, which cause the creation of various supplement bibliographies. This chapter reviews and writes from the two aspects of the bibliography and the uncollected bibliography. The origin and basic achievements of the bibliography are discussed, and the academic value of Yao Jinyuan's four kinds of forbidden books, Sun Dianqi's "forbidden books in the Qing Dynasty", Ruan Yuan's "four libraries uncollected bibliographies", and the academic value of the three representative bibliographies are discussed. The academic value of the compilation techniques.
The third chapter discusses the academic achievement of the sequel to the general catalogue. After the general catalogue, there is a continuous emergence of various academic writings, resulting in a series of renewal bibliographies represented by "Zheng Tang reading Secretary" and "renewal of the summary of the total catalogue of four libraries." this chapter studies the above two representative bibliographies, and points out that "Zheng Tang reading Secretary >" in content, style, textual research methods and so on. Continue to follow the "general catalogue" and develop; make a contribution to the book of the added book. Study the compilation process of the renewal of the summary, and point out that it has extended the book's Cataloguing scope greatly, and has renewed the history of the Chinese culture in the Qianlong Dynasty and the future of the Chinese culture.
The fourth chapter expounds the research results of the dialectical supplement to the general catalogue. It points out that the mistakes caused by the unproofreading, the bad selection, the careless of the library and the limited view of the door are caused by the general catalogue, and the analysis of the syndrome differentiation of Yu Jia Xi's "four library summary" completed during the period of the Republic of China, and the two representative academic works of the general catalogue of the four library books of Hu Yujin. To compare the contribution and academic value of correction and correction, compare the characteristics of the two books, point out that Yu Shu has a long history of textual research, Hu Book wins the total number of complements, each of the two books has its own emphasis and complementarity. In addition, it summarizes the academic achievements of the two sides of the two sides of the Republic to the end of the twentieth Century, and analyzes the dialectical methods and academic significance on the two sides of the two sides of the Taiwan Straits.
The fifth chapter sums up the achievements of the study of the "general catalogue" from the perspective of the history of philology and the history of academic criticism, and discusses the summary of the value of the general catalogue of the previous "general catalogue" from the perspective of the history of philology, and the value of the study on the catalogue edition and the textual research, and the study view, the historical view, the literary view and so on from the angle of academic criticism. The achievements, especially the contribution of Chen Yuan, Zhou Ji Ming, Huang Aiping, Ji ye, et al.
The sixth chapter summarizes the scholars' research on the thought and culture of the general catalogue, and points out that this kind of research combines the characteristics of bibliography, ideological history and cultural history, and emphasizes the significance of opening up new fields and new ideas in the study of "general catalogue".
The conclusion of this paper is a longitudinal overview of the development process of the four historical stages of the "history of the general catalogue", and sums up the schools and methods of the study of the "general catalogue", and puts forward a forward-looking vision for the development of the "general catalogue".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號(hào)】：K206

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李勇進(jìn);史部雜史類研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2011年

2 王娟;《四庫(kù)全書總目》與文淵閣《四庫(kù)全書》書前提要比勘研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2099457