本文選題：西漢 + 漢武帝　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版)》2016年03期

【摘要】：在西漢時期所謂巫蠱之禍這一事變當(dāng)中,漢武帝太子劉據(jù),因巫蠱事發(fā)而不得不發(fā)兵反叛,最終兵敗自殺。后世學(xué)者,論及此事,多謂此事純粹出于江充陷害,太子據(jù)并未行用巫蠱。前此我撰著《制造漢武帝》,提到太子據(jù)應(yīng)是確實施行了這一巫術(shù),很多讀者以為拙說不能成立。本文就是在此前研究的基礎(chǔ)上,進(jìn)一步詳細(xì)闡述我對這一問題的思索,以供認(rèn)真關(guān)心這一事件的學(xué)者或歷史愛好者參考。文章首先指出,在西漢時期,只要不以天子為祝詛對象,巫蠱并不違法;《漢書》客觀記載了從太子據(jù)宮中掘得桐木偶人這一基本事實;所謂江充之奸,不過充分利用了漢武帝因求長生而無法容忍他人對其施行巫蠱的心理,從而達(dá)到清除太子據(jù)的目的,而漢武帝后來對這一事件的"感悟",不過是意識到他自己流露出來的更換太子的意圖,是促成巫蠱之變的重要原因。然而,不僅漢武帝,甚至直至漢宣帝時期的西漢朝廷,一直認(rèn)定太子據(jù)犯有對天子行用巫蠱的罪過。
[Abstract]:In the Western Han Dynasty, the so-called witchcraft disaster, Emperor Liu, because of witchcraft and rebellion, eventually defeated suicide. Later scholars, when it came to this matter, said it was purely due to Jiangchong frame, the prince did not use witchcraft. Earlier, I wrote making Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, referring to the fact that the Prince actually carried out this witchcraft. Many readers thought that this theory could not be justified. On the basis of previous research, this paper further elaborates my thoughts on this issue for the reference of scholars or history lovers who are seriously concerned about this issue. The article first points out that in the Western Han Dynasty, witchcraft was not illegal as long as the son of Heaven was not regarded as the object of the curse; the book of the Han Dynasty objectively recorded the basic fact that the Paulownia puppet had been excavated from the prince according to the palace. However, he made full use of the psychology that Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty could not tolerate other people's witchcraft on him because he wanted to live for a long time, so as to achieve the purpose of purging the princes. However, Emperor Wu's later "perception" of the incident was only to realize that his own intention to change the prince was an important reason for the change of witchcraft. However, not only the Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, even the Western Han Dynasty court until the Han Dynasty Xuandi period, always believed that the Prince was guilty of the crime of using witchcraft against the emperor.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系;
【基金】：國家哲學(xué)社會基金重大項目“中國歷史農(nóng)業(yè)地理研究與地圖繪制”(13&ZD082)
【分類號】：K234.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 馮成麟;漢語被動式的問題[J];人文雜志;1957年01期

2 趙光清;;江充巫蠱事件略述[J];科學(xué)與無神論;2010年01期

3 秦進(jìn)才;;《漢書·江充傳》“充出逢館陶長公主”考[J];邯鄲學(xué)院學(xué)報;2011年03期

4 于春櫸;;囹圄中成長的中興帝王[J];章回小說;2013年10期

5 龐壯國;太子之死[J];章回小說;2001年01期

6 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 周天;皇后、太子的冤案[N];檢察日報;2003年

2 胡忠良;長安城里的巫蹤魅影[N];中國檔案報;2003年

3 李慧秋;漢武帝的巫蠱之案[N];人民法院報;2005年

，

本文編號：2075540