《禮緯》思想研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-06-14 06:55
本文選題:禮緯 + 西王母; 參考:《四川師范大學》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】:讖緯盛行于東漢,是漢代學術的重要組成部分。漢代統(tǒng)治者大力發(fā)展儒學,儒學以禮學為根基,漢代對禮學的重視表現在經學與政權的各個方面!抖Y緯》作為漢代禮學與讖緯的發(fā)揚,不僅體現了儒家禮學的傳統(tǒng),同時對漢代經學、宗教、政治產生了深遠的影響,對于《禮緯》思想內涵的研究可以更加充實漢代思想史的研究工作。 讖緯的命運隨著歷史的浪潮波蕩起伏,在經過統(tǒng)治者歷次禁毀后,最終走向衰敗,甚至典籍只零星殘存。隨著古書輯佚之風的盛行,讖緯的文本終于在古今學人的努力下漸漸還原,學者關于讖緯的研究也紛至沓來。自清代到現代,學者對于讖緯研究的成果不斷推陳出新,而讖緯的研究也轉向更加細節(jié)的探討。漢代是中國大一統(tǒng)的時代,,隨著政權與經濟的穩(wěn)定,中國進入相對的文化繁榮時期!抖Y緯》中如“記日月右行”、“西王母”、“五祀”的文本與時代學潮相互比對時,可以使我們了解《禮緯》中復雜思想的來源與文本形成的時間,同時以文字學角度探討《禮緯》三篇篇目的內涵可以輔助學人更加深入的把握文本思想!抖Y緯》作為漢代禮學神化的產物,與經學、道教、政治關系密切。漢代古文經、今文經、讖緯三者相互融合,并在具體的禮祀制度中體現了漢代天人感應與陰陽災異等神學思想對其的滲透。讖緯不僅是儒家經學的歷史變體,更是道教產生的思想來源之一,《禮緯》中豐富的神學內容對道教西王母傳說、鬼巫道、《太平經》的形成有促進作用。漢代讖緯思想作為漢代重要的學術思潮,在政權更迭中表現的淋漓盡致!抖Y緯》的文本中充斥著豐富的“天”論與帝王治世思想,在這種背景下,統(tǒng)治者通常利用讖緯的思想愚弄民眾,為自己登基而贏得受天之命的輿論。
[Abstract]:The prophecy was prevailing in the Eastern Han Dynasty and was an important part of the Han Dynasty. The rulers of the Han Dynasty made great efforts to develop Confucianism, which was based on the theory of rites. The emphasis on the study of rites in the Han Dynasty was manifested in various aspects of the Confucian classics and regime. As the development of the ritual and prophecies of the Han Dynasty, the Confucian tradition of ritual learning was not only embodied. At the same time, it has exerted a profound influence on the Confucian classics, religion and politics in the Han Dynasty. The study on the ideological connotation of Li Wei can enrich the research work of the history of thought in the Han Dynasty. With the tide of history, the fate of prophecy fluctuates, after the rulers have been banned, the final decline, and even only sporadic remains of classical books. With the popularity of ancient books, the text of prophecies gradually restored under the efforts of scholars, scholars on the study of prophecy also poured in. From the Qing Dynasty to the modern, scholars of the prophecy research continue to bring forth new results, and the study of the prophecy also turned to more detailed discussion. The Han Dynasty was the era of the great unification of China. With the stability of political power and economy, China entered a period of relative cultural prosperity. We can understand the origin of complex ideas and the time when the text was formed. At the same time, from the perspective of philology, the connotation of the three articles can help the scholars to grasp the text thought more deeply. As a product of the deification of the ritual study in the Han Dynasty, it is closely related to the study of classics, Taoism and politics. The ancient writings of the Han Dynasty, the modern classics and the prophecy are intermingled with each other, and in the specific system of ritual worship, the theological thoughts such as the induction of nature and the disaster of yin and yang are reflected in the penetration of the theological thoughts of the ancient texts of the Han Dynasty. The prophecy is not only a historical variation of Confucian classics, but also one of the ideological sources of Taoism. The rich theological content in "Lilly and Wealth" promotes the formation of the Taoist legend of the Western Queen Mother, the Ghost Witchcraft and the Taiping Classic. As an important academic trend of thought in the Han Dynasty, the thought of prophecy in the Han Dynasty was vividly displayed in the change of political power. The text of "Liwei" is full of the theory of "Heaven" and the thought of ruling the world by emperors. Rulers usually use prophecies to fool the people and win public opinion for their own reign.
【學位授予單位】:四川師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2014
【分類號】:K892.9
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 李養(yǎng)正;;《太平經》與陰陽五行說、道家及讖緯之關系[J];道協會刊;1984年15期
2 王路平;;論貴州儺文化佛道儒巫混雜現象的主要原因[J];貴州大學學報(社會科學版);2012年01期
3 潘志峰;試論西漢時期神仙方術及陰陽災異思想與讖緯的興起[J];河北學刊;1998年06期
4 向晉衛(wèi);宗廟禮制與漢代政治[J];廣西社會科學;2005年01期
5 杜鵑;;漢代宗廟儀式樂[J];淮南師范學院學報;2008年01期
6 李守清;;“讖緯之學”產生的思想淵源和歷史條件初探[J];華中師院學報(哲學社會科學版);1982年S1期
7 石磊;;禮以順天:《禮記》中的天道思想述論[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2012年01期
8 唐金裕;;西安西郊漢代建筑遺址發(fā)掘報告[J];考古學報;1959年02期
9 陳其泰;兩漢之際陰陽五行說和讖緯說的演變[J];孔子研究;1993年04期
10 朱鳳瀚;;殷墟卜辭所見商王室宗廟制度[J];歷史研究;1990年06期
本文編號:2016553
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2016553.html